DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

시간-온도 중첩이론을 적용한 아스팔트 바인더의 점소성 구성 모형

A Viscoplastic Constitutive Model Based on Overstress Concept with Time-Temperature Superposition Principle

  • 투고 : 2012.07.05
  • 심사 : 2012.09.21
  • 발행 : 2012.10.15

초록

PURPOSES: Suggestion of asphalt binder constitutive model based on time-temperature superposition principle and overstress concept in order to describe behavior of asphalt binders. METHODS: A series of temperature sweep tests and multiple stress creep and recovery(MSCR) tests are performed to verify the applicability of time-temperature superposition principle(t-Ts) and to develop viscoelastoplastic constitutive equation based on overstress concept. For the tests, temperature sweep tests at various high temperature and various frequency and MSCR test at $58^{\circ}C$, $64^{\circ}C$ $70^{\circ}C$, $76^{\circ}C$, and $82^{\circ}C$ are performed. From the temperature sweep tests, dynamic shear modulus mastercurve and time-temperature shift function are built and the shift function and MSCR at $58^{\circ}C$ are utilized to determine model coefficients of VBO model. RESULTS: It is observed that the time-temperature shift function built at low strain level of 0.1% is applicable not only to 1.0% strain level temperature sweep test but also maximum 500,00% strain level of MSCR test. As well, the modified VBO model shows perfect prediction on MSCR measured strain at the other temperatures. CONCLUSIONS: The Time-temperature superposition principle stands hold from very low strain level to very high strain level and that the modified VBO model can be applicable for various range of strain and temperature region to predict elastic, viscoelastic, and viscoplastic strain of asphalt binders.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Anderson DA, Kennedy TW, 1993. Development of SHRP Binder Specification. Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists. Vol. 64, 481-507.
  2. Andrew J. Hanz, Zelalem A. Arega, Hussain U. Bahia, 2009. Rheological Evaluation of Emulsion Residues Recovered Using Newly Proposed Evaporative Technique, Transportation Research Board
  3. Angelo DJ, Kluttz R, Dongre RN, 2007. Revision of the Superpave High Temperature Binder Specification: The Multiple Stress Creep Recovery Test. Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists. 123-162.
  4. Airey GD, BROWN S, 1998. Rheological Performance of Aged Polyer Modified Bitumens. Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, Vol. 67. 66-100.
  5. AASHTO TP 70. 2009. Standard Method of Test for Multiple Stress Creep Recovery(MSCR) Test of Asphalt Binder Using a Dynamic Shear Rehometer (DSR).
  6. AASHTO TP 70. 2009. Standard Method of Test for Multiple Stress Creep Recovery(MSCR) Test of Asphalt Binder Using a Dynamic Shear Rehometer (DSR). AASHTO 2009.
  7. Bahia HU, Anderson DA, Christensen DW, 1992. The Bending Beam Rheometer; A Simple Device for Measuring Low-Temperature Rheology of Asphalt Binders. Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, Vol. 61. 117-153.
  8. Gibson NH., Schwartz CW, Schapery RA., Witczak MW, 2003. Viscoelastic, Viscoplastic, and Damage Modeling of Asphalt Concrete in Unconfined Compression. Transportation Research Record. Vol. 1860. 3-15. https://doi.org/10.3141/1860-01
  9. Ho KS., 2006. Unified Constitutive Equations of Viscoplastic Deformation: Development and Capabilities. International Journal of Japan Society Mecahnical Engineering. Vol. 49. 138-146.
  10. Kim YR, Chehab G., 2004. Development of Viscoelastic Continuum Damage Model for Asphalt-Aggregate Mixtures. Arizona State University.
  11. Krempl E., 1986. Viscoplasticty Based on Overstress with a Differential Growth Law for The Equilibrium Stress. Mechanics of Materials. Vol. 5. 35-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6636(86)90014-1
  12. Krempl E. 1987. Models of Viscoplasticity-Some Comments on Equilibrium (Back) Stress and Drag Stress. Acta Mech, Vol. 69. 25-42. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01175712
  13. Krempl E, Khan F., 2003. Rate(Time)-Dependent Deformation Behavior: an Overview of Some Properties of Metal and Solid Polymers. International Journal of Plasticity. Vol. 19. 1069-1095. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-6419(03)00002-0
  14. Masad EA, Huang CW, DAngelo J, Little DN., 2009. Characterization of Asphalt Binder Resistance to Permanent Deformation Based on Nonlinear Viscoelastic Analysis of Multiple Stress Creep Recovery (MSCR) Test. Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, Vol. 78. 535-566.
  15. Nader Tabatabaee, Hassan Ali Tabatabaee, 2010. Multiple Stress Creep and Recovery Time Sweep Fatigue Test: Crumb Rubber Modified Binder and Mixture Performance, Transportation Research Board.
  16. Perzyna P. "Thermodynamic Theory of Viscoplasticity." Advances in Applied Mechanics 1971; 11; 313-354. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2156(08)70345-4
  17. Prager W. A New Method of Analyzing Stresses and Strains in Work Hardening Plastic Solids. Journal of Applied Mechanics 1956; 23;. 493-496.
  18. Rowe GM, Sharrock MJ, Bouldin MG, .Dongre RN, 2001. Advanced Techniques to Develop Asphalt Master Curves From The Bending Beam Rheometer. Petroleum and Coal, Vol. 43. 54-59.
  19. Schapery RA. 1961. A Simple Collocation Method for Fitting Viscoelastic Models to Experimental Data. California Institute of Technology, Pasadena CA.
  20. Uzan J. 1996. Asphalt Concrete Characterization for Pavement Performance Prediction. Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists. Vol. 65. 573-607.
  21. Yun T, Underwood BS, Kim YR., 2010. Time-Temperature Superposition for HMA with Growing Damage and Permanent Strain in Confined Tesion and Compression. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, Vol. 22. 415-422. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000039
  22. Yun T., Eum BS., Yoo PJ., Performance Evaluation of Polymer Modifed Asphalt Binder with PG Testing Protocols. Journal of Korean Society of Road Engineers (Accepted).