Pharmacokinetics and Excretion into Expired Air of Urea, a Potential Diagnosis Reagent of Helicobacter pylori Infection

헬리코박터 파이로리 균의 진단시약 개발을 위한 요소의 체내동태 및 호기 중 배설

  • Park, Seung-Hyeok (College of Pharmacy, Chungbuk National University) ;
  • Shin, Dae-Hwan (College of Pharmacy, Chungbuk National University) ;
  • Cho, Han-Jun (College of Pharmacy, Chungbuk National University) ;
  • Yim, Ju-Bin (College of Pharmacy, Chungbuk National University) ;
  • Lim, Sung-Cil (College of Pharmacy, Chungbuk National University) ;
  • Han, Kun (College of Pharmacy, Chungbuk National University) ;
  • Chung, Youn-Bok (College of Pharmacy, Chungbuk National University)
  • Received : 2012.04.06
  • Accepted : 2012.06.18
  • Published : 2012.06.30

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of the present study was to investigate the pharmacokinetics of urea, a new potential diagnosis reagent of Helicobacter pylori infection. Methods: Considering the mechanism of urea breath test, we determined the excretion of urea in expired air after its oral administration in rats and beagle dogs at the dose of 2 mg/kg (including 50 mCi/mmol $^{14}C$-urea 50 ${\mu}Ci/kg$ for rats and 13.5 ${\mu}Ci/kg$ for dogs). Results: Urea was rapidly disappeared from the blood circulation by 1 hr after its i.v. bolus injection, followed by a slow disappearance by 24 hr. The half-lives at the distributive phase ($t_{1/2{\alpha}}$) and post-distributive phase ($t_{1/2{\beta}}$) were 2 min and 6 hr, respectively. The bioavailability of urea was 64.3% after its oral administration. The values of the volume of distribution ($V_{dss}$) and the total body clearance ($CL_t$) after the oral administration were compatible with those after i.v. administration. The recovery of urea in the bile was about 0.1% of the dose by 24 hr after its oral administration. Urea was extensively eliminated in the urine by 48 hr. The recovery ratios of urea in the urine and expired air were about 86.8% and 2.99% of the dose by 48 hr, respectively. Moreover, urea was mostly distributed from the blood circulation to the kidney, followed by being eliminated in the urine without metabolism. The concentration of urea in the kidney was 4.0 times higher than that of plasma at 40 min after its oral administration. Conclusions: These findings indicated that oral route appears to be available for the administration of urea. Orally administered urea, thus, was considered to be useful for the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection.

Keywords

References

  1. Westblom TU, Bhatt BD, Dignosis of Helicobacter pylori infection. Cur Topics in Microbiol &Immunol 1999; 241: 215-35.
  2. Kopanski Z, Schlegel-Zawadzka M, Witkowska B, et al., Role of enterotest in the diagnosis of the Helicobacter pylori infections. Eur J Med Res 1996; 1(11): 520-2.
  3. Wilcox MH, Dent TH, Hunter JO, et al., Accuracy of serology for the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection. J Clin Pathol 1996; 49: 373-6. https://doi.org/10.1136/jcp.49.5.373
  4. Cohen H, Rose S, Lewin DN, et al., Accuracy of four commercially available serologic tests, including two office-based tests, for diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori. Helicobacter 1999; 4: 49-53. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-5378.1999.09025.x
  5. Puspok A, Bakos S, Oberhuber G. A new, non-invasive method for detection of Helicobacter pylori: validity in the routine clinical setting. Eur J Gastroenterol & Hepatol 1999; 11: 1139-42. https://doi.org/10.1097/00042737-199910000-00011
  6. Klein PD, Malaty HM, Martin RF, et al., Non-invasive detection of Helicobacter pylori infection in clinical practice: the 13C urea breath test. American J Gastroenterol 1996; 91: 690-4.
  7. Ludes M, Antoine de M, Anne MS, et al., Diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection: Non-invasive methods compared to invasive methods and evaluation of two new tests. American J Gastroenterol 2001; 2: 96-6.
  8. Nishikawa K, Sugiyama T, Kato M, et al., A prospective evaluation of new rapid urease tests before and after eradication treatment of Helicobacter pylori, in comparison with histology, culture and 13C-urea breath test. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2000; 51: 164-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-5107(00)70412-3
  9. Chiu WY, Chick WK, Kwok KH. A home made rapid urease test in the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection. Singapore Med J 1999; 40: 243-5.
  10. Tsuchiyama T, Shimazaki T, Takemori Y, et al., Evaluation of modified rapid urease test in diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori. Nippon Shokakibyo Gakkai Zasshi 1997; 94: 718.
  11. Ng FH, Wong SY, Ng WF. Storage temperature of the unbuffered rapid urease test. American J Gastroenterol 1997; 92: 2230-1.
  12. Millar AM, Hannan J. 13C-urea versus 14C-urea breath test: is there still a need for 14C-urea. Nuclear Med Communications 1999; 20: 686-6. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006231-199907000-00043
  13. Mock T, Yatscoff R, Foster R, et al., Clinical validation of the Helikit: a 13C urea breath test used for the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection. Clin Biochem 1999; 32: 59-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-9120(98)00082-4
  14. Goto A, Fujimori K, kaneko T, et al., Diagnosis of elicobacter infection by serodiagnosis, analysis of serum pepsinogen, and urea breath tests. Nippon Naika Gakkai Zasshi-Journal of Japanese Society of internal Medicine 1998; 87(5): 863-7. https://doi.org/10.2169/naika.87.863
  15. Labenz J, Barsch G, Peits U, et al., Validity of a novel biopsy urease test(HUT) and a simplified 13C-urea breath test for diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection and estimation of the severity of gastritis. Digestion 1996; 57: 391-7. https://doi.org/10.1159/000201366