DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Identification of Pick up Sound for Laser printers Based on Psychoacoustic Parameters

심리음향의 음질요소를 이용한 레이저 프린터 급지 이음 평가 및 부품 조합 최적화

  • 이영준 (인하대학교 대학원 기계공학과) ;
  • 신태진 (인하대학교 대학원 기계공학과) ;
  • 유진 (삼성전자 제조기술센터) ;
  • 이상권 (인하대학교 대학원 기계공학과)
  • Received : 2012.06.12
  • Accepted : 2012.08.29
  • Published : 2012.09.20

Abstract

This paper identifies a cause of pick up noise in a laser printer and a relationship between pick up noise and major components related to pick up noise. A pick up sound is affected by many components such as spring force, spring constant, and friction coefficient. Objective evaluation for the pick up sound is difficult because of back ground sound such as operating sound. Especially, a sound between a friction pad and a paper in the process of printing has become an essential issue in an aspect of quality evaluation. However the existing criteria for determining the above sound have solely relied on human's subjective judgments; which highlights the requirement to objectify these criteria. In this paper, the standard of existing pick up noise is established by finding the tonality, which is a psychoacoustic parameter, of noticeable limit sound level. Based on the findings of the method, the study has found factors which cause pick up noise and suggests the substitution of following components of printers such as spring constants, spring force, and the quality of friction pads. As a result, it is confirmed that the proposed pick up noise index has usefulness to classify whether existence of pick up noise with an objective evaluation and not to occur the noise based on design optimized combination of laser printer components.

Keywords

References

  1. Takanashi, A., 2008 Study of Problems with Noise and Sound Quality Evaluations of Copying Machines, Printers, and MFD, SQS 2008.
  2. Popp, K. and Stelter, P., 1990, Stick-slip Vibration and Chaos, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A, Vol. 332, No. 1964, pp. 89-105. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.1990.0102
  3. ISO 11201:1995, Acoustics - Noise Emitted by Machinery and Equipment - Measurement of Emission Sound Pressure Levels at a Work Station and at Other Specified Positions - Engineering Method in an Essentially Free Field Over a Reflecting Plane.
  4. You, J. and Jeon, J. Y., 2008, Just Noticeable Difference of Sound Quality Metrics of Refrigerator Noise, Noise Control Engineering Journal, Vol. 56, No. 6, pp. 414-424. https://doi.org/10.3397/1.2987734
  5. Semal, C. and Demany, L., 2006, Individual Differences in Sensitivity to Pitch Direction, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Vol. 120, No. 6, pp. 3907-3915. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2357708
  6. Bernstein, J. G. W. and Oxenham A. J., 2006, The Relationship Between Frequency Selectivity and Pitch Discrimination: Effects of Stimulus Level, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Vol. 120, No. 6, pp. 3916-3928. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2372451
  7. Eddins, D. A. and Bero, E. M., 2007, Spectral Modulation Detection as a Function of Modulation Frequency, Carrier Bandwidth, and Carrier Frequency Region, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Vol. 121, No. 1, pp. 363-372. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2382347
  8. Gockel, H. E., Moore B. C. J., Carlyon R. P. and Plack, C. J., 2007, Effect of Duration on the Frequency Discrimination of Individual Partials in a Complex Tone and on the Discrimination of Fucdamental Frequency, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Vol. 121, No. 1, pp. 373-382. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2382476
  9. Gelfand, S. A., 1998, Hearing: An Introduction to Psychological and Physiological Acoustics, Marcel Dekker. Inc, New York.
  10. Levitt, H., 1971, Transformed Up-down Methods in Psychoacoustics, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Vol. 49, No. 2, pp. 467-477. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1912375