The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics

The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics (대한치과보철학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Efficacy of various cleansing techniques on dentin wettability and its influence on shear bond strength of a resin luting agent

  • Received : 2011.12.02
  • Accepted : 2012.06.11
  • Published : 2012.08.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

PURPOSE. To evaluate the shear bond strength of resin luting agent to dentin surfaces cleansed with different agents like pumice, ultrasonic scaler with chlorhexidine gluconate, EDTA and the influence of these cleansing methods on wetting properties of the dentin by Axisymmetric drop Shape Analysis - Contact Diameter technique (ADSA-CD). MATERIALS AND METHODS. Forty coronal portions of human third molar were prepared until dentin was exposed. Specimens were divided into two groups: Group A and Group B. Provisional restorations made with autopolymerizing resin were luted to dentin surface with zinc oxide eugenol in Group A and with freegenol cement in Group B. All specimens were stored in distilled water at room temperature for 24 hrs and provisional cements were mechanically removed with explorer and rinsed with water and cleansed using various methods (Control-air-water spray, Pumice prophylaxis, Ultrasonic scaler with 0.2% Chlorhexidine gluconate, 17% EDTA). Contact angle measurements were performed to assess wettability of various cleansing agents using the ADSA-CD technique. Bond strength of a resin luting agent bonded to the cleansed surface was assessed using Instron testing machine and the mode of failure noted. SEM was done to assess the surface cleanliness. Data were statistically analyzed by one-way analysis of variance with Tukey HSD tests (${\alpha}$=.05). RESULTS. Specimens treated with EDTA showed the highest shear bond strength and the lowest contact angle for both groups. SEM showed that EDTA was the most effective solution to remove the smear layer. Also, mode of failure seen was predominantly cohesive for both EDTA and pumice prophylaxis. CONCLUSION. EDTA was the most effective dentin cleansing agent among the compared groups.

Keywords

References

  1. Ayad MF, Rosenstiel SF, Hassan MM. Surface roughness of dentin after tooth preparation with different rotary instrumentation. J Prosthet Dent 1996;75:122-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(96)90087-6
  2. Terata R. Characterization of enamel and dentin surfaces after removal of temporary cement-study on removal of temporary cement. Dent Mater J 1993;12:18-28. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.12.18
  3. Grasso CA, Caluori DM, Goldstein GR, Hittelman E. In vivo evaluation of three cleansing techniques for prepared abutment teeth. J Prosthet Dent 2002;88:437-41. https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2002.128123
  4. Hulsmann M, Heckendorff M, Lennon A. Chelating agents in root canal treatment: mode of action and indications for their use. Int Endod J 2003;36:810-30. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2003.00754.x
  5. Rosales-Leal JI, Osorio R, Toledano M, Cabrerizo-Vilchez MA, Millstein PL. Influence of eugenol contamination on the wetting of ground and etched dentin. Oper Dent 2003;28:695-9.
  6. Sarac D, Sarac YS, Kulunk S, Kulunk T. Effect of the dentin cleansing techniques on dentin wetting and on the bond strength of a resin luting agent. J Prosthet Dent 2005;94:363-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.07.009
  7. Hansen EK, Asmussen E. Influence of temporary filling materials on effect of dentin bonding agents. Scand J Dent Res 1987;95:516-20.
  8. Meyerowitz JM, Rosen M, Cohen J, Becker PJ. The effect of eugenol containing and non-eugenol temporary cements on the resin-enamel bond. J Dent Assoc S Afr 1994;49:389-92.
  9. Ngoh EC, Pashley DH, Loushine RJ, Weller RN, Kimbrough WF. Effects of eugenol on resin bond strengths to root canal dentin. J Endod 2001;27:411-4. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200106000-00011
  10. Yap AU, Shah KC, Loh ET, Sim SS, Tan CC. Influence of eugenol-containing temporary restorations on bond strength of composite to dentin. Oper Dent 2001;26:556-61.
  11. Kielbassa AM, Attin T, Hellwig E. Diffusion behavior of eugenol from zinc oxide-eugenol mixtures through human and bovine dentin in vitro. Oper Dent 1997;22:15-20.
  12. Duke ES, Phillips RW, Blumershine R. Effects of various agents in cleaning cut dentine. J Oral Rehabil 1985;12:295-302. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.1985.tb01284.x
  13. Takeda FH, Harashima T, Kimura Y, Matsumoto K. A comparative study of the removal of smear layer by three endodontic irrigants and two types of laser. Int Endod J 1999;32:32-9. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.1999.00182.x
  14. Peters O, Gohring TN, Lutz F. Effect of eugenol-containing sealer on marginal adaptation of dentine-bonded resin fillings. Int Endod J 2000;33:53-9. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.2000.00271.x
  15. Abbott PV, Heijkoop PS, Cardaci SC, Hume WR, Heithersay GS. An SEM study of the effects of different irrigation sequences and ultrasonics. Int Endod J 1991;24:308-16. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.1991.tb00141.x
  16. Brannstrom M, Nordenvall KJ, Glantz PO. The effect of EDTAcontaining surface-active solutions on the morphology of prepared dentin: an in vivo study. J Dent Res 1980;59:1127-31. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345800590070501
  17. Cameron JA. Factors affecting the clinical efficiency of ultrasonic endodontics: a scanning electron microscopy study. Int Endod J 1995;28:47-53. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.1995.tb00156.x
  18. Braga RR, Ballester RY, Carrilho MR. Pilot study on the early shear strength of porcelain-dentin bonding using dual-cure cements. J Prosthet Dent 1999;81:285-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(99)70270-2
  19. Lafuente JD, Chaves A, Carmiol R. Bond strength of dual-cured resin cements to human teeth. J Esthet Dent 2000;12:105-10. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.2000.tb00207.x
  20. Bayindir F, Akyil MS, Bayindir YZ. Effect of eugenol and noneugenol containing temporary cement on permanent cement retention and microhardness of cured composite resin. Dent Mater J 2003;22:592-9. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.22.592
  21. Van Meerbeek B, Inokoshi S, Braem M, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Morphological aspects of the resin-dentin interdiffusion zone with different dentin adhesive systems. J Dent Res 1992;71:1530-40. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345920710081301

Cited by

  1. Microshear bond strength according to dentin cleansing methods before recementation vol.6, pp.2, 2014, https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2014.6.2.79
  2. Wettability of dentin after Yb:KYW thin-disk femtosecond ablation vol.30, pp.6, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-014-1655-8
  3. Effects of Yb:KYW thin-disk femtosecond laser ablation on enamel surface roughness vol.59, pp.None, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlastec.2013.12.004
  4. Positive influence of simvastatin used as adjuvant agent for cavity lining vol.23, pp.9, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-018-2757-7
  5. Effect of temporary cement removal methods from human dentin on zirconia-dentin adhesion vol.33, pp.19, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1080/01694243.2019.1630163
  6. Caries removal with Er:YAG laser followed by dentin biomodification with carbodiimide and chitosan: Wettability and surface morphology analysis vol.83, pp.2, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1002/jemt.23395
  7. Status of decontamination methods after using dentin adhesion inhibitors on indirect restorations: An integrative review of 19 publications vol.57, pp.None, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdsr.2021.08.001