Journal of The Korean Society of Grassland and Forage Science (한국초지조사료학회지)

The Korean Society of Grassland and Forage Science (한국초지조사료학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effects of Ensiling Method on Nutritive Values and Quality of Sorghum × Sorghum Hybrid (SSH) Silage in Different Locations of SSH Silage

수수 × 수수 교잡종 톤백과 소포장 사일리지 제조방법이 사일리지 부위별 사료가치 및 품질에 미치는 영향

  • 임영철 (농촌진흥청 국립축산과학원) ;
  • 류재혁 (농촌진흥청 국립축산과학원) ;
  • 정민웅 (농촌진흥청 국립축산과학원) ;
  • 박형수 (농촌진흥청 국립축산과학원) ;
  • 김다혜 (농촌진흥청 국립축산과학원) ;
  • 김천만 (농촌진흥청 국립축산과학원) ;
  • 김종근 (농촌진흥청 국립축산과학원) ;
  • 최기준 (농촌진흥청 국립축산과학원) ;
  • 김원호 (농촌진흥청 국립축산과학원) ;
  • 최기춘 (농촌진흥청 국립축산과학원)
  • Received : 2012.03.29
  • Accepted : 2012.07.15
  • Published : 2012.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study was carried out to investigate the effects of three different locations of Sorghum ${\times}$ sorghum hybrid (SSH) silage on nutritive values and qualities of SSH square bale silage (SSBS) and gunny bag silage (GBS). SSH "SS405" was sown at early May, harvested at heading stage and ensiled. Samples of SSH silage used in this study were collected in three different locations (outer, middle and inner). The content of crude protein (CP) in GBS showed a slightly decreased trend, as compared to SSBS. However, the contents of neutral detergent fiber (NDF) was significantly different between SSBS and SBS (p<0.05). However, The contents of CP, NDF, acid detergent fiber (ADF) and total digestible nutrient (TDN), and in vitro dry matter digestibility (IVDMD) were not different between the parts of SSH silage. Nutritive values of SSBS and SBS were not influenced by inoculation of lactic bacteria. The content of lactic acid in SSBS was decreased as compared to SBS, but there was no significant difference between SSBS and SBS. The content of acetic acid in SSBS was significantly decreased (p<0.05), as compared to SBS. In addition, the contents of lactic acid, acetic acid and butyric acid were not different between the parts of SSH silage. Therefore we suggest that nutritive values and quality of SSBS and SBS were not influenced by parts of sampling collected from these silages.

본 연구는 수수${\times}$수수 교잡종의 톤백 및 소포장 사일리지의 부위에 따른 사료가치 및 품질에 미치는 영향을 구명하기 위하여 천안에 위치한 국립축산과학원 자원개발부에서 수행되었다. 수수${\times}$수수 교잡종 SS405는 5월 초순에 파종한 다음 출수기에 수확하여 사일리지로 조제하였다. 톤백 사일리지의 조단백질 함량은 소포장 사일리지에 비해 약간 감소되었으나 통계적인 차이는 보이지 않았다. 그러나 NDF 및 TDN 함량에서는 톤백과 소포장 사일리지 사이에 유의적인 차이가 나타났다(p<0.05). 수수${\times}$수수 교잡종의 톤백 및 소포장 사일리지는 젖산균의 첨가유무에 상관없이 비슷한 함량을 보였으며 사일리지 부위별 조단백질, NDF, ADF 및 TDN 함량도 차이를 보이지 않았다. 사일리지 부위별 조단백질, NDF, ADF, TDN 함량 및 in vitro 건물소화율에서는 차이를 보이지 않았다. 톤백 곤포사일리지의 젖산 함량은 소포장 사일리지보다 감소하였으나 유의적인 차이는 나타나지 않았다. 그러나 톤백 곤포사일리지의 초산 함량은 소포장 사일리지보다 유의적으로 감소하였다(p<0.05). 또한 사일리지 부위별 젖산, 초산 및 낙산 함량은 큰 차이를 보이지 않았다. 따라서 본 연구의 결과를 요약하면 수수${\times}$수수 교잡종 소포장 및 톤백 사일리지의 부위별 사료가치와 품질은 부위에 따라 영향을 받지 않았다.

Keywords

References

  1. A.O.A.C. 1990. Official method of analysis. 15thed. Washington, DC. 15th ed. Washington, DC.
  2. Choi, K.C., M.W. Jung, W.H. Kim, C.M. Kim, S.H. Yoon, E.M. Choi, J.G. Kim, S.M. Lee, J.M. Choi, H.G. Kim and Y.C. Lim. 2011. Effect of harvest stage of Sorghum x Sorghum Hybrid (SSH) on the quality of round baled SSH silage. J. Kor. Grassal. Sci. 31(2):413-150. https://doi.org/10.5333/KGFS.2011.31.2.143
  3. Goering, H.K. and P.J. Van Soest. 1970. Forage fiber analysis. Agic. Handbook 379, U. S. Gov. Print. Office, Washington, DC.
  4. Hristove, A.N. and T.A. McAllister. 2002. Effect of inoculants on whole-crop barley silage fermentation and dry matter disappearance in situ. J. Anim. Sci. 80:510-516. https://doi.org/10.2527/2002.802510x
  5. Ji, H.C., J.K. Lee, K.Y. Kim, S.H. Yoon, Y.C. Lim, O.D. Kwon and H.B. Lee. 2009b. Evaluation of agronomic characteristics, forage production and quality of corn hybrids for silage at paddy field in southern region of Korea. J. Kor. Grassal. Sci. 29(1):13-18. https://doi.org/10.5333/KGFS.2009.29.1.013
  6. Ji, H.C., S.H. Lee, S.H. Yoon, O.D Kwon, G.J. Choi, W.H Kim, K.Y. Kim and Y.C. Lim. 2010a. Growth, forage production and quality of Sorghum, Sorghum x Sudangrass and Sudangrass Hybrids at paddy field in southern region of Korea. J. Kor. Grassal. Sci. 30(2):97-193. https://doi.org/10.5333/KGFS.2010.30.2.109
  7. Ji, H.J., S.H. Lee, S.H. Yoon, W.H. Kim and Y.C. Lim. 2010b. Growth, forage production and quality of Sorghum, Sorghum x Sudangrass and Sudangrass Hybrids at paddy field in middle region of Korea. J. Kor. Grassal. Sci. 30(1):1-8. https://doi.org/10.5333/KGFS.2010.30.1.009
  8. Ji, H.C., W.H. Kim, K.Y. Kim, S.H. Lee, S.H. Yoon and Y.C. Lim. 2009a. Effect of different drained conditions on growth, forage production and quality of silage corn at paddy field. J. Kor. Grassal. Sci. 29(4):329-336. https://doi.org/10.5333/KGFS.2009.29.4.329
  9. Kim, J.D., H.J. Lee, K.H. Jeon, G.Y. Yang, C.H. Kwon, H.G. Sung, S. Hwangbo and I.H. Jo. 2010. Effect of harvest stage, wilting and crushed rice on the forage production and silage quality of organic whole crop barely. J. Kor. Grassal. Sci. 30(1):25-34. https://doi.org/10.5333/KGFS.2010.30.1.025
  10. Kim, J.D, C.H. Kwon, J.G. Kim, C.H. Kim, H.K. Roh, Y.M. Yoon and J.K Lee. 2009. Forage production and utilization. Shin Kwang Co. Seoul. p 96.
  11. Kim, J.G., E.S. Chung, S. Seo, J.S. Ham, M.J. Kim and J.K. Lee. 2006b. Effects of wilting days on the quality of round baled grass silage. J. Kor. Grassal. Sci. 26(1):39-44. https://doi.org/10.5333/KGFS.2006.26.1.039
  12. Kim, J.K., E.S Chung, S. Seo, J.S. Ham, S.H. Yoon and Y.C. Lim. 2006a. Effects of inoculants on the quality of round baled grass silage. J. Kor. Grassal. Sci. 26(3):139-146. https://doi.org/10.5333/KGFS.2006.26.3.139
  13. Kim, J.G., E.S. Chung, S Seo, M.J. Kim, J.K. Lee, S.H. Yoon, Y.C. Lim and Y.M. Cho. 2008. Effect of growth stage and variety on the quality of whole crop rice silage. J. Kor. Grassal. Sci. 28(1):29-34. https://doi.org/10.5333/KGFS.2008.28.1.029
  14. Kim, S.R., G.S. Kim, J.H. Woo, J.W. Lee and K.I. Sung. 2004. Chemical composition and fermentation characteristics of storage sections of the round bale silage of fresh rice straw at Yonchon of Gyeonggi-do. J. Kor. Grassal. Sci. 24 (3):253-260. https://doi.org/10.5333/KGFS.2004.24.3.253
  15. Lim, H.J., J.D. Kim, H.J. Lee, K.H. Jeon, Y.K. Young, C.H. Kwon and S.H. Yoon. 2009. Effect of pre-wilting on the forage quality of organic Sorghum×Sudangrass silage. Kor. J. Org. Agricult. 17(4):519-527.
  16. Moore, J.E. 1970. Procedure for the two-stage in vitro digestion of forage. Univ. of Florida, Depart. of Anim. Sci.
  17. Shin, J.S., J.M Choi, E.M. Kim, W.H. Kim and M.W. Jung. 2009. Square silage wrapping compressor. Korea Institute of Patent Information. IPC Code A23N 17/00 (2006.01), no. 1020090003621 (2009.01.16.).
  18. Shin, J.S., W.H. Kim, S.H. Yoon, Y.C. Lim, K.B. Lim and S. Seo 2008. Comparison of growth characteristics and yields of autumn-sowing annual legumes in paddy field of central provinces. J. Kor. Grassal. Sci. 28(1):13-18. https://doi.org/10.5333/KGFS.2008.28.1.013
  19. Smith, E.J., A.R. Henderson, J.D. Oldham, D.A. Whitaker, K. Aitcheson, D.H. Anderson and J. M. Kelly. 1993. The influence of an inoculant/enzyme preparation as an additive for grass silage offered in combination with three levels of concentrate supplementation on performance of lactating dairy cows. Anim. Prod. 56:301-310. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003356100006334
  20. Song, T.H., O.K. Han, S.K. Yun, T.I. Park, K.H. Kim and K.J. Kim. 2009. Effect of pre-wilting time on change of the moisture content and its silage quality at different harvest stages of whole crop barley. Kor. J. Intl. Agr. 21(4):316-321.
  21. Steen, R.E.J., E.F. Unsworth, H.I. Gracey, S.J. Kennedy, R. Anderson and D.J. Kilpatrick. 1989. Evaluation studies in the development of a commercial bacterial inoculant as an additive for grass silage. 3. Responses in growing cattle and interaction with protein supplementation. Grass Forage Sci. 44:381-390. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2494.1989.tb01936.x