Genomics & Informatics

  • 제10권3호
  • /
  • Pages.206-211
  • /
  • 2012
  • /
  • 1598-866X(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2234-0742(eISSN)
한국유전체학회 (Korea Genome Organization)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

DNA Barcoding of Fish, Insects, and Shellfish in Korea

  • Kim, Dae-Won (Division of Malaria and Parasitic Diseases, Korea National Institute of Health) ;
  • Yoo, Won-Gi (Codes Division, Insilicogen Inc.) ;
  • Park, Hyun-Chul (Forensic DNA Center, National Forensic Service) ;
  • Yoo, Hye-Sook (Korea Biobank, Center for Genome Science, Korea National Institute of Health) ;
  • Kang, Dong-Won (Division of Natural History, National Science Museum) ;
  • Jin, Seon-Deok (Division of Natural History, National Science Museum) ;
  • Min, Hong-Ki (Natural History Museum, Hannam University) ;
  • Paek, Woon-Kee (Division of Natural History, National Science Museum) ;
  • Lim, Jeong-Heui (School of Biotechnology, Yeungnam University)
  • 투고 : 2012.07.17
  • 심사 : 2012.08.13
  • 발행 : 2012.09.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

DNA barcoding has been widely used in species identification and biodiversity research. A short fragment of the mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) sequence serves as a DNA bio-barcode. We collected DNA barcodes, based on COI sequences from 156 species (529 sequences) of fish, insects, and shellfish. We present results on phylogenetic relationships to assess biodiversity the in the Korean peninsula. Average GC% contents of the 68 fish species (46.9%), the 59 shellfish species (38.0%), and the 29 insect species (33.2%) are reported. Using the Kimura 2 parameter in all possible pairwise comparisons, the average interspecific distances were compared with the average intraspecific distances in fish (3.22 vs. 0.41), insects (2.06 vs. 0.25), and shellfish (3.58 vs. 0.14). Our results confirm that distance-based DNA barcoding provides sufficient information to identify and delineate fish, insect, and shellfish species by means of all possible pairwise comparisons. These results also confirm that the development of an effective molecular barcode identification system is possible. All DNA barcode sequences collected from our study will be useful for the interpretation of species-level identification and community-level patterns in fish, insects, and shellfish in Korea, although at the species level, the rate of correct identification in a diversified environment might be low.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Ward RD, Hanner R, Hebert PD. The campaign to DNA barcode all fishes, FISH-BOL. J Fish Biol 2009;74:329-356. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.2008.02080.x
  2. Kress WJ, Erickson DL. DNA barcodes: genes, genomics, and bioinformatics. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2008;105:2761-2762. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0800476105
  3. Chu KH, Xu M, Li CP. Rapid DNA barcoding analysis of large datasets using the composition vector method. BMC Bioinformatics 2009;10 Suppl 14:S8. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-10-S14-S8
  4. Hebert PD, Cywinska A, Ball SL, deWaard JR. Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Proc Biol Sci 2003;270: 313-321. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2002.2218
  5. Singer GA, Hajibabaei M. iBarcode.org: web-based molecular biodiversity analysis. BMC Bioinformatics 2009;10 Suppl 6: S14. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-10-S6-S14
  6. Elias M, Hill RI, Willmott KR, Dasmahapatra KK, Brower AV, Mallet J, et al. Limited performance of DNA barcoding in a diverse community of tropical butterflies. Proc Biol Sci 2007; 274:2881-2889. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2007.1035
  7. Hajibabaei M, Janzen DH, Burns JM, Hallwachs W, Hebert PD. DNA barcodes distinguish species of tropical Lepidoptera. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2006;103:968-971. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0510466103
  8. Ward RD, Zemlak TS, Innes BH, Last PR, Hebert PD. DNA barcoding Australia's fish species. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2005;360:1847-1857. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2005.1716
  9. Goole maps. Seoul: Google, 2012. Accessed 2012 Jul 16. Available from: http://maps.google.co.kr.
  10. Folmer O, Black M, Hoeh W, Lutz R, Vrijenhoek R. DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates. Mol Mar Biol Biotechnol 1994;3:294-299.
  11. McGinnis S, Madden TL. BLAST: at the core of a powerful and diverse set of sequence analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res 2004;32:W20-W25. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkh435
  12. Kimura M. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol 1980;16:111-120. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01731581
  13. Tamura K, Dudley J, Nei M, Kumar S. MEGA4: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. Mol Biol Evol 2007;24:1596-1599. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msm092
  14. Du H, Hu H, Meng Y, Zheng W, Ling F, Wang J, et al. The correlation coefficient of GC content of the genome-wide genes is positively correlated with animal evolutionary relationships. FEBS Lett 2010;584:3990-3994. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.febslet.2010.08.003

피인용 문헌

  1. Molecular identification and morphological characteristics of native and invasive Asian brush-clawed crabs (Crustacea: Brachyura) from Japanese and German coasts: Hemigrapsus penicillatus (De Haan, 1835) versus Hemigrapsus takanoi Asakura & Watanabe 2005 vol.14, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13127-014-0176-4
  2. New observations of the enigmatic West African Cellana limpet (Mollusca: Gastropoda: Nacellidae) vol.9, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1186/s41200-016-0059-9
  3. Pallas (Teleostei: Syngnathidae) based on morphological and molecular characters vol.64, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1080/09397140.2018.1444569