Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society (한국산학기술학회논문지)

The Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society (한국산학기술학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Comparison of Kinematic Data of the Body Orientation in Sitting Position to Adapt Dynamically Changing Angle of the Base of Support in Stroke Patients and Healthy Adults

뇌졸중 환자와 정상 성인의 앉은 자세에서 지지면의 동적 각도 변화에 적응하는 신체 정위의 운동형상학적 비교

  • Song, In-Su (Dept. of Physical Therapy, Daejeon Rehabilitation Hospital) ;
  • Choi, Jong-Duk (Dept. of Physical Therapy, College of Natural Science, Daejeon University)
  • 송인수 (대전요양병원 물리치료실) ;
  • 최종덕 (대전대학교 자연과학대학 물리치료학과)
  • Received : 2012.05.11
  • Accepted : 2012.08.09
  • Published : 2012.08.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the difference of the body orientation ability in sitting position to adapt to dynamically changing angle of the base of support in stroke patients and Healthy adults. The angle between vertical and head and trunk in 12 stroke patients (6 male and 6 female) and 12 healthy adults (6 male and 6 female) were measured by video motion analysis system. The head and trunk angle between stroke patients and healthy adults in sitting position were significantly different when increase the angle of dominant side(p<.05). The head and trunk angle between stroke patients and healthy adults in sitting position were significantly different when increase the angle of non-dominant side(p<.05). The head and trunk angle between stroke patients and healthy adults in sitting position were significantly different when decrease the angle of non-dominant side(p<.05). The head angle between stroke patients and healthy adults in sitting position was significantly different(p<.05), but the trunk angle was not significantly different when decrease the angle of dominant side(p>.05), Stroke patients compared to healthy adults had more deficits in their body orientation ability in sitting position to adapt to dynamically changing angle of the base of support. This finding may help to understand postural control deficits more clearly in stroke patients in sitting position.

본 연구는 뇌졸중 환자와 정상 성인이 앉은 자세에서 동적으로 변화하는 지지면의 각도에 적응하여 신체를 정위시키는 능력에 차이가 있는지 알아보기 위해 실시되었다. 뇌졸중 환자 12명(남 6명, 여 6명)과 정상 성인 12명(남 6명, 여 6명)을 대상으로 실시하였고, 앉은 자세에서 지지면을 2가지 방향(우세측, 비우세측)으로 기울였을 때 수직선과 머리와 체간이 이루는 각도를 영상 동작 분석 시스템을 이용하여 측정하였다. 앉은 자세에서 우세한 쪽을 올렸을 때 뇌졸중 환자와 정상 성인의 사이의 머리와 체간의 각도는 유의한 차이를 보였다(p<0.05). 앉은 자세에서 비우세한 쪽을 올렸을 때 뇌졸중 환자와 정상 성인 사이의 머리와 체간의 각도는 유의한 차이를 보였다(p<0.05). 앉은 자세에서 비우세한 쪽을 내렸을 때 뇌졸중 환자와 정상 성인 사이의 머리와 체간의 각도는 유의한 차이를 보였다(p<0.05). 앉은 자세에서 우세한 쪽을 내렸을 때 뇌졸중 환자와 정상 성인 사이의 머리의 각도는 유의한 차이를 보였으나(p<0.05) 체간의 각도는 유의한 차이를 보이지 않았다(p>0.05). 본 연구의 결과, 뇌졸중 환자들이 정상 성인에 비해 동적으로 변화하는 지지면의 각도에 적응하여 신체를 정위시키는 능력에 있어서 다양한 결손이 있음을 확인하였다. 뇌졸중 환자가 앉은 자세에서 환경의 변화에 적응하여 신체를 정위시키는 능력의 분석을 통해 뇌졸중 환자의 앉은 자세 조절의 문제점을 좀 더 명확히 이해할 수 있을 것으로 여겨진다.

Keywords

References

  1. Carr JH, Shepherd RB, Investigation of a new motor assessment scale for stroke patient, Physical therapy, Vol. 65, No. 2, pp. 175-180, 1985. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/65.2.175
  2. Harley C, Boyd JE, Cockburn J, Collin C, Haggard P, Wann JP, et al, Disruption of sitting balance after stroke: influence of spoken output, Journal of neurology, Neurosurgery, and psychiatry, Vol. 77, No. 5, pp. 674-676, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.2005.074138
  3. Eggers O, Occupational therapy in the treatment of adult hemiplegia, Rockville, Aspen System Corp., 1984.
  4. Charness A, Stroke Head injury, Rockville, Aspen System Corp., 1986.
  5. Perlmutter S, Lin F, Makhsous M, Quantitative analysis of static sitting posture in chronic stroke, Gait & Posture, Vol. 32, No. 1, pp. 53-56, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2010.03.005
  6. Campbell FM, Ashbum AM, Pickering RM, Burnett M, Head and pelvic movements during a dynamic reaching task in sitting: Implications for physical therapists, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, Vol. 82, No. 12, pp. 1655-1660, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1053/apmr.2001.26818
  7. Geiger RA, Allen JB, O'Keefe J, Balance and mobility following stroke: Effects of physical therapy intervention with and without biofeedback/forceplate training, Physical therapy, Vol. 81, No. 4, pp. 995-1005, 2001.
  8. Holt RR, Simpson D, Jenner JR, Kirker SG, Wing AM, Ground reaction force after a sideways push as a measure of balance in recovery from stroke, Clinical rehabilitation, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 88-95, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1191/026921500668655351
  9. Bobath B, Adult hemiplegia: Evaluation and treatment, 3rd ed, pp. 1-13, p. 105, Heinemann, 1990.
  10. Williams HG, Fisher JM, et al, Descriptive analysis of static postural control in 4, 6 and 8 year old normal and motorically, American journal of physical medicine, Vol. 62, No. 1, pp. 12-26, 1983.
  11. Brunnstrom S, Brunnstrom's movement therapy in hemiplegia, 2nd ed, p. 11, Lippincott, Philadelphia, 1992.
  12. Carr JH, Shepherd RB, Physiotherapy in disorder of the brain, 2nd ed, p. 233, 267, Heinemann, London, 1983.
  13. Shumway-Cook A, Woollacott M, Attentional demands and postural control: the effect of sensory context, The journals of gerontology, Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences, Vol. 55, No. 1, pp. 10-16, 2000.
  14. Barclay-Goddard R, Stevenson T, Poluha W, Moffatt ME, Taback SP, Force platform feedback for standing balance training after stroke, Stroke, Vol. 36, No. 2, pp. 412-413, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000152342.01701.96
  15. Dean CM, Shepherd RB, Task-related training improves performance of seated reaching tasks after stroke, Stroke, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp. 722-728, 1997. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.28.4.722
  16. Verheyden G, Nieuwboer A, Van de Winckel A, De Weerdt W, Clinical tools to measure trunk performance after stroke:asusystemic review of the erature, Clinical rehabilitation, Vol. 21, No. 5, pp. 387-394, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215507074055
  17. Winzeler-Mercay U, Mudie H, The nature of the effects of the stroke on trunk flexor and extensor muscles during work and at rest, Disability and rehabilitation, Vol. 24, No. 17, pp. 875-886, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638280210142220
  18. Kwakkel G, Wagenaar RC, Kollen BJ, Lankhorst GJ, Predicting disability in stroke: a clinical review of the literature, Age Ageing, Vol. 25, No. 6, pp. 479-489, 1996. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/25.6.479
  19. Verheyden G, Nieuwboer A, Mertin J, Preger R, Kiekens C, De Weerdt W, The trunk Impairment Scale: a new tools to measure motor impairment of the trunk after stroke, Clinical rehabilitation, Vol. 18, No. 3, pp. 326-334, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1191/0269215504cr733oa
  20. Morishita M, Amimoto K, Matsuda T, Analysis of dynamic sitting balance on the independence of gait in hemiparetic patients, Gait & Posture, Vol. 29, No. 5, pp. 530-534, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2008.12.005
  21. Wade DT, Hewer RL, Functional abilities after stroke: measurement, natural history and prognosis. Journal of neurology, Neurosurgery, and psychiatry, Vol. 50,No. 2, pp. 177-182, 1987. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.50.2.177
  22. Mulcahy CM, Pountney TE, Nelham RI, Green EM, Billington GD, Adaptive seating for the motor handicapped problems, a solution, assessment and prescription, Physiotherapy, Vol. 74, pp. 531-536, 1988. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-9406(10)63403-7
  23. Sandin KJ, Smith BS, The measure of balance in sitting in stroke rehabilitation prognosis, Stroke, Vol. 21, No. 1, pp. 82-86, 1990. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.21.1.82
  24. Feigin L, Sharon B, Czaczkes B, Rosin AJ, Sitting equilibrium 2 weeks after a stroke can predict the walking ability after 6 months, Gerontology, Vol. 42, No. 6, pp. 348-353, 1996. https://doi.org/10.1159/000213814
  25. Wade DT, Skilbeck CE, Hewer RL, Predicting Barthel ADL score at 6 months after an acute stroke, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, Vol. 64, No. 1, pp. 24-28, 1983.
  26. Luyat M, Ohlmann T, Barraud PA, Subjective vertical and postural activity. Acta psychologica, Vol. 95, No. 2, pp. 181-193, 1997. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-6918(96)00015-7
  27. Perennou DA, Amblard B, Laassel el M, Benaim C, Herisson C, Pelissier J, Understanding the pusher behavior of some stroke patients with spatial deficits: a pilot study, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, Vol. 83, No. 4, pp. 570-575, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1053/apmr.2002.31198
  28. Genthon N, Vuillerme N, Monnet J, Petit C, Rougier P, Biomechanical assessment of the sitting posture maintenance in patients with stroke, Clinical biomechanics, Vol. 22, No. 9, pp. 1024-1029, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2007.07.011
  29. van Nes IJ, Nienhuis B, Latour H, Geurts AC, Posturographic assessment of sitting balance recovery in the subacute phase of stroke, Gait & Posture, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp. 507-512, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2008.03.004