DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Evaluation of the course of the inferior alveolar canal in the mandibular ramus using cone beam computed tomography

  • Kwon, Kyung-Hwan (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Wonkwang University, Wonkwang Dental Research Institute) ;
  • Sim, Kyu-Bong (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Wonkwang University, Wonkwang Dental Research Institute) ;
  • Lee, Jae-Min (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Wonkwang University, Wonkwang Dental Research Institute)
  • 투고 : 2012.05.12
  • 심사 : 2012.08.02
  • 발행 : 2012.08.30

초록

Objectives: This study sought to provide guidelines in order to decrease the incidence of nerve injury during mandibular ramus bone harvesting, and to improve understanding of the anatomical structure of the inferior alveolar canal (IAC) to include its distance from the exterior buccal cortex. Materials and Methods: In January and February 2009, 20 patients who visited the Wonkwang University Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery reporting various conditions underwent cone beam computed tomography and were included in this study. Patients with missing left or right mandibular first molars or incisors, or who had jaw fracture or bone pathologies, were excluded. The reference point (R point) was defined as the point where the occlusal plane reached the anterior ramus of the mandible. The position of the IAC in relation to the R point, the buccal bone width (BW), the alveolar crest distance (ACD), the distance from the alveolar crest to the occlusal plane (COD), and the distance from the IAC to the sagittal plane (CS) were determined using proprietary image analysis software which produced cross-sectional coronal and axial images. Results: The distance medially from the R point to the IAC along the axial plane was $6.19{\pm}1.21mm$. The HD from the R point, posteriorly to IAC, in the lateral view was $13.07{\pm}2.45mm$, the VD from the R point was $14.24{\pm}2.41mm$, and the ND from the R point was $10.12{\pm}1.76mm$. The pathway of the IAC was positioned almost in a straight line along a sagittal plane within $0.56{\pm}0.70mm$. The distance from the buccal bone surface to the IAC increased anteriorly from the R point. Conclusion: Marking osteotomy lines in the retromolar area in procedures involving bone harvesting should be discouraged due to the risk of damage to IAC structures. Our measurements indicated that the area from the R point in the ramus of the mandible to 10 mm anterior can be safely harvested for bone grafting purposes.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Triplett RG, Schow SR. Autologous bone grafts and endosseous implants: complementary techniques. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1996;54:486-94.
  2. Jensen J, Sindet-Pedersen S, Oliver AJ. Varying treatment strategies for reconstruction of maxillary atrophy with implants: results in 98 patients. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1994;52:210-6.
  3. Habets LL, Bras J, Borgmeyer-Hoelen AM. Mandibular atrophy and metabolic bone loss. Endocrinology, radiology and histomorphometry. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1988;17:208-11.
  4. Misch CE, Dietsh F. Bone-grafting materials in implant dentistry. Implant Dent 1993;2:158-67.
  5. Silva FM, Cortez AL, Moreira RW, Mazzonetto R. Complications of intraoral donor site for bone grafting prior to implant placement. Implant Dent 2006;15:420-6.
  6. Gowgiel JM. The position and course of the mandibular canal. J Oral Implantol 1992;18:383-5.
  7. Li N, Zhao B, Tan C. Intramandibular course and anatomic structure of the inferior alveolar nerve canal. Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi 2001;36:446-7.
  8. Kamburoglu K, Kilic C, Ozen T, Yuksel SP. Measurements of mandibular canal region obtained by cone-beam computed tomography: a cadaveric study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009;107:e34-42.
  9. Parikh SN. Bone graft substitutes: past, present, future. J Postgrad Med 2002;48:142-8.
  10. von Arx T, Kurt B. Implant placement and simultaneous peri-implant bone grafting using a micro titanium mesh for graft stabilization. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1998;18:117-27.
  11. Yamamoto R, Nakamura A, Ohno K, Michi KI. Relationship of the mandibular canal to the lateral cortex of the mandibular ramus as a factor in the development of neurosensory disturbance after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2002;60:490-5.
  12. Reich RH. Anatomical studies on the course of the mandibular canal. Dtsch Zahnarztl Z 1980;35:972-5.
  13. Levine MH, Goddard AL, Dodson TB. Inferior alveolar nerve canal position: a clinical and radiographic study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007;65:470-4.
  14. Ha SY, Song NK, Koh KJ. A computerized tomographic study on the location of the mandibular canal and the cortical thickness of the mandible. J Korean Acad Oral Maxillofac Radiol 1997;27:217-30.
  15. Misch CM. Comparison of intraoral donor sites for onlay grafting prior to implant placement. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1997;12: 767-76.
  16. Nkenke E, Radespiel-Troger M, Wiltfang J, Schultze-Mosgau S, Winkler G, Neukam FW. Morbidity of harvesting of retromolar bone grafts: a prospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2002;13: 514-21.
  17. Smith BR, Rajchel JL, Waite DE, Read L. Mandibular anatomy as it relates to rigid fixation of the sagittal ramus split osteotomy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1991;49:222-6.
  18. Lavelle CL. Preliminary study of mandibular shape after tooth loss. J Prosthet Dent 1985;53:726-30.

피인용 문헌

  1. The horizontal inclination angle is associated with the risk of inferior alveolar nerve injury during the extraction of mandibular third molars vol.46, pp.12, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2017.07.010
  2. Assessment of the configuration of the mandibular canal using cone beam computed tomography vol.69, pp.6, 2012, https://doi.org/10.23736/s0026-4970.20.04374-5