The Journal of the Korean dental association (대한치과의사협회지)

The Korean Dental Association (대한치과의사협회)
권호 표지

CBCT Imaging for Dental Implants

임상가를 위한 특집 2 - 임플란트시술을 위한 CBCT의 활용

  • An, Seo-Young (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, School of Dentistry, Kyungpook National University)
  • 안서영 (경북대학교 치의학전문대학원)
  • Received : 2012.03.19
  • Accepted : 2012.03.26
  • Published : 2012.04.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Various imaging modalities have been used for dental implant assessment in the different stages of implant treatment. Basic imaging, such as panoramic and periapical radiographs, are generally useful and cost-effective but do not provide the cross-sectional visualization or interactive image analysis that can be obtained with more sophisticated imaging techniques, such as Cone-Beam Computed Tomography(CBCT) imaging. This article includes the applications of CBCT imaging and their diagnostic contribution to presurgical evaluation, treatment planning, and postoperative assessment of dental implants.

Keywords

References

  1. Angelopoulos C, Aghaloo T. Imaging technology in implant diagnosis. Dent Clin North Am. 2011; 55 : 141-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cden.2010.08.001
  2. Benavides E, Rios HF, Ganz SD, An CH, Resnik R, Reardon GT et al. Use of Cone Beam Computed Tomography in Implant Dentistry: The International Congress of Oral Implantologists Consensus Report. Implant Dent. 2012 Mar 1. [Epub ahead of print]
  3. Guncu GN, Yildirim YD, Wang HL, Tozum TF. Location of posterior superior alveolar artery and evaluation of maxillary sinus anatomy with computerized tomography: a clinical study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011 ; 22 : 1164-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02071.x
  4. Hyung-Soo Choi, Gyu-Tae Kim, Yong-Suk Choi, Eui- Hwan Hwang. Surgical stent for dental implant using cone beam CT images. Korean J Oral Maxillofac Radiol 2010; 40 : 171-8.
  5. Naitoh M, Nakahara K, Suenaga Y, Gotoh K, Kondo S, Ariji E. Comparison between cone-beam and multislice computed tomography depicting mandibular neurovascular canal structures. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2010; 109 : e25-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.08.027
  6. Parnia F, Fard EM, Mahboub F, Hafezeqoran A, Gavgani FE. Tomographic volume evaluation of submandibular fossa in patients requiring dental implants. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2010; 109 : e32-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.08.035
  7. Romanos GE, Greenstein G. The incisive canal. Considerations during implant placement: case report and literature review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009; 24 : 740-5.
  8. Rouas P, Nancy J, Bar D. Identification of double mandibular canals: literature review and three case reports with CT scans and cone beam CT. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2007; 36 : 34-8. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/27374727
  9. Sam-Sun Lee, Soon-Chul Choi, Radiographic examination for successful dental implant. Korean J Oral Maxillofacial Radiol 2005; 35 : 63-8
  10. Scaravilli MS, Mariniello M, Sammartino G. Mandibular lingual vascular canals (MLVC): evaluation on dental CTs of a case series. Eur J Radiol. 2010; 76 : 173-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.06.002
  11. Schulze R, Heil U, Gross D, Bruellmann DD, Dranischnikow E, Schwanecke U et al. Artefacts in CBCT: a review. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2011; 40 : 265-73. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/30642039
  12. Schulze RK, Berndt D, d'Hoedt B. On cone-beam computed tomography artifacts induced by titanium implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010; 21 : 100-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01817.x
  13. Shen EC, Fu E, Chiu TJ, Chang V, Chiang CY, Tu HP. Prevalence and location of maxillary sinus septa in the Taiwanese population and relationship to the absence of molars. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011 doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02195.x. [Epub ahead of print]
  14. White SC, Pharoah MJ. Oral radiology; principles and interpretation. 6th ed. St. Louis: Mosby-Year Book Inc; 2009. p. 597-612.