DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analysis of the Risk Perception of Nuclear Power Plant and Radiation

원자력발전 및 방사선의 사회적 위험에 대한 인식분석

  • Kim, Jung-Hoon (Dept. of Radiological Science, Catholic University of Pusan) ;
  • Kim, Chang-Soo (Dept. of Radiological Science, Catholic University of Pusan) ;
  • Lim, Chang-Seon (Department of Radiological Science, Konyang University)
  • 김정훈 (부산가톨릭대학교 방사선학과) ;
  • 김창수 (부산가톨릭대학교 방사선학과) ;
  • 임창선 (건양대학교 방사선학과)
  • Received : 2012.05.29
  • Accepted : 2012.08.09
  • Published : 2012.08.31

Abstract

Researches on the danger of nuclear power generation, the foundation of the development of national industry and one of the energy sources, as perceived by ordinary citizens, are very important to social acceptance of nuclear power generation. Accordingly, this study intends to understand how ordinary citizens perceive the social risk of nuclear power generation and radiation, and their misconceptions, and to propose ways to improve such perceptions. To achieve these goals, this study analyzed the perceptions of 251 ordinary citizens. The analysis showed that ordinary citizens have vague anxiety and suspicion about the safety of nuclear power generation, and little trust in government-affiliated organizations. The younger they were, the more influential they thought corporations and industries were. The result of this study suggests that the misconceptions of ordinary citizens should be corrected by professors and scientists in university research institutions they trust the most, and their intrinsic perceptions should be changed accordingly.

국가산업발전의 근간이 되며, 에너지 공급원의 하나인 원자력발전에 따른 일반인들의 위험도에 대한 연구는 원자력발전의 사회적 수용성 측면에서 매우 중요한 요소이다. 이에 본 연구는 일반인들이 인식하는 원자력발전과 방사선에 대한 사회적 위험 정도, 오개념 등을 파악하고, 인식 개선을 위해 요구되는 노력을 제시하기 위한 목적을 갖는다. 목적 달성을 위해 일반인 251명을 대상으로 인식을 분석하였다. 분석 결과, 일반인들은 원자력발전의 안전성에 대해 막연한 불안과 의혹을 가지고 있으며, 정부산하단체에 대한 신뢰가 낮은 것으로 나타났다. 연령이 낮을수록 원자력관련 정책결정에 기업이나 산업체의 영향력이 높은 것으로 인식하였다. 본 연구결과를 토대로 할 때, 일반인들이 가장 신뢰하는 대학 연구기관의 교수 및 과학자 집단을 통해 일반인들이 가지고 있는 오개념을 바로 잡고 내재적 인식변화를 모색해야 할 것이다.

Keywords

References

  1. G. S. Kim, "Research of Dilemma Formation and Resolution Process of LULU Facilities Construction Policies: Focused on the Nuclear Power Plats Construction Policies", Journal of Governmental Studies, Vol 14, No.4, pp. 83-121, 2008.
  2. J. S. Shim, Trust in Nuclear Power Plant, Perceived Risk and Benefit, and Acceptance, Korean Policy Studies Review, Vol.18, No.4, pp. 93-122, 2009
  3. Korea Institute of Nuclear Safety,, White Paper on Nuclear Safety, 2010
  4. T. J. Kim, J. E. Lee and Y. S. Jung, " A Study on the Social Risk Comparison for Various Power Systems, The Korea Spatial Planning Review No. 55, pp. 41-58, 2007
  5. Korea Hydro & Nuclear Power Co., Ltd, 1998-2008, Paper on Nuclear Power Plants. 2009.
  6. D. W. Kang, " A Plan for Enhancing the Acceptance of Nuclear Power Through The Application of Meta-Governance Model: Based on the Role of the Government and Media," The Korean Association of Political Science & Communication, Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 191-211, 2008.
  7. K. G. Kim, S. J. Yun, " A Exploratory Study on Acceptability Change of Nuclear Power as a Responding Solution to Climate Change as a Result of Framing Effect and its Policy Implication," Journal of Environmental Policy and Administration, No. 53, pp. 91-129, 2010.
  8. G. H. Lee, "A Study on the Local Media's Role for Improvement of Nuclear Discourse fo Residents at Nuclear Power Plant Sites," Dept. of Communication The Graduate School of Mokwon University, 2010
  9. D. W. Kim, "An Analysis on Changes in Korea Social Acceptance Before and after Visiton Nuclear Energy Facilities, Dept of Energy Policy Graduate School of Energy & Environment Seoul National University of Technology, 2008
  10. B. H. Lee, Y. S. Choi, "Analysis on the Perception of Nuclear Power Plant and the Preference of its Policy Alternatives for Public Acceptance," Journal of the Korean Nuclear Society, Vol. 27, No.1, 1995.
  11. J. E. Lee, Y. P. Kim, Y. S. Jung and T. J. Kim, "Analyzing the Relative Seriousness on Social Risk of Various Power Systems,: Korean Public Administration Reiew, Vol. 41, No. 1, 2007.
  12. C. S. Lim and S. H. Kim, "A Study on the Radiation Dose Managements in the Nuclear Medicine Department", Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society, Vol.10, No.7, pp.1760-1765, July, 2009. https://doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2009.10.7.1760
  13. B. S. Kang and C. S. Lim, "A Study on the Environmental Radiation Dose Measurement in the Nuclear Medicine Department ", Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society, Vol.11, No.6, pp.2118-2123, June, 2010. https://doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2010.11.6.2118
  14. W. R. Borg, M. D. Gall ," Educational study." New York, Longman, 1989.
  15. Hank C. Jenkins-Smith, Jennifer L. Espey, Amelia A. Rouse, Douglas H. Molund(1991), Perception of risk in the management of nuclear wastes: Mapping elite and mass beiefs and attitude, Sandia national laboratories, New Mexico, SAND 90-7002
  16. H. Y. Hee, " The Effect of Risk Perception on the Expectation Level on Risk Communication Process," Dept. Of Communication The Graduate School of Ewha Womans University, 2010.
  17. Y. Y. Lee, N, G, Lee, "Psychological Dimensions of Risk Perception for the Korean," Ewha Womans University, 2005 PMORP WORKSHOP, pp. 1-12, 2005.
  18. Wikimedia, http://ko.wikipedia.org
  19. Y. G. Sin, "Human-Oriented Management, Seoul, dasanbooks, 2007
  20. S. P. Robbins, "Essentials of Organizational Behavior, 8th Edition, Perarson Education, New Jersey : Prentice Hall Inc. 2005
  21. H. J. Kim, "A Study of Primary School Students and Parents Recognition of Nuclear Energy Development," Graduate School of Education Inchon Education University, 2002.
  22. H. Y. Hee, "The Effect of Risk Perception on the Expectation Level on Risk Communication Process," Graduate School of Ewha Womans University, 2009.

Cited by

  1. Structural Relationship for Recognition of Radiation Risks on Management and Benefits of the University Students vol.12, pp.2, 2014, https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2014.12.2.431