References
- AASHTO. (2007). AASHTO LRFD bridge design specifications (4th ed.).
- Applied Technology Council (ATC 32). (1996). Improved seismic design criteria for California bridges: Provisional recommendations.
- Billington, S. L., Barnes, R. W., & Breen, J. E. (2001). Alternative substructure systems for standard highway bridges. Journal of Bridge Engineering, ASCE, 6(2), 87-94. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2001)6:2(87)
- Billington, S. L., & Yoon, J. K. (2004). Cyclic response of unbonded posttensioned precast columns with ductile fiberreinforced concrete. Journal of Bridge Engineering, ASCE, 9(4), 353-363. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2004)9:4(353)
- Cheng, C.-T. (2008). Shaking table tests a self-centering designed bridge substructure. Engineering Structures, 30(12), 3426-3433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2008.05.017
- Chou, C.-C., & Chen, Y.-C. (2006). Cyclic tests of post-tensioned precast CFT segmental bridge columns with unbonded strands. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 35, 159-175. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.512
- Dawood, H., EIGawady, M., & Hewes, J. (2012). Behavior of segmental precast posttensioned bridge piers under lateral loads. Journal of Bridge Engineering, ASCE, 17(5), 735-746. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000252
- EIGawady, M. A., & Dawood, H. M. (2012). Analysis of segmental piers consisted of concrete filled FRP tubes. Engineering Structures, 38, 142-152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.01.001
- Federal Emergency Management Agency. (1997). NEHRP guidelines of the seismic rehabilitation of buildings, FEMA 273. Washington, DC: FEMA.
- Hewes, J. T. (2002). Seismic design and performance of precast concrete segmental bridge columns. Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Structural Engineering, University of California, San Diego, CA.
- Hilber, H. M., Hughes, T. J. R., & Taylor, R. L. (1977). Improved numerical dissipation for time integration algorithms in structural dynamics. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 5, 282-292.
- Hughes, T. J. R. (1987). The finite element method. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
- Kim, T.-H., Kim, Y.-J., Kang, H.-T., & Shin, H. M. (2007). Performance assessment of reinforced concrete bridge columns using a damage index. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 34(7), 843-855. https://doi.org/10.1139/l07-003
- Kim, T. -H., Kim, Y. -J., & Shin, H. M. (submitted). Performance assessment of precast concrete pier cap system. Computers and Concrete.
- Kim, T.-H., Lee, H.-M., Kim, Y.-J., & Shin, H. M. (2010a). Performance assessment of precast concrete segmental bridge columns with a shear resistant connecting structure. Engineering Structures, 32(5), 1292-1303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.01.007
- Kim, T.-H., Park, J.-G., Kim, Y.-J., & Shin, H. M. (2008). A computational platform for seismic performance assessment of reinforced concrete bridge piers with unbonded reinforcing or prestressing bars. Computers and Concrete, 5(2), 135-154. https://doi.org/10.12989/cac.2008.5.2.135
- Kim, T.-H., Park, S.-J., Kim, Y.-J., & Shin, H. M. (2010b). Performance assessment of precast segmental PSC bridge columns with precast concrete footings. Magazine of Concrete Research, 62(11), 773-787. https://doi.org/10.1680/macr.2010.62.11.773
- Maekawa, K., Pimanmas, A., & Okamura, H. (2001). Nonlinear mechanics of reinforced concrete. London, UK:SPONPress.
- Mander, J. B., Priestley, M. J. N., & Park, R. (1988). Theoretical stress-strain model for confined concrete. Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 114(8), 1804-1826. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1988)114:8(1804)
- Ministry of Construction and Transportation. (2005). Korea highway bridge design code.
- Murla-Vila, D., Sanchez-Ramirez,A. R., Huerta-Carpizo,C. H.,& Fernandez-Sola, L. R. (2012). In-situ test of a precast pier of an elevated viaduct in Mexico City. In 15th world conference on earthquake and engineering, Lisbon, Portugal, USB.
- Ou, Y.-C., Chiewanichakorn, M., Aref, A. J., & Lee, G. C. (2007). Seismic performance of segmental precast unbonded posttensioned concrete bridge columns. Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 133(11), 1636-1647. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2007)133:11(1636)
- Rouse, J. M. (2004). Behavior of bridge piers with ductile fiber reinforced hinge regions and vertical, unbonded post-tensioning. Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Civil Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
- Sun, Y. P., & Sakino, K. (2000). A comprehensive stress-strain model for high strength concrete confined by circular transverse reinforcement. In The 6th ASCCS international conference on steel-concrete composite structures, University of Southern California (pp. 1067-1074).
- Taylor, R. L. (2000). FEAP-A finite element analysis program, version 7.2 users manual (Vols. 1 and 2). London, UK: Butterworth.
- Wang, J.-C., Ou, Y.-C., Chang, K.-C., & Lee, G. C. (2008). Large-scale seismic tests of tall concrete bridge columns with precast segmental construction. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 37, 1449-1465. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.824
- Xiao, J., Huang, X., & Shen, L. (2012). Seismic behavior of semi-precast column with recycled aggregate concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 35, 988-1001. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.04.062
- Yamashita, R., & Sanders, D. (2009). Seismic performance of precast unbonded prestressed concrete columns. ACI Structural Journal, 106(6), 821-830.
Cited by
- The Hysteresis Performance and Restoring Force Model for Corroded Reinforced Concrete Frame Columns vol.2016, pp.None, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/7615385
- Analytical Study of Force–Displacement Behavior and Ductility of Self-centering Segmental Concrete Columns vol.11, pp.3, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40069-017-0209-4
- Temporary Shear Brace Design Method for Steel Box Girder Viaduct in Transverse Block Construction vol.18, pp.3, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13296-018-0063-5
- Assessment of ultimate load of drilled shaft socketed in rocks based on pile load tests vol.26, pp.3, 2013, https://doi.org/10.12989/gae.2021.26.3.215