터널과지하공간 (Tunnel and Underground Space)

  • 제23권6호
  • /
  • Pages.581-592
  • /
  • 2013
  • /
  • 1225-1275(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2287-1748(eISSN)
한국암반공학회 (Korean Society for Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

지열에너지와 관련한 유럽에서의 연구프로젝트 소개와 유도지진에 관한 GEISER프로젝트의 주요연구결과에 대한 사례연구

Overview of Geothermal Energy Projects in Europe and the GEISER Project on Induced Seismicity

  • Yoon, Jeoung Seok (Helmholtz Centre Potsdam, GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences) ;
  • Bruhn, David (Helmholtz Centre Potsdam, GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences) ;
  • Zang, Arno (Helmholtz Centre Potsdam, GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences)
  • 투고 : 2013.11.13
  • 심사 : 2013.12.11
  • 발행 : 2013.12.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 사례연구논문에서는 유럽에서의 지열에너지개발과 관련된 연구프로젝트의 현황에 대한 개괄적인 내용과, 저자가 참여했던 GEISER프로젝트(Geothermal Engineering Integrating Mitigation of Induced Seismicity in Reservoirs)와 핵심세부과제인 유도지진(Induced Seismicity)에 관한 연구결과를 요약 정리하였다. 본 사례연구 논문에서 다룬 GEISER프로젝트의 연구결과와 교훈을 통해 수리자극에 의한 지열저류층 개발과 그에 수반되는 유도지진에 따른 문제가 예상되는 향후 지열에너지개발 프로젝트에 도움이 될 수 있기를 기대한다.

This article provides an overview on the geothermal energy research in Europe and one of the EU funded projects 'GEISER (Geothermal Engineering Integrating Mitigation of Induced Seismicity in Reservoirs)' in which the authors were involved. More details are given for description of GEISER, in particular, about aims and discussions and how the project was managed. Emphasis is given to one of the work packages 'Induced Seismicity and Large Magnitude Events (LME)' and results of this work package are summarized. This article intends to summarize the lessons learned in the GEISER project and give recommendations to future geothermal projects by creating Enhanced Geothermal Systems hydraulic stimulation where induced seismicity issues are expected to be a major issue and obstacle.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Bachmann C.E., Wiemer S., Goertz-Allmann B.P., Woessner J. 2012. Influence of pore-pressure on the event-size distribution of induced earthquakes. Geophysical Research Letters 39, L09302.
  2. Bommer J.J., Oates S., Cepeda J.M., Lindholm C., Bird J., Torres R., Marroquin G., Rivas J. 2006. Control of hazard due to seismicity induced by a hot fractured rock geothermal project. Engineering Geology 83, 287-306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2005.11.002
  3. Breede K., Dzebisashvili K., Liu X., Falcone G. 2013. A systematic review of enhanced (or engineered) geothermal systems: past, present and future. Geothermal Energy 2013, 1:4. https://doi.org/10.1186/2195-9706-1-4
  4. Catalli F., Meier M.-A., Wiemer S. 2013. The role of Coulomb stress changes for injection-induced seismicity: The Basel enhanced geothermal system. Geophysical Research Letters 40, 72-77. https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL054147
  5. Charlety J., Cuenot N., Dorbath L., Dorbath C., Haessler H., Frogneux M. 2007. Large earthquakes during hydraulic stimulations at the geothermal site of Soultzsous-Forets. International Journal of Rock Mechanics Mining Sciences 44, 1091-1105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2007.06.003
  6. Evans K.R., Zappone A., Deichmann N., Mola F. 2012. A survey of the induced seismic responses to fluid injection in geothermal and CO2 reservoirs in Europe. Geothermics 41, 30-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geothermics.2011.08.002
  7. European Commission. 2013a. European Commission website: Research & Innovation, Energy, Research, Geothermal energy, Background. Link: http://ec.europa.eu/research/energy/eu/index_en.cfm?pg=research-geother mal-background, last accessed on 31 Oct. 2013.
  8. European Commission. 2013b. European Commission website: Research & Innovation, Energy, EU Energy, Projects. Link: http://ec.europa.eu/research/energy/eu/index_en.cfm?pg=projects#results, last accessed on 31 Oct. 2013.
  9. Gischig V., Goertz-Allmann B.P., Bachmann C.E., Wiemer S. 2012. Effect of non-linear fluid pressure diffusion on modeling induced seismicity during reservoir stimulation. Geophysical Research Abstracts Vol.14, EGU2012-7483, 2012, EGU General Assembly 2012.
  10. Goertz-Allmann B.P., Goertz A., Wiemer S. 2011. Stress drop variations of induced earthquakes at the Basel geothermal site. Geophysical Research Letters 38, 1-5.
  11. Goertz-Allmann B.P., Wiemer S. 2012. Geomechanical modeling of induced seismicity source parameters and implications for seismic hazard assessment. Geophysics 78(1), KS25-KS39.
  12. Grünthal G. 2013. Induced seismicity related to geothermal projects versus natural tectonic earthquakes and other types of induced seismic events in Central Europe. Geothermics, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.geothermics.2013.09.009
  13. Häring M.O., Schanz U., Ladner F., Dyer B.C. 2008. Characterisation of the Basel 1 enhanced geothermal system. Geothermics 37, 469-495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geothermics.2008.06.002
  14. Kwiatek G., Bulut F., Bohnhoff M., Dresen G. 2013. High-resolution analysis of seismicity induced at Berlín geothermal field, El Salvador. Geothermics, in Press.
  15. McGarr A. 1976. Seismic Moments and Volume Change. Journal of Geophysical Research 81(8), 1487-1494. https://doi.org/10.1029/JB081i008p01487
  16. Shapiro S.A., Dinske C., Kummerow J. 2007. Probability of a given-magnitude earthquake induced by a fluid Injection. Geophysical Research Letters 34, L22314. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL031615
  17. Shapiro S.A., Dinske C., Langenbruch C., Wenzel F. 2010. Seismogenic index and magnitude probability of earthquakes induced during reservoir fluid stimulations. The Leading Edge, March 2012, 304-309.
  18. Zang A., Yoon J.S., Stephansson O., Heidbach O. 2013. Fatigue hydraulic fracturing by cyclic reservoir treatment enhances permeability and reduced induced seismicity. Geophysical Journal International 195, 1282-1287. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggt301