DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

급배기 방식 개선에 따른 생물안전 밀폐시설의 Risk Assessment와 초기 건설비 저감에 대한 연구

A Study on the Risk Assessment and Reduction of Initial Construction Cost in a Biosafety Laboratory According to Improvement of Supply and Exhaust Method

  • Hwang, Ji Hyun (Department of Building Equipment and System Eng., Graduate School of Gachon University) ;
  • Hong, Jin Kwan (Department of Building Equipment and System Eng., Gachon University) ;
  • Ju, Young Duk (Department of Building Services, Naracontrols INC.)
  • 투고 : 2013.02.20
  • 발행 : 2013.10.10

초록

In general, entire supply air of the BSL3 laboratory should be vented to the outside for its biosafety and the air conditioning system should always be operating to maintain a room pressure difference. In this regard, annual energy consumption is approximately five or ten times greater than the magnitude of the office building. In addition, to adjust room pressure difference to the set value efficiently, the supply and exhaust duct system are installed in each room of the BSL3 lab. Thus, initial construction cost is extremely high. In this study, multizone simulation is performed to estimate maintaining the appropriate room pressure difference in the case of changing model A (each room supply and exhaust system) to model B (each zone supply and exhaust system) for verification of the BSL3 lab biosafety. Also, in the case of these two models, the multizone simulation for three kinds of biohazard scenario is performed as part of risk assessment. The analysis of initial construction cost of two models is conducted for comparison. According to the studies, initial construction cost of model B is less than about 22% of existing model A. Moreover, biosafety of the BSL3 lab is still maintaining in the case of the two models.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Laboratories for the 21st Century, An Introduction to Low-Energy Design, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Administration and Resources Management, 2000.
  2. Hong, J. K., 2010, A Case Study on the Validation of BSL3 Laboratory and Engineering Cost Evaluation of BSL3 Laboratory, Design, Construction and Validation Workshop of BSL3 Laboratory, Journal of SAREK, pp. 229-253.
  3. Korea Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Guideline of Laboratory Biosafety, 2006.
  4. McDowell, T. P., Thornton, J. W., Emmerich, S., and Walton, G., 2003, Integration of airflow and energy simulation using CONTAM and TRANSYS, ASHRAE transaction, Vol. 109, No. 2, kc-03-10-2.
  5. Park, H. J. and Hong, J. K., 2010, A Study on the Numerical Prediction of Indoor Environment in Bio Safety Level 3 Laboratory according to Infiltration Rate, Journal of SAREK, pp. 557-563.
  6. Park, H. J. and Hong, J. K., 2012, An Analytical Study on the Prediction of Indoor Air Quality and the Reduction of Air Conditioning Load in Bio Safety Level 3 Laboratory, Journal of SAREK, Vol. 24, No. 11, pp. 813-823. https://doi.org/10.6110/KJACR.2012.24.11.813
  7. National Technical Information Service U.S. Department of Commerce Springfield, VA 22161.
  8. McDowell, T. P., Thornton, J. W., Emmerich, S., and Walton, G., 2003, Integration of airflow and energy simulation using CONTAM and TRANSYS, ASHRAE transaction, Vol. 109, No. 2, kc-03-10-2.
  9. Jin, B. F. and Andrew, K, P., 1995, Computer Simulations of Airflow and Radon Transport in Four Large Buildings, NISTIR 5611.
  10. Walton, G. N., 2005, CONTAM 2.4 User Guide and Program Documentation, NISTIR 7251.
  11. Park, H. J. and Hong, J. K., 2010, A Study on the Prediction of Indoor Environment in Bio Safety Level 3 Laboratory according to Biohazard Scenario, Journal of SAREK, Vol. 22, No. 11, pp. 745-750.
  12. ASHRAE Standard 52.2-1999, Method of Testing General Ventilation Air-Cleaning Devices for Removal Efficiency by Particle Size, American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers, 2000.