DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A taxonomic study of the genus Actinidia in Korea

한국산 다래나무속의 분류학적 연구

  • Received : 2013.02.04
  • Accepted : 2013.11.26
  • Published : 2013.12.30

Abstract

The genus Actinidia has been recorded as having total six taxa, composed of four species and two varieties, in Korea. However, its taxonomy remains complex because of disagreement on taxonomic characters used for species boundaries. Based upon morphological, anatomical, and palynological characters, we re-evaluated species delimitations in the genus Actinidia. Critical observation of wild populations and extensive herbarium materials including types were also carried out. It is generally considered that leaf thickness and shape, hair type and color were important diagnostic characters to identify species, but these characters were insufficient to be diagnostic characters because of their wide variation ranges. On the other hands, pith pattern, winter bud protrusion rate, scale leaf number, anther color, fruit shape, and maturity season were taxonomic significance. A. arguta var. platyphylla and A. arguta var. rufinervis have been identified by hair type and color, but these characters showed continuous variation in A. arguta. Therefore, two varieties are treated as synonyms of A. arguta. Consequently four species are recognized in Korea: A. polygama, A. kolomikta, A. rufa, and A. arguta. A key is provided, as well as complete descriptions of the species examined, including information on nomenclatural types, and synonymies.

한국산 다래나무속은 4종 2변종, 총 6분류군으로 분류하여 왔으나, 이들을 구분하는 분류학적 형질에 대한 이견이 존재함에 따라 형태학적, 해부학적, 화분학적 형질을 토대로 종의 한계를 재고하고자 하였다. 아울러, 다양한 자연집단을 관찰하였으며, 각국의 표본관에 소장된 기준표본을 포함한 건조표본들을 관찰하였다. 연구 결과, 잎의 두께, 털의 형태와 색깔, 엽형 등은 중요한 형질로 여겨왔으나 폭넓은 변이로 인해 식별형질로 부적합하였으며, 수의 형태, 동아의 돌출 정도, 인편 수, 약의 색깔, 열매 모양, 숙과기 등은 유용한 형질이었다. 털다래나무와 녹다래나무는 털의 형질에 기초하여 분류되었으나, 이들 두 분류군에서 나타나는 털은 다래나무에서도 관찰되므로 모종에 통합하였다. 결과적으로, 한국산 다래나무속 식물을 총 4종으로 정리하였고 이에 따른 검색표를 제시하였으며 이명과 기준표본을 정리한 기재문을 작성하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. Bean, W. J. 1914. Trees & Shrubs hardy in the British Isles Vol. 1. John Murray. London.
  2. Chat, J., B. Jauregui, R. J. Petit and S. Nadot. 2004. Reticulate evolution in kiwifruit (Actinidia, Actinidiaceae) identified by comparing their maternal and paternal phylogenies. American Journal of Botany 91: 736-747. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.91.5.736
  3. Chung, T. H. 1956. Korean Flora. Shinjisa, Seoul. (in Korean)
  4. Cipriani, G., R. Testolin and R. Gardner. 1998. Restriction-site variation of PCR-amplified chloroplast DNA regions and its implication for the evolution and taxonomy of Actinidia. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 96: 389-396. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001220050754
  5. Cui, Z., H. Huang and X. Xingguo. 2002. Actinidia in China. China agricultural Science and Technology Press, Beijing.
  6. Dunn, S. T. 1911. A revision of the genus Actinidia Lindl. Journal of the Linnean Society. Botany 39: 394-411. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8339.1911.tb02326.x
  7. Ferguson, A. R. 1990. Botanical nomenclature: Acinidia chinensis, Actinidia deliciosa, and Actinidia setosa. In Kiwifruit: Science and Management. Warrington, J. and G. C. Weston (eds.), New zealand Society for Horticultural Science, Auckland.
  8. Hsieh, T. Y., S. M. Ku, C. T. Chien and Y. T. Liou. 2011. Classifier modeling and numerical taxonomy of Actinidia (Actinidiaceae) in Taiwn. Botanical Studies 52: 337-357.
  9. Jiang, Z. W., S. M. Wang, Z. H. Zhang and H. W. Huang. 2004. Pollen morphology of Actinidia and its systematic significance. Acta Phytotaxonomica Sinica 42: 245-260.
  10. Kim, H., G. S. Chang, C. S. Chang and B. H. Choi. 2006. Reexamination on foreign collectors' sites and exploration routes in Korea (2)-with respect to T. Nakai-. Korean Journal of Plant Taxonomy 36: 227-255. https://doi.org/10.11110/kjpt.2006.36.3.227
  11. Kim, H., K. S. Chang and C. S. Chang. 2010. E. H. Wilson's Expedition to Korea from 1917 to 1919: Resolving Place Names of His Collections. Journal of Japanese Botany 85: 99-117.
  12. Kim, M. Y. 2004. Korean Endemic Plants. Solkwahak. Seoul. (in Korean)
  13. Kim, S. C., Y. H. Jung, M. Kim, C. H. Kim, S. C. Koh and S. H. Kang. 2003. Genetic relationships of genus Actinidia based on random amplified polymorphic DNA analysis. Journal of the Korean Society for Horticultural Science 44: 340-344. (in Korean)
  14. Koidzumi. G. 1930. Contributiones ad Cognigionem Florae Asiae Orientalis. Botanical Magazine 44: 93-112. https://doi.org/10.15281/jplantres1887.44.93
  15. Korea National Arboretum and the Plant Taxonomic Society of Korea. 2007. A Synonymic List of Vascular Plants in Korea. Korea National Arboretum. Pocheon. (in Korean)
  16. Lee, T. B. 1980. Illustrated flora of Korea. Hyangmunsa, Seoul. (in Korean)
  17. Lee, W. T. 1996. Lineamenta Florae Koreae. Academy Publishing Co., Ltd. Seoul. (in Korean)
  18. Lee, Y. N. 1996. Flora of Korea. Kyo-Hak Publishing Co., Ltd. Seoul. (in Korean)
  19. Li, H. L. 1952. A taxonomic review of the genus Actinidia. Journal of the Arnold Arboretum 33: 1-61.
  20. Li, X. W., J. Q. Li and D. D. Soejarto. 2007. Actinidiaceae. In Flora of China. Vol. 12 (Hippocastanacea through Rheaceae). Wu, Z. Y., P. H. Raven & D. Y. Hong (eds.), Science Press and Missouri Botanical Garden Press, Beijing and St. Louis.
  21. Li, X. W., J. Q. Li. 2010. A review of the infrageneric taxonomy and nomenclature of Actinidia (Actinidiaceae). Annales Botanici Fennici 47: 106-108. https://doi.org/10.5735/085.047.0202
  22. Liang, C. F. 1983. On the distribution of Actinidias. Guihaia 3: 229-248.
  23. Lindly, J. 1836. Characters of the new genera introduced in the preceding work; with occasional notes upon some of the old genera. An Introduction to the Natural System of Botany 2: 439-452.
  24. Maack, R. and F. J. Ruprecht. 1857. Die ersten botanischen Nachrichten uber Das Amurland. Zweite Abtheilung. Bulletin de la Class Physico-Mathematique de l'Academie Imperiale des Sciences de Saint-Petersbourg 15: 257-267.
  25. Makino, T. 1901. Observations on the Flora of Japan. Botanical Magazine 15: 141-153.
  26. Maximowicz, C. and E. Regel. 1857. Esquisse de la vegetation dans la basse-region de l'Amour.. Bulletin de la Class Physico-Mathematique de l'Academie Imperiale des Sciences de Saint-Petersbourg 15: 211-238.
  27. Maximowicz, C. and F. J. Ruprecht. 1857. Die ersten botanichen Nachrichten uber das Amurland. Erste Abtheilung. Bulletin de la Class Physico-Mathematique de l'Academie Imperiale des Sciences de Saint-Petersbourg 15: 120-144.
  28. Maximowicz, C. J. 1859. Primitiae florae Amurensis. Versuch einer Flora des Amurlandes. Mit 10 Tafeln und einer Karte. Memoires Presentes a l'Academie Imperiale des Sciences de St.-Petersbourg par Divers Savans et lus dans ses Assemblees 9: 63-64.
  29. Maximowicz, C. J. 1887. Diagnoses de nouvelles plantes de l'Asie. 6. Bulletin de l'Academie Imperiale des Sciences de Saint-Petersbourg (ser. 3) 31: 12-121.
  30. Miquel, F. A. G. 1867. Prolusio Florae Iaponicae. Annales Musei Botanici Lugduno-Batavi 3: 1-66.
  31. Nakai, T. 1933. Notulae ad Plantas Japoniae & Koreae 43. Botanical Magazine 47: 235-267, 317-326. https://doi.org/10.15281/jplantres1887.47.235
  32. Nakai, T. 1939. Notulae ad Asiae Orientalis (10). Journal of Japanese Botany 15: 672-692.
  33. Nakai, T. 1952. A synoptical sketch of Korean flora. Bulletin of the National Science Museum, Tokyo 31: 1-124.
  34. Oh, B. U., D. G. Jo, K. S. Kim and C. G. Jang. 2005. Endemic Vascular Plants in the Korean Peninsula. Korea National Arboretum. Pocheon. (in Korean)
  35. Ohba, H. 2006. Actinidiaceae. in Flora of Japan. Vol. 2a. K. Iwatsuki, D. E. Boufford and H. Ohba (eds.). Kodansa Ltd., Tokyo.
  36. Park, H. Y., T. J. Kim and H. W. Oh. 2001. Pollen of Korea ser. 2. Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Daejeon. (in Korean)
  37. Poyarkova, A. I. 1974. Actinidiaceae. In Flora of the U.S.S.R.. Vol. 15. Shishkin, B. K. and E. G. Bobrov (eds.), Israel Program for Scientific Translations, Jerusalem.
  38. Regel, E. 1857. Vegetations-Skizzen des Amurlandes, gesammelt von dem Reisenden des Kaiserl. Botanischen Gartens zu St, Petersburg, Hrn. Maximowicz. Bulletin de la Class Physico-Mathematique de l'Academie Imperiale des Sciences de Saint-Petersbourg 15: 211-222.
  39. Siebold, F. and J. G. Zuccarini. 1843. Plantarum, Quas In Japonia Collegit Dr. Ph. Fr. de Siebold Genera Nova, Notis Characteristicis Delineationibusque Illustrata proponunt Dr. Ph. Fr. de Siebold et Dr. J. G. Zuccarini Fasciculus Primus. Cum tab. lapidi incisis 5. Abhandlungen der Mathematisch-Physikalischen Classe der Koniglich Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften 3: 717-753.
  40. Testolin, R., G. Cipriani, A. R. Ferguson and R. C. Gardener. 1997. Molecular approaches to systematics of Actinidia. Acta Horticulturae 444: 97-102.
  41. Wilson, E. H. 1915. Dilleniaceae. Plantae Wilsonianae 2: 378-389.

Cited by

  1. A checklist of endemic plants on the Korean Peninsula vol.47, pp.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.11110/kjpt.2017.47.3.264
  2. The Analysis of Flower Morpological Charateristics and Correlation of Native Prunus Yedoensis Matsum. Clone Selected as Landscape Tree in Jeju vol.54, pp.6, 2013, https://doi.org/10.14397/jals.2020.54.6.49