DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Diffusion of Web 2.0 Applications in Academic Libraries in the U.S.

미국 대학 도서관에서의 웹 2.0 어플리케이션 확산에 관한 연구

  • 김수정 (전북대학교 문헌정보학과, 인문영상연구소)
  • Received : 2012.08.13
  • Accepted : 2012.09.15
  • Published : 2012.09.30

Abstract

This paper examines the extent and rate of adoption of five Web 2.0 applications (RSS, blog, tagging, podcast, and wiki) in 111 American Research Association (ARL) libraries and identifies institutional factors associated with Web 2.0 adoption. The popularity of Web 2.0 continues to grow, both in terms of the total number of adopting libraries and the adoption rate. Wiki adopter libraries are in larger universities, have larger professional staff, and are more acceptable to electronic resources than the non-adopters.

본 연구는 111개 북미연구도서관협회 멤버 도서관들을 대상으로 RSS, 블로그, 태깅, 팟캐스트, 위키 등 다섯 가지 종류의 웹 2.0 어플리케이션의 수용 정도와 확산 속도를 조사하였고 확산과 관련한 기관 차원의 요인을 파악하였다. 결과적으로 웹 2.0을 수용한 전체 도서관 수와 확산 속도로 미루어 보아 웹 2.0 기술은 계속해서 증가하고 있는 것으로 나타났다. 또한 위키를 수용한 도서관들은 수용하지 않은 도서관들에 비하여 대체로 대규모 사이즈의 대학에 속해 있고, 직원 수가 많으며, 전자 자료에 대한 수용도가 높은 것으로 밝혀졌다.

Keywords

References

  1. 이현실. 2007. 대학도서관 2.0에서 사서의 업무 방향. 한국비블리아학회지, 18(1): 147-168.
  2. 이응봉. 2007. 학술도서관 디지털정보서비스의 향후 전망. 한국문헌정보학회지, 41(2): 181-202.
  3. 이지연, 민지연. 2008. 라이브러리 2.0에 대한 이용자 인식 및 요구사항에 관한 실증적 연구. 한국문헌정보학회지, 42(1): 213-231.
  4. 노영희. 2010. 도서관 3.0의 개념과 서비스 모형에 관한 연구. 정보관리학회지, 27(4): 283-307.
  5. 신수연, 김성민. 2010. 도서관 2.0 시대의 사서 2.0에게 기대되는 역할에 관한 연구. 정보관리학회지, 27(2): 201-216.
  6. Association of Research Libraries (ARL). 2011. Machine-Readable ARL Statistics 2008-2009. [cited 2012.6.21]. .
  7. Bennington, A. 2007. "Stick It in Your Ear: Keeping Current with Podcasts." Online, 31: 30-32.
  8. Boxen, J. L. 2008. "Library 2.0: A Review of the Literature." The Reference Librarian, 49: 21-34. https://doi.org/10.1080/02763870802103597
  9. Chatfield, A. J., M. A. Ratajeski, J. Wang, and T. P. Bardyn. 2010. "Communicating with Faculty, Staff, and Students Using Library Blogs: Results from a Survey of Academic Health Sciences Libraries." Internet Reference Services Quarterly, 15: 149-168. https://doi.org/10.1080/10875301.2010.502452
  10. Corrocher, N. 2011. "The Adoption of Web 2.0 Services: An Empirical Investigation." Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 78: 547-558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2010.10.006
  11. Clyde, L. A. 2004. "Library Weblogs." Library Management, 25: 183-189. https://doi.org/10.1108/01435120410533765
  12. Crawford, W. 2006. "Library 2.0 and 'Library 2.0'." Cites & Insights: Crawford at Large, 6: 32.
  13. Harinarayana, N. S. and N. V. Raju. 2010. "Web 2.0 Features in University Library Web Sites." The Electronic Library, 28: 69-88. https://doi.org/10.1108/02640471011023388
  14. Helgren, J. E. and Z. Lietzau. 2011. "U.S. Public Libraries and Web Technologies: What's Happening Now?" Computers in Libraries, 31: 12-16.
  15. Kim, Y. and J. Abbas. 2010. "Adoption of Library 2.0 Functionalities by Academic Libraries and Users: A Knowledge Management Perspective." Journal of Academic Librarianship, 36: 211-218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2010.03.003
  16. Liu, S. 2008. "Engaging Users: The Future of Academic Library Web Sites." College & Research Libraries, 69: 6-27. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.69.1.6
  17. Mahmood, K. and J. V. Richardson Jr. 2011. "Adoption of Web 2.0 in US Academic Libraries: A Survey of ARL Library Websites." Program: Electronic Library and Information Systems, 45: 365-375. https://doi.org/10.1108/00330331111182085
  18. Maness, J. M. 2006. "Library 2.0 Theory: Web 2.0 and Its Implications for Libraries." Webology, 3. Articles 25. [cited 2012.6.21]. .
  19. Moser, F. 2011. "Evaluating IT Fashion Investments Regarding Risk and Return." AMCIS 2011 Proceedings - All Submissions, Paper 207. [cited 2012.6.21]. .
  20. Neilson, C. 2008. "Current Awareness on a Shoe String: RSS at the HQC." Internet Reference Services Quarterly, 13: 57-67. https://doi.org/10.1300/J136v13n01_03
  21. O'Reilly, T. 2005. "What Is Web 2.0?" [cited 2012.6.21]. .
  22. Rogers, E. M. 1995. Diffusion of Innovations. New York: The Free Press.
  23. Sebastian, M. 2011. Pew Report: Popularity of Blogs Plummets among Young. [cited 2012.6.21]. .
  24. Thornton, E. 2009. "iTunes University and ARL Academic Libraries." Journal of Web Librarianship, 3: 263-272. https://doi.org/10.1080/19322900903113324
  25. Torres-Salinas, D., A. Cabezas-Clavijo, R. Ruiz-Perez, and E. D. Lopez-Cozar. "State of the Library and Information Science Blogosphere after Social Networks Boom: A Metric Approach." Library and Information Science Research, 33: 168-174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2010.08.001
  26. Tripathi, M. and S. Kumar. 2010. "Use of Web 2.0 Tools in Academic Libraries: A Reconnaissance of the International Landscape." The International Library Review, 42: 195-207. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572317.2010.10762864
  27. Wang, P. 2010. "Chasing the Hottest IT: Effects of Information Technology Fashion on Organizations." MIS Quarterly, 34: 63-85.
  28. White, M. D. 2001. "Diffusion of an Innovation: Digital Reference Service in Carnegie Foundation Master's (Comprehensive) Academic Institution Libraries." Journal of Academic Librarianship, 27: 173-187. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-1333(01)00179-3
  29. Yakel, E. and J. Kim. 2005. "Adoption and Diffusion of Encoded Archival Description." Journal of the American Society of Information Science and Technology, 56: 1427-1437. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20236
  30. Yoose, B. 2011. "Wiki Adoption and Use in Academic Library Technical Services: An Exploratory Study." Technical Services Quarterly, 28: 132-159. https://doi.org/10.1080/07317131.2011.546238

Cited by

  1. 이용자관점에서의 도서관 2.0 서비스 활용현황과 활성화 방안 - 폭소노미 서비스를 중심으로 - vol.24, pp.2, 2013, https://doi.org/10.14699/kbiblia.2013.24.2.269