Archives of Plastic Surgery

Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons (대한성형외과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Comparative Study of CG CryoDerm and AlloDerm in Direct-to-Implant Immediate Breast Reconstruction

  • Lee, Jun Ho (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Yeungnam University College of Medicine) ;
  • Park, Ki Rin (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Yeungnam University College of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Tae Gon (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Yeungnam University College of Medicine) ;
  • Ha, Ju-Ho (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Yeungnam University College of Medicine) ;
  • Chung, Kyu-Jin (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Yeungnam University College of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Yong-Ha (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Yeungnam University College of Medicine) ;
  • Lee, Soo Jung (Department of General Surgery, Yeungnam University College of Medicine) ;
  • Kang, Soo Hwan (Department of General Surgery, Yeungnam University College of Medicine)
  • Received : 2013.03.15
  • Accepted : 2013.05.12
  • Published : 2013.07.15
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Background To date, various types of acellular dermal matrix (ADM) have been developed for clinical use. AlloDerm is the most familiar type of ADM to most surgeons in breast reconstruction. It is prepared by freeze-drying. CG CryoDerm is the first form of ADM that requires no drying process. Therefore, theoretically, it has a higher degree of preservation of the dermal structures than AlloDerm. We conducted this study to compare the clinical course and postoperative outcomes of patients who underwent direct-to-implant breast reconstructions using AlloDerm and those who did using CG CryoDerm. Methods We performed a retrospective analysis of the medical records in a consecutive series of 50 patients who underwent direct-to-implant breast reconstruction using AlloDerm (n=31) or CryoDerm (n=19). We then compared the clinical course and postoperative outcomes of the two groups based on the overall incidence of complications and the duration of drainage. Results The mean follow-up period was 16 months. There were no significant differences in the overall incidence of complications (seroma, infection, skin flap necrosis, capsular contracture, and implant loss) between the two groups. Nor was there any significant difference in the duration of drainage. Conclusions CG CryoDerm has the merits of short preparation time and easy handling during surgery. Our results indicate that CG CryoDerm might be an alternative allograft material to AlloDerm in direct-to-implant breast reconstruction.

Keywords

References

  1. Breuing KH, Warren SM. Immediate bilateral breast reconstruction with implants and inferolateral AlloDerm slings. Ann Plast Surg 2005;55:232-9. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sap.0000168527.52472.3c
  2. Spear SL, Pelletiere SC, Lockwood M. Immediate breast reconstruction with tissue expanders and AlloDerm. In: Spear SL, Willey SC, Robb GL, et al., editors. Surgery of the breast: principles and art. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2006. p.484-8.
  3. Salzberg CA. Direct-to-implant breast reconstruction. Clin Plast Surg 2012;39:119-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cps.2012.01.001
  4. Cheng A, Saint-Cyr M. Comparison of different ADM materials in breast surgery. Clin Plast Surg 2012;39:167-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cps.2012.02.004
  5. Nahabedian MY. Acellular dermal matrices in primary breast reconstruction: principles, concepts, and indications. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012;130:44S-53S. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e31825f2215
  6. Gabriel A, Maxwell GP. Evolving role of alloderm in breast surgery. Plast Surg Nurs 2011;31:141-50. https://doi.org/10.1097/PSN.0b013e31823b2c30
  7. Basu CB, Leong M, Hicks MJ. Acellular cadaveric dermis decreases the inflammatory response in capsule formation in reconstructive breast surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010;126:1842-7. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181f44674
  8. Buinewicz B, Rosen B. Acellular cadaveric dermis (Allo-Derm): a new alternative for abdominal hernia repair. Ann Plast Surg 2004;52:188-94. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sap.0000100895.41198.27
  9. Butler CE, Prieto VG. Reduction of adhesions with composite AlloDerm/polypropylene mesh implants for abdominal wall reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004;114:464-73. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.PRS.0000132670.81794.7E
  10. Butler CE, Langstein HN, Kronowitz SJ. Pelvic, abdominal, and chest wall reconstruction with AlloDerm in patients at increased risk for mesh-related complications. Plast Reconstr Surg 2005;116:1263-75. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000181692.71901.bd
  11. Clemons JL, Myers DL, Aguilar VC, et al. Vaginal paravaginal repair with an AlloDerm graft. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003;189:1612-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9378(03)00929-3
  12. Rohrich RJ, Reagan BJ, Adams WP Jr, et al. Early results of vermilion lip augmentation using acellular allogeneic dermis: an adjunct in facial rejuvenation. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000;105:409-16. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-200001000-00065
  13. Jackson IT, Yavuzer R. AlloDerm for dorsal nasal irregularities. Plast Reconstr Surg 2001;107:553-8. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-200102000-00038
  14. Sinha UK, Saadat D, Doherty CM, et al. Use of AlloDerm implant to prevent frey syndrome after parotidectomy. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2003;5:109-12. https://doi.org/10.1001/archfaci.5.1.109
  15. Taban M, Douglas R, Li T, et al. Efficacy of "thick" acellular human dermis (AlloDerm) for lower eyelid reconstruction: comparison with hard palate and thin AlloDerm grafts. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2005;7:38-44. https://doi.org/10.1001/archfaci.7.1.38
  16. Kim HS, Suh HW, Ha KY, et al. The usefulness of the endonasal incisional approach for the treatment of nasal bone fracture. Arch Plast Surg 2012;39:209-15. https://doi.org/10.5999/aps.2012.39.3.209
  17. Lifecell. AlloDerm tissue matrix defined [Internet]. Branchburg, NJ: LifeCell Corp.; 2013 [cited 2013 Mar 8]. Available from: http://www.lifecell.com/health-care-professionals/lifecell-products/allodermr-regenerative-tissue-matrix/allodermr-tissue-matrix-defined.
  18. Breuing KH, Colwell AS. Inferolateral AlloDerm hammock for implant coverage in breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 2007;59:250-5. https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0b013e31802f8426
  19. Lifecell. Strattice reconstructive tissue matrix [Internet]. Branchburg, NJ: LifeCell Corp.; 2013 [cited 2013 Mar 8]. Available from: http://www.lifecell.com/health-careprofessionals/lifecell-products/stratticetm-reconstructivetissue-matrix.
  20. Synthes. DermaMatrix acellular dermis [Internet]. Philadelphia: Synthes Inc.; 2012 [cited 2013 Mar 8]. Available from: http://www.synthes.com/sites/NA/Products/CMF/AcellularDermis/Pages/DermaMatrix_Acellular_Dermis.aspx.
  21. Ethicon Inc. FlexHD acellular hydrated dermis for breast reconstruction [Internet]. New Jersey: Ethicon Inc.; 2013 [cited 2013 Mar 8]. Available from: http://www.ethicon360. com/products/flex-hd-acel-hydrated-dermis-breast-reconstruction.
  22. Covidien. Permacol surgical implant [Internet]. Mansfield: Covidien; 2013 [cited 2013 Mar 8]. Available from: http://www.autosuture.com/autosuture/pagebuilder.aspx?webPageID=0&topicID=170603&xsl=xsl/productPagePrint.xsl.

Cited by

  1. Multilayered implantation using acellular dermal matrix into nude mice vol.25, pp.12, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-014-5281-6
  2. Direct to implant breast reconstruction by using SERI®, preliminary report vol.33, pp.1, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13046-014-0078-5
  3. Tissue Reinforcement in Implant-based Breast Reconstruction vol.2, pp.8, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1097/gox.0000000000000140
  4. Acellular Dermal Matrix for Reoperative Breast Augmentation vol.134, pp.5, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1097/prs.0000000000000777
  5. Problems Associated with Alloplastic Materials in Rhinoplasty vol.55, pp.6, 2013, https://doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2014.55.6.1617
  6. Various Applications of Deep Temporal Fascia in Rhinoplasty vol.56, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2015.56.1.167
  7. Evaluating the Effectiveness of Cryopreserved Acellular Dermal Matrix in Immediate Expander-Based Breast Reconstruction: A Comparison Study vol.42, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.5999/aps.2015.42.3.316
  8. Seroma in Prosthetic Breast Reconstruction vol.137, pp.4, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000481102.24444.72
  9. Acellular dermal matrices in breast reconstructions - a literature review vol.50, pp.4, 2013, https://doi.org/10.3109/2000656x.2016.1140053