The Influence of Organizational Commitment, Job Commitment and Job Satisfaction on Professionalism Perceived by Radiotechnologists Working in the Department of Radiation Oncology

방사선종양학과에 근무하는 방사선사의 조직몰입, 직무몰입, 직무만족이 전문 직업성에 미치는 영향

  • Gim, Yang-Soo (Department of Radiation Oncology, Chunbuk National University Hospital) ;
  • Lee, Sun-Young (Department of Radiation Oncology, Chunbuk National University Hospital) ;
  • Lee, Joon-Seong (Department of Radiation Oncology, Chunbuk National University Hospital) ;
  • Gwak, Geun-Tak (Department of Radiation Oncology, Chunbuk National University Hospital) ;
  • Pak, Ju-Gyeong (Department of Radiation Oncology, Chunbuk National University Hospital) ;
  • Lee, Seung-Hoon (Department of Radiation Oncology, Chunbuk National University Hospital) ;
  • Hwang, Ho-In (Department of Radiation Oncology, Chunbuk National University Hospital) ;
  • Cha, Seok-Yong (Department of Radiation Oncology, Chunbuk National University Hospital)
  • 김양수 (전북대학교병원 방사선종양학과) ;
  • 이선영 (전북대학교병원 방사선종양학과) ;
  • 이준성 (전북대학교병원 방사선종양학과) ;
  • 곽근택 (전북대학교병원 방사선종양학과) ;
  • 박주경 (전북대학교병원 방사선종양학과) ;
  • 이승훈 (전북대학교병원 방사선종양학과) ;
  • 황호인 (전북대학교병원 방사선종양학과) ;
  • 차석용 (전북대학교병원 방사선종양학과)
  • Received : 2012.06.19
  • Accepted : 2012.08.10
  • Published : 2012.09.30

Abstract

Purpose: The study is to check the specialty of radiotherapists working in the department of radiation oncology and find job satisfaction, organizational commitment and job commitment having an effect on professional parts. After making analysis of the mutual relation, it is to provide radiotechnologists with making progress in the future. Materials and Methods: From March 2 to March 30, we had carried out a survey with email. It is possible to have 272 questionnaires answered in the survey. We make use of SPSS 13.0 for Windows to analyze the data collected for study. Frequency and a percentage are meant to show general characteristics, and t-test and ANOVA to do the difference between general properties and professionalism. Pearson's correlation coefficient also is meant to do the correlation of professionalism, organizational job commitment and job satisfaction, and multiple regression analysis to do the factor for a relevant variable to affect professionalism. Results: There are subdivisions in the professionalism informing us of the self-regulation $17.74{\pm}2.32/3.55{\pm}.46$, a sense of calling $17.58{\pm}2.63/3.52{\pm}.53$, reference of the professional $17.14{\pm}2.39/3.43{\pm}.48$, service to the public $15.97{\pm}2.48/3.19{\pm}50$, and autonomy $15.68{\pm}2.28/3.14{\pm}46$. Grand mean turns out to be $83.89{\pm}7.63$(Summation of items)/$3.37{\pm}0.49$ (Numbers of items). When it comes to a statistical relation between general characteristics and professionalism, the statistics have it that these come within age (P<.001), period of employment (P<.001), education status (P<.05), a monthly income (P<.001), radiotherapists who get a special license (P<.001), the position (P<.001), and an opportunity for developing (P<.001). As a result of organizational commitment, job commitment, and job satisfaction, grand mean in organizational commitment proves to be $80.10{\pm}8.15/3.34{\pm}.34$. There are subvisions showing affective commitment $28.64{\pm}4.61$/3.58, continuance commitment $27.54{\pm}4.22/3.44{\pm}.53$, and normative commitment $23.95{\pm}2.94/2.99{\pm}.37$ in order of precedence. The average grade in job commitment is $32.47{\pm}5.77/3.30{\pm}.60$ and that in job satisfaction is $63.39{\pm}10.16/3.17{\pm}.51$, respectively. We find the positive relationship between professionalism and organizational commitment (r=.522, P<.05), between professionalism and job commitment (r=.444, P<.05), and between professionalism and job satisfaction (r=.507, P<.05). And we also get the positive relationship between organizational commitment and job commitment (r=.549, P<.05), between organizational commitment and job satisfaction (r=.433, P<.05), and between job commitment and job satisfaction (r=.462, P<.05). To catch the factors influencing the professionalism of radiotherapists, we used multiple regression analysis. According to the final model, it appears affective commitment (B=.755, P<.05), normative commitment (B=.305, P<.05), job satisfaction (B=.092, P<.05), an opportunity for developing (B=-1.505, P<.05), and the position (B=-1.155, P<.05) in order of precedence. It seems that explaining influece on $R^2$ is 0.504. Conclusion: The results of the factors that influence professionalism working as radiotherapists in the department of radiation oncology have it that the more affective commitment, normative commitment, and job satisfaction we feel, the more professionalism we recognize. We think that the focus of professionalism is increased if getting the chances for radiotherapists to have little to do with developing opportunities given.

목 적: 본 연구는 방사선종양학과에 근무하는 방사선사들의 전문 직업성을 확인하고, 조직몰입, 직무몰입, 직무만족이 전문직업성에 미치는 영향요인을 파악하며, 이들 상호관련성을 분석하여 향후 방사선사들의 전문 직업성 향상을 위한 기초자료로 제공하고자 시행하였다. 대상 및 방법: 본 연구는 2012년 3월 2일부터 3월 30일까지 방사선종양학과에 근무하는 방사선사를 대상으로 E-mail 설문조사를 하였으며, 설문 응답자 272명 대상으로 하였다. 자료는 SPSS 13.0 for Window를 사용하여 분석하였다. 일반적 특성은 빈도, 백분율로 제시하였으며, 일반적 특성과 전문 직업성 차이는 t-test와 ANOVA를, 전문 직업성, 조직/직무몰입, 직무만족과의 상관관계는 Pearson Correlation 계수를 사용하였으며, 관련변인이 전문 직업성에 영향을 미치는 요인은 다단계 다중회귀분석을 적용하여 분석하였다. 결 과: 전문 직업성 정도는 하위영역에서 자체규정에 대한 신념 $17.74{\pm}2.32/3.55{\pm}.46$, 소명의식 $17.58{\pm}2.63/3.52{\pm}.53$, 전문조직의 준거성 $17.14{\pm}2.39/3.43{\pm}.48$, 공적 서비스 $15.97{\pm}2.48/3.19{\pm}.50$, 자율성 $15.68{\pm}2.28/3.14{\pm}.46$점 순의 결과를 보였으며, 전체 평균은 $83.89{\pm}7.63$점(Summation of Items)/$3.37{\pm}.49$점(Numbers of Items)이었다. 일반적 특성과 전문 직업성의 통계적 관계에서는 연령(P<.001), 근무기간(P<.001), 교육수준(P<.05), 월수입(P<.001), 전문방사선사 자격증취득 유무(P<.001), 직위(P<.001), 전문성 발전기회(P<.001) 등이 통계적으로 유의하였다. 조직몰입, 직무 몰입, 직무 만족의 결과는 조직몰입 전체 평균$80.10{\pm}8.15/3.34{\pm}.34$이며, 하위영역에서 정서몰입 $28.64{\pm}4.61/3.58{\pm}.58$, 유지적 몰입 $27.54{\pm}4.22/3.44{\pm}.53$, 규범적 몰입 $23.95{\pm}2.94/2.99{\pm}.37$ 순으로 높게 나타났으며, 직무몰입의 평균점수는 $32.47{\pm}5.77/3.30{\pm}.60$, 직무만족의 평균점수는 $63.39{\pm}10.16/3.17{\pm}.51$점이었다. 전문 직업성과 조직 몰입, 직무 몰입, 직무 만족의 상관관계는 전문 직업성은 조직몰입과 정적인 상관관계(r=.522, P<.05), 직무몰입과 정적 상관관계(r=.444, P<.05), 직무만족과 정적 상관관계(r=.507, P<.05)를 보였으며, 조직몰입은 직무몰입과 정적 상관관계(r=.549, P<.05), 직무만족과 정적 상관관계(r=.433, P<.05)를 보였으며, 직무몰입은 직무만족과 정적 상관관계(r=.462, P<.05)를 나타냈다. 다중회귀분석의 결과를 보면 최종모형은 정서몰입(B=.755, P<.05), 규범적 몰입(B=.305, P<.05), 직무만족(B=.092, P<.05), 전문성발전기회(B=-1.505, P<.05), 직위(B=-1.155, P<.05) 순으로 나타났으며, 미치는 영향을 설명하는 $R^2$=.504로 나타났다. 결 론: 방사선종양학과에 근무하는 방사선사들의 전문 직업성 정도와 미치는 영향 요인의 결과는 정서몰입, 규범몰입, 직무만족이 높을수록 전문 직업성 높으며, 전문성 발전기회가 적고 직위가 낮은 방사선사들에게 좀 더 다양하고 많은 기회가 주어진다면 전문 직업에 대한 의식이 높아질 것으로 생각된다.

Keywords