DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

In-vitro study on the accuracy of a simple-design CT-guided stent for dental implants

  • Huh, Young-June (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology and Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Choi, Bo-Ram (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology and Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Huh, Kyung-Hoe (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology and Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Yi, Won-Jin (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Dental Research Institute and BK21 Craniomaxillofacial Life Science, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Heo, Min-Suk (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology and Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Lee, Sam-Sun (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Dental Research Institute and BK21 Craniomaxillofacial Life Science, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Choi, Soon-Chul (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology and Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University)
  • Received : 2012.03.20
  • Accepted : 2012.06.16
  • Published : 2012.09.30

Abstract

Purpose: An individual surgical stent fabricated from computed tomography (CT) data, called a CT-guided stent, would be useful for accurate installation of implants. The purpose of the present study was to introduce a newly developed CT-guided stent with a simple design and evaluate the accuracy of the stent placement. Materials and Methods: A resin template was fabricated from a hog mandible and a specially designed plastic plate, with 4 metal balls inserted in it for radiographic recognition, was attached to the occlusal surface of the template. With the surgical stent applied, CT images were taken, and virtual implants were placed using software. The spatial positions of the virtually positioned implants were acquired and implant guiding holes were drilled into the surgical stent using a specially designed 5-axis drilling machine. The surgical stent was placed on the mandible and CT images were taken again. The discrepancy between the central axis of the drilled holes on the second CT images and the virtually installed implants on the first CT images was evaluated. Results: The deviation of the entry point and angulation of the central axis in the reference plane were $0.47{\pm}0.27$ mm, $0.57{\pm}0.23$ mm, and $0.64{\pm}0.16^{\circ}$, $0.57{\pm}0.15^{\circ}$, respectively. However, for the two different angulations in each group, the $20^{\circ}$ angulation showed a greater error in the deviation of the entry point than did the $10^{\circ}$ angulation. Conclusion: The CT-guided template proposed in this study was highly accurate. It could replace existing implant guide systems to reduce costs and effort.

Keywords

References

  1. Branemark PI, Adell R, Breine U, Hansson BO, Lindstrom J, Ohlsson A. Intra-osseous anchorage of dental prostheses. I. Experimental studies. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 1969; 3 : 81-100. https://doi.org/10.3109/02844316909036699
  2. Israelson H, Plemons JM, Watkins P, Sory C. Barium-coated surgical stents and computer-assisted tomography in the preoperative assessment of dental implant patients. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1992; 12 : 52-61.
  3. Espinosa Marino J, Alvarez Arenal A, Pardo Ceballos A, Fernandez Vazquez JP, Ibaseta Diaz G. Fabrication of an implant radiologic-surgical stent for the partially edentulous patient. Quintessence Int 1995; 26 : 111-4.
  4. Basten CH. The use of radiopaque templates for predictable implant placement. Quintessence Int 1995; 26 : 609-12.
  5. Borrow JW, Smith JP. Stent marker materials for computerized tomograph-assisted implant planning. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1996; 16 : 60-7.
  6. Basten CH, Kois JC. The use of barium sulfate for implant templates. J Prosthet Dent 1996; 76 : 451-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(96)90554-5
  7. Weinberg LA, Kruger B. Three-dimensional guidance system for implant insertion: Part I. Implant Dent 1998; 7 : 81-93. https://doi.org/10.1097/00008505-199807020-00002
  8. Weinberg LA, Kruger B. Three-dimensional guidance system for implant insertion: Part II. Dual axes table-problem solving. Implant Dent 1999; 8 : 255-64. https://doi.org/10.1097/00008505-199903000-00007
  9. Becker CM, Kaiser DA. Surgical guide for dental implant placement. J Prosthet Dent 2000; 83 : 248-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(00)80018-9
  10. Cucchiara R, Franchini F, Lamma A, Lamma E, Sansoni T, Sarti E. Enhancing implant surgery planning via computerized image processing. Int J Comput Dent 2001; 4 : 9-24.
  11. Cucchiara R, Lamma E, Sansoni T. An image analysis approach for automatically re-orienteering CT images for dental implants. Comput Med Imaging Graph 2004; 28 : 185-201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compmedimag.2003.12.004
  12. Owings JR Jr. Virtual imaging guiding implant surgery. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2003; 24 : 333-44.
  13. Marchack CB. An immediately loaded CAD/CAM-guided definitive prosthesis: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent 2005; 93 : 8-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.10.012
  14. Mupparapu M, Singer SR. Implant imaging for the dentist. J Can Dent Assoc 2004; 70 : 32.
  15. Tardieu PB, Vrielinck L, Escolano E. Computer-assisted implant placement. A case report: treatment of the mandible. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003; 18 : 599-604.
  16. Widmann G, Zangerl A, Keiler M, Stoffner R, Bale R, Puelacher W. Flapless implant surgery in the edentulous jaw based on three fixed intoral reference points and image-guided surgical templates: accuracy in human cadavers. Clin Oral Implants Res 2010; 21 : 835-41.
  17. Widmann G, Keiler M, Zangerl A, Stoffner R. Longato S, Bale R, et al. Computer-assisted surgery in the edentulous jaw based on 3 fixed intraoral reference points. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2010; 68 : 1140-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2009.10.008
  18. Pongrácz F, Bárdosi Z, Szabó L. Dentition planning for imageguided implantology. Int Congr Ser 2004; 1268 : 1168-73.
  19. Koulechov K, Lueth T. A new metric for drill location for navigated control in navigated dental implantology. Int Congr Ser 2004; 1268 : 1220-5.
  20. Parel SM, Triplett RG. Interactive imaging for implant planning, placement, and prosthesis construction. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2004; 62(9 suppl 2) : 41-7.
  21. Besimo CE, Lambrecht JT, Guindy JS. Accuracy of implant treatment planning utilizing template-guided reformatted computed tomography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2000; 29 : 46-51. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.dmfr.4600491
  22. Fortin T, Champleboux G, Lormee J, Coudert JL. Precise dental implant placement in bone using surgical guides in conjunction with medical imaging techniques. J Oral Implantol 2000; 26 : 300-3. https://doi.org/10.1563/1548-1336(2000)026<0300:PDIPIB>2.3.CO;2
  23. Widmann G, Widmann R, Widmann E, Jaschke W, Bale RJ. In vitro accuracy of a novel registration and targeting technique for image-guided template production. Clin Oral Implants Res 2005; 16 : 502-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01131.x
  24. Brief J, Edinger D, Hassfeld S, Eggers G. Accuracy of imageguided implantology. Clin Oral Implants Res 2005; 16 : 495-501. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01133.x
  25. Wanschitz F, Birkfellner W, Watzinger F, Schopper C, Patruta S, Kainberger F, et al. Evaluation of accuracy of computeraided intraoperative positioning of endosseous oral implants in the edentulous mandible. Clin Oral Implants Res 2002; 13 : 59-64. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2002.130107.x
  26. Van Steenberghe D, Malevez C, Van Cleynenbreugel J, Bou Serhal C, Dhoore E, Schutyser F, et al. Accuracy of drilling guides for transfer from three-dimensional CT-based planning to placement of zygoma implants in human cadavers. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003; 14 : 131-6. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2003.140118.x