DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

L2 Proficiency Effect on the Acoustic Cue-Weighting Pattern by Korean L2 Learners of English: Production and Perception of English Stops

  • Received : 2013.10.30
  • Accepted : 2013.12.11
  • Published : 2013.12.31

Abstract

This study explored how Korean L2 learners of English utilize multiple acoustic cues (VOT and F0) in perceiving and producing the English alveolar stop with a voicing contrast. Thirty-four 18-year-old high-school students participated in the study. Their English proficiency level was classified as either 'high' (HEP) or 'low' (LEP) according to high-school English level standardization. Thirty different synthesized syllables were presented in audio stimuli by combining a 6-step VOTs and a 5-step F0s. The listeners judged how close the audio stimulus was to /t/ or /d/ in L2 using a visual analogue scale. The L2 /d/ and /t/ productions collected from the 22 learners (12 HEP, 10 LEP) were acoustically analyzed by measuring VOT and F0 at the vowel onset. Results showed that LEP listeners attended to the F0 in the stimuli more sensitively than HEP listeners, suggesting that HEP listeners could inhibit less important acoustic dimensions better than LEP listeners in their L2 perception. The L2 production patterns also exhibited a group-difference between HEP and LEP in that HEP speakers utilized their VOT dimension (primary cue in L2) more effectively than LEP speakers. Taken together, the study showed that the relative cue-weighting strategies in L2 perception and production are closely related to the learner's L2 proficiency level in that more proficient learners had a better control of inhibiting and enhancing the relevant acoustic parameters.

Keywords

References

  1. Bates, D., Maechler, M., & Bolker, B. (2012). lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes. R package version 0.999999-0. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lme4
  2. Cebrian, J. (2006). Experience and the use of non-native duration in L2 vowel categorization. Journal of Phonetics, 34, 371-387.
  3. Costa, A., Hernandez M., Costa-Faidella J., & Sebastian-Galles N. (2009). On the bilingual advantage in conflict processing: now you see it, now you don't. Cognition, 113, 135-149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2009.08.001
  4. Escudero, P., & Boersma, P. (2004): Bridging the gap between L2 speech perception research and phonological theory. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26, 551-585.
  5. Emmorey, K., Luk, G., Pyers, J.E., & Bialystok, E. (2008). The source of enhanced cognitive control in bilinguals. Psychological Science, 19, 1201-1206. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02224.x
  6. Flege, J.E., O.-S. Bohn, & S. Jang. (1997). Effects of experience on non-native speakers' production and perception of English vowels. Journal of Phonetics, 25, 437-470. https://doi.org/10.1006/jpho.1997.0052
  7. Francis, A.L., Kaganovich, N., & Driscoll-Huber, C. (2008). Cue-specific effects of categorization training on the relative weighting of acoustic cues to consonant voicing in English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 124, 1234-1251. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2945161
  8. Hazan, V., & Barrett, S. (2000). The development of phonemic categorization in children aged 6-12. Journla of Phonetics, 28, 377-396. https://doi.org/10.1006/jpho.2000.0121
  9. Holt, L. L., & Lotto, A. J. (2006). Cue weighting in auditory categoriza- tion: Implications for first and second language acquisition. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 119(5), 3059-3071. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2188377
  10. Idemaru, K., Holt, L.L., & Seltman, H. (2012). Individual differences in cue weights are stable across time: the case of Japanese stops lengths. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 132, 3950-3964. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4765076
  11. Kim, M., Beddor, P., & Horrocks, J. (2002). The contribution of consonantal and vocalic information to the perception of Korean initial stops. Journal of Phonetics, 30, 77-100. https://doi.org/10.1006/jpho.2001.0152
  12. Kim, M.-R., & Park, K.-J. (2001). A Korean consonant-tone transfer in L2 (English) acquisition. Journal of the Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics, 5, 279-295.
  13. Kim, M.-R. (2011). The relationship between cross-language phonetic influences and L2 proficiency in terms of VOT. Speech Sciences, 3, No. 3, 3-11.
  14. Kim, M.-R. (2012). L1-L2 Transfer in VOT and f0 production by Korean English learners: L1 Sound change and L22 stop production. Speech Sciences, 4(3), 31-41. https://doi.org/10.13064/KSSS.2012.4.3.031
  15. Kong, E., Beckman, M. E., & Edwards, J. (2011). Why are Korean tense stops acquired so early: The role of acoustic properties. Journal of Phonetics, 39, 196-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2011.02.002
  16. Kong, E., & Edward, J. (2011). Individual differences in speech perception: Evidence from visual analogue scaling and eye-tracking. Proceedings of the 17th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, 1126-1129.
  17. Li. F. (2012). Language specific developmental dierences in speech production: A cross-language acoustic study. Child Development, 83(4), 1303-1315. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2012.01773.x
  18. Lisker, L. (1986). "Voicing" in English: A catalogue of acoustic features signaling /b/ versus /p/ in trochees. Language and Speech, 29, 3-11. https://doi.org/10.1177/002383098602900102
  19. Lisker, L., & Abramson, A. (1964). A cross-language study of voicing in initial stops: acoustical measurements. Words, 20, 384-442. https://doi.org/10.1080/00437956.1964.11659830
  20. Massaro, D. W., & Cohen, M. M. (1983). Integration of visual and auditory information in speech perception, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 9, 753-771. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.9.5.753
  21. Munson, B., Edwards, J., Schellinger, S., Beckman, M.E., & Meyer, M. (2010). Deconstructing phonetic transcription. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 24, 245-260. https://doi.org/10.3109/02699200903532524
  22. Nittrouer, S. (1992). Age-related differences in perceptual effects of formant transitions within syllables and across syllable boundaries. Journal of Phonetics, 20, 351-382.
  23. Nittrouer, S. & Miller, M. E. (1997). Predicting developmental shifts in perceptual weighting schemes. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 101, 2253-2266. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.418207
  24. Nittrouer, S. (2002). Learning to perceive speech: How fricative perception changes, and how it stays the same. Journal of the Acoustical Socieity of America, 112, 711-719. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1496082
  25. Nittrouer, S., and Lowenstein, J. H. (2010). Learning to perceptually organize speech signals in native fashion. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 127, 1624-1635 https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3298435
  26. R Core Team (2012). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0, URL http://www.R-project.org/
  27. Silva, D.J. (2006). Acoustic evidence for the emergence of tonal contrast in contemporary Korean. Phonology, 23, 287-308. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0952675706000911
  28. Shultz, A. A., Francis, A. L., & Llanos, F. (2012). Differential cue weighting in perception and production of consonant voicing. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 132, EL95-EL101. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4736711
  29. Walley, A.C., & Carrell, T.D. (1983). Onset spectra and formant transitions in the adult's and child's perception of place of articulation in stop consonants. Journal of the Acoustical Socieity of America, 73, 1011-1022. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.389149
  30. Whalen, D.H., Abramson, A.S., Lisker, L. & Mody, M. (1993). F0 gives voicing information even with unambiguous voice onset times. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 93, 2152-2159. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.406678
  31. Yamada RA, & Tohkura Y. (1992). The effects of experimental variables on the perception of American English /r/ and /l/ by Japanese listeners. Perception & Psychophysics, 52, 376-392. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206698

Cited by

  1. Individual differences in perceptual adaptability of foreign sound categories vol.78, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-015-0987-1
  2. Individual differences in phonetic cue use in production and perception of a non-native sound contrast vol.52, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2015.07.003
  3. Attentional Modulation and Individual Differences in Explaining the Changing Role of Fundamental Frequency in Korean Laryngeal Stop Perception 2017, https://doi.org/10.1177/0023830917729840