Asian Journal of Innovation and Policy

Asian Society for Innovation and Policy (아시아기술혁신학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Performance Evaluation Index of TRM: A Korean Case for SMEs

  • Park, SunYoung (Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information) ;
  • Son, JongKu (Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information) ;
  • Seo, JuHwan (Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information) ;
  • Seo, Jinny (Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information)
  • Received : 2013.03.19
  • Accepted : 2013.04.30
  • Published : 2013.05.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

There is the need for performance evaluation and the identification of key success factors for utilizing technology roadmaps (TRM), but relevant research does not yet exists in this field. In Korea, the Small and Medium Business Administration has implemented the "Support Program for the Individual Company Technology Roadmaps" to promote the establishment of technology development strategies by SMEs. This study developed the framework and indices for performance analysis, designed and implemented survey for TRM performance analysis, and analyzed TRM performance of the companies that have participated in the above program from 2008 to 2011. This study compared the supported 97 companies and 102 companies not supported and analyzed quantitative and qualitative performance and satisfaction levels among the supported companies to compare low-performance companies and high-performance companies. This study aims to examine the KSF of TRM in terms of input and process. Also we suggested significant insights into the performance of TRM in terms of output.

Keywords

References

  1. Brown, R. and O'Hare S. (2001) The use of technology roadmapping as an enabler of knowledge management, The institution of electrical engineers Seminar Managing Knowledge for Competitive Advantage.
  2. Destatte, P. (2007) Evaluation of Foresight: how to take long term impacts into consideration? FOR-LEARN Mutual Learning Workshop-Evaluation of Foresight, Brussels.
  3. Georghiou, L. et al. (2005) Evaluation of national foresight activities: assessing rationale, process and impact, Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 73(7), 761-777.
  4. Kappel, T. (2001) Perspectives on roadmaps: how organizations talk about the future, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 18(1), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0737-6782(00)00066-7
  5. Kostoff, R. and Schaller, R. (2001) Science and technology roadmaps, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 48(2), 132-143. https://doi.org/10.1109/17.922473
  6. Lee W.I. (2008a) Research on determinant for progress and use of TRM: organizational capability for using technology information, Journal of Information Management, 39(3), 177-198. https://doi.org/10.1633/JIM.2008.39.1.177
  7. Lee W.I. (2008b) Research on development of infra for strategic technology development by TRM: cases of 6 strategic technology development of KEPCO, Korean Management Consulting Review, 8(4), 23-37.
  8. Lee J.H. et al. (2011) An empirical analysis of the determinants of technology roadmap utilization, R&D Management, 41(5), 485-508. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2011.00657.x
  9. Li, S. et al. (2009) Developing the evaluation framework of technology foresight program: lesson learned from European countries, Science and Innovation Policy Atlanta Conference on Science and Innovation Policy 2009.
  10. McCarthy, R. (2003) Linking technological change to business needs, Research Technology Management, 46(2), 47-52.
  11. Petrick, I. and Echols, A. (2004) Technology roadmapping in review: a tool for making sustainable new product development decisions, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 71(1-2), 81-100 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-1625(03)00064-7
  12. Phaal, R, Farrukh, C., Mills, J. and Probert, D. (2003) Customizing the technology roadmapping approach, Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET 03).
  13. Phaal, R. Farrukh, C., Probert, D. (2003) Technology roadmapping: a planning framework for evolution and revolution, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 71(1-2), 5-26.
  14. Rinne, M. (2004) Technology roadmap: infrastructure for innovation, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 71(1-2), 81-100. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-1625(03)00064-7

Cited by

  1. Measuring the dynamics of an innovation system using patent data: a case study of South Korea, 2001–2010 vol.49, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-014-0045-4
  2. Determinants of Technology Transfer and Commercialization in National Research and Development: Focusing on Korea Railroad Research Projects vol.7, pp.3, 2013, https://doi.org/10.7545/ajip.2018.7.3.438