Archives of Plastic Surgery

Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons (대한성형외과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

One-Stage Nipple and Breast Reconstruction Following Areola-Sparing Mastectomy

  • Kim, Hye Ri (Department of Plastic Surgery, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine) ;
  • Lim, Jin Soo (Department of Plastic Surgery, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Sue Min (Department of Plastic Surgery, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine) ;
  • Jung, Sung No (Department of Plastic Surgery, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine) ;
  • Yoo, Gyeol (Department of Plastic Surgery, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine) ;
  • Rha, Eun Young (Department of Plastic Surgery, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine)
  • Received : 2013.03.27
  • Accepted : 2013.07.04
  • Published : 2013.09.15
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Background Skin-sparing mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction is increasingly becoming a proven surgical option for early-stage breast cancer patients. Areola-sparing mastectomy (ASM) has also recently become a popular procedure. The purpose of this article is to investigate the reconstructive and aesthetic issues experienced with one-stage nipple and breast reconstruction using ASM. Methods Among the patients who underwent mastectomy between March 2008 and March 2010, 5 women with a low probability of nipple-areolar complex malignant involvement underwent ASM and immediate breast reconstruction with simultaneous nipple reconstruction using the modified C-V flap. The cosmetic outcomes of this series were reviewed by plastic surgeons and patient self-assessment and satisfaction were assessed via telephone interview. Results During the average 11-month follow-up period, there were no cases of cancer recurrence, the aesthetic outcomes were graded as excellent to very good, and all of the patients were satisfied. Two patients developed a gutter-like depression around the reconstructed nipple, and one patient developed skin erosion in a small area of the areola, which healed with conservative dressing. The other complications, such as necrosis of the skin flap or areola, seroma, hematoma, or fat necrosis did not occur. Conclusions Since one-stage nipple and breast reconstruction following ASM is an oncologically safe, cost-effective, and aesthetically satisfactory procedure, it is a good surgical option for early breast cancer patients.

Keywords

References

  1. Rosenqvist S, Sandelin K, Wickman M. Patients' psychological and cosmetic experience after immediate breast reconstruction. Eur J Surg Oncol 1996;22:262-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0748-7983(96)80015-1
  2. Carlson GW, Bostwick J 3rd, Styblo TM, et al. Skin-sparing mastectomy: oncologic and reconstructive considerations. Ann Surg 1997;225:570-5. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-199705000-00013
  3. Hidalgo DA. Aesthetic refinement in breast reconstruction: complete skin-sparing mastectomy with autogenous tissue transfer. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998;102:63-70. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199807000-00009
  4. Toth BA, Forley BG, Calabria R. Retrospective study of the skin-sparing mastectomy in breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999;104:77-84. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199907000-00011
  5. Mustonen P, Lepisto J, Papp A, et al. The surgical and oncological safety of immediate breast reconstruction. Eur J Surg Oncol 2004;30:817-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2004.06.003
  6. Simmons RM, Brennan M, Christos P, et al. Analysis of nipple/areolar involvement with mastectomy: can the areola be preserved? Ann Surg Oncol 2002;9:165-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02557369
  7. Mathes SJ, Ueno CM. Reconstruction of the nipple-areola complex. In: Mathes SJ, Hentz VR, editors. Plastic surgery. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Saunders Elsevier; 2006. p.791-818.
  8. Mori H, Hata Y. Modified C-V flap in nipple reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2008;61:1109-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2008.04.010
  9. Salgarello M, Visconti G, Barone-Adesi L. Nipple-sparing mastectomy with immediate implant reconstruction: cosmetic outcomes and technical refinements. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010;126:1460-71. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181ef8bce
  10. McCarthy CM, Klassen AF, Cano SJ, et al. Patient satisfaction with postmastectomy breast reconstruction: a comparison of saline and silicone implants. Cancer 2010;116:5584-91. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.25552
  11. Pusic AL, Klassen AF, Scott AM, et al. Development of a new patient-reported outcome measure for breast surgery: the BREAST-Q. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009;124:345-53. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181aee807
  12. Simmons RM, Adamovich TL. Skin-sparing mastectomy. Surg Clin North Am 2003;83:885-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0039-6109(03)00035-5
  13. Giacometti L, Montagna W. The nipple and the areola of the human female breast. Anat Rec 1962;144:191-7. https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.1091440303
  14. Simmons RM, Hollenbeck ST, Latrenta GS. Two-year followup of areola-sparing mastectomy with immediate reconstruction. Am J Surg 2004;188:403-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2004.07.001
  15. Kissin MW, Kark AE. Nipple preservation during mastectomy. Br J Surg 1987;74:58-61. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.1800740118
  16. Cense HA, Rutgers EJ, Lopes Cardozo M, et al. Nipplesparing mastectomy in breast cancer: a viable option? Eur J Surg Oncol 2001;27:521-6. https://doi.org/10.1053/ejso.2001.1130
  17. Simmons RM, Hollenbeck ST, Latrenta GS. Areola-sparing mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 2003;51:547-51. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sap.0000095659.93306.48
  18. Hammond DC. Prophylactic simple mastectomy and reconstruction, including prosthetic, latissimus, and transverse rectus abdominus myocutaneous flap techniques. In: Spear SL, Willey SC, Robb GL, et al., editors. Surgery of the breast: principles and art. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2006. p.346-8.
  19. Kim JT, Kim CY, Cha JH, et al. Immediate nipple reconstruction in breast reconstruction with TRAM free flap. J Korean Soc Plast Reconstr Surg 2005;32:76-84.
  20. Delay E, Mojallal A, Vasseur C, et al. Immediate nipple reconstruction during immediate autologous latissimus breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006;118:1303-12. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000244013.11974.ec
  21. Ma G, Richardson H, Pacella SJ, et al. Single-stage breast reconstruction following areola-sparing mastectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009;123:1414-7. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181a073c6
  22. Horikawa T, Norris DA, Yohn JJ, et al. Melanocyte mitogens induce both melanocyte chemokinesis and chemotaxis. J Invest Dermatol 1995;104:256-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/1523-1747.ep12612795
  23. Mohamed SA, Parodi PC. A modified technique for nippleareola complex reconstruction. Indian J Plast Surg 2011;44: 76-80. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-0358.81450
  24. Craig ES, Walker ME, Salomon J, et al. Immediate nipple reconstruction utilizing the DIEP flap in areola-sparing mastectomy. Microsurgery 2013;33:125-9. https://doi.org/10.1002/micr.22020

Cited by

  1. Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Reconstructive Breast Surgery: Is There a Role for Generic Measures? vol.135, pp.3, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1097/prs.0000000000000954
  2. Nipple-Areola Complex Necrosis after Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy with Immediate Autologous Breast Reconstruction vol.42, pp.5, 2013, https://doi.org/10.5999/aps.2015.42.5.601
  3. Immediate nipple reconstruction with thoracodorsal artery perforator flap in breast reconstruction by latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap in patients with Poland's syndrome vol.36, pp.1, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1002/micr.22395
  4. Skin-sparing mastectomy with immediate nipple reconstruction during autologous latissimus dorsi breast reconstruction: A review of patient satisfaction vol.45, pp.6, 2013, https://doi.org/10.5999/aps.2017.01725