DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Development and Area Adaptation of Flow Charts Related to Gynecologic Oncology Nursing Practices

  • Published : 2012.05.30

Abstract

Aim: This one group semi-experimental study was performed to develop and adapt flow charts of nursing practices applied to gynecologic oncology patients to the field. Methods: The research was conducted between October 2008 and March 2009 in 6 hospitals in Istanbul (3 health ministry hospitals, 2 private hospitals and 1 university hospital) with effective programs. The scope of the study included 97 midwives/nurses who had been working as caregivers of gynecologic oncology patients in this unit at least for 6 months and who participated in this study voluntarily; 87 people composed the sample because of the absence of others on vacation or sick leave when the data were collected or who did not wish to participate. The data were in descriptive information form collected via "Forms to Determine the Efficiency of Flow Charts". Before data collection, risks related to gynecologic oncology problems were identified, a literature scanning was made for existing flow charts based on actual practices and the discovered charts were reviewed. As a result of the evaluations, it was decided to create 15 flow charts intended for risks, symptoms, operation processes and discharge. Questionnaires to determine activity were applied to participants before and after practice. Results: As a result of the study, it was determined that the efficiency of the flow charts increased significantly (p <0.01) after practice of the participants, nosignificant relationships (p>0.01) being apparent with age group, education level, occupational period in the job and in the gynecologic oncology field and evaluations of the practice before and after it was applied. Conclusion: The results of the study revealed that nursing participants in university and private hospitals and who supported the existence of a flow chart in the field evaluated the flow charts positively.

Keywords

References

  1. Ayral N, Tonbul S, Akman MN (2003). Systematic approach in nursing care rehabilitation center of a university hospital. Hacettepe Universitesi Hemsirelik Yüksekokulu Dergisi, 10, 53-9.
  2. Bektas G (1997). What should be done for raising the quality of patient care and safety provision? Turk Hemşireler Dergisi, 17, 31-2.
  3. Biffl WL, Smith WR, Moore EE, Gonzalez RC, Morgan SC (2001). Evolution of a multidisciplinary clinical pathway for the management of unstable patients with pelvic fractures. Ann Surg, 233, 843-50. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-200106000-00015
  4. Darer J, Pronovost P, Bass EB (2002). Use and evaluation of critical pathways in hospitals. Eff Clin Pract, 5, 114-9.
  5. Das Z (1999). Case management and maintenance protocol. Cumhuriyet Universitesi Hemsirelik Yuksekokulu Dergisi, 3, 11-7.
  6. Dy SM, Garg P, Nyberg D, et al (2005). Critical pathway effectiveness: Assessing the impact of patient, hospital care and pathway characteristics using qualitative comparative analysis. Health Serv Res, 40, 499-516. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.0r370.x
  7. Eroglu F, Ozmen S, Noyaner A, Aydın C (2001). Can we improve the quality of health care in ICU patients? Suleyman Demirel Universitesi Tip Fakultesi Dergisi, 8, 9-11.
  8. Ertem G (2003). The examination of the effect of the Standardsbased nursing care on quality of care and patient satisfaction, Ege Universitesi Saglik Bilimleri Enstitusu Kadın Sagligi ve Hastalikları Hemsireligi Anabilim Dalı Doktora Tezi, Izmir (Danisman: U.Sevil).
  9. Gencalp NS, Eryilmaz HY (1998). The evaluation of the nursing care given by 3. Grade nursing students to the hysterectomy patients by using the nursing care protocol. Uluslararasi Katlımli VI. Ulusal Hemsirelik Kongresi Kongre Kitabi, Ankara, s:195-198.
  10. Ghosh K, Downs LS, Padilla LA, et al (2001). The implementation of critical pathways in gynecologic oncology in a managed care setting: A cost analysis. Gynecol Oncol, 83, 378-82. https://doi.org/10.1006/gyno.2001.6428
  11. Gokdogan F (1992). A study in the standardization of nursing care. 3. Ulusal Hemsirelik Kongresi Kitabi, Cumhuriyet Universitesi Hemsirelik Yuksekokulu, Esnaf Ofset Matbaacilik, Sivas, s:35-42.
  12. Gombul, O (1993). Nursing quality assurance and standards. Turk Hemsireler Dergisi, 43, 22-8.
  13. Muller MK, Dedes KJ, Dindo D, et al (2009). Impact of clinical pathways in surgery. Langenbecks Arch Surg, 394, 31-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-008-0352-0
  14. Nural, N (1992). Standard of quality care. III ulusal hemsirelik kongre kitabi.s:23-24, 28-34.
  15. Oskay Sahin A, Oktay S (2001). Patient Acceptance of Development Standards. 1.Uluslararasi& 8. Ulusal Hemsirelik Kongresi Kongre Kitabi, 462-6.
  16. Ring E (2005). Defining, Analyzing and using patient perceptions to develop standards for improving care. Northcentral University Faculty of the Depertment of Business and Management Doctor of Philisophy, Colordo.
  17. San Turgay A (1998). Evaluation of the effect of the standard of nursing care in the prevention of pressure sores. Ege Universitesi Saglik Bilimleri Enstitüsü Hemsirelik Programı Yuksek Lisans Tezi, Izmir (Danisman: E. Cakırcali).
  18. Sen N (2005). The effect of standard nursing care model on the care quality of the total parenteral fed children. Ege Universitesi Hemsirelik Yuksekokulu Dergisi, 21, 59-75.
  19. Senuzun Ergun F (1998). Examination of the effect of the standard model of nursing care developed for patients undergoing percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, on quality of life of the patient and care capability. Ege Universitesi Saglik Bilimleri Enstitusu Ic Hastaliklari Hemsireligi Anabilim Dali Yuksek Lisans Tezi, Izmir, (Danisman: C. Fadıloglu).
  20. Sharghi N, Bosch RJ, Mayer K, Essex M, Seage GR (2005). The development and utility of a clinical algorithm to predict early HIV-1 infection. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr, 4, 472-8.
  21. Tosun N (2002). Implementation of case management model of care of patients with acute myocardial infarction. Gulhane Askeri Tıp Akademisi Saglik Bilimleri Enstitüsü Hemşirelik Programi Doktora Tezi, Ankara, s: 11-19. (Danisman: N. Akbayrak)
  22. Unlu H (1999). Development of standards for taking culture for urine sample. Hemsirelik Arastirma Dergisi, 1, 57-70.
  23. Veyisoglu D, Aydın O, Ersoy K (2000). Implementation of patient care quality improvement tools and methods in the patient admission services. 3. Ulusal Saglik ve Hastane Yonetimi Sempozyumu (Uluslar arasi Katilimli) Bildiriler Kitabi. s:511.
  24. Vries M, Weert JCM, Jansen J, Lemmens VE, Maas HUA (2007). Step by step development of clinical care pathways for older cancer patients: Necessary or desirable? Eur J Cancer, 43, 2170-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2007.08.004
  25. Wong C, Visram F, Cook D, et al (2000). Development, dissemination, implementation and evaluation of a clinical pathway for oxygen therapy. Canadian Med Association J, 162, 29-33.
  26. Yildiz Eryilmaz H (2001). Determination of the effects of the care management (Pathway) applied postpartum. 1.Uluslararasi & 8. Ulusal Hemsirelik Kongresi Kongre Kitabi, 260-266.
  27. Yilmaz M (2001). A measure of health care quality: Patient satisfaction. Cumhuriyet Universiesi Hemsirelik Yuksekokulu Dergisi, 5, 69-73.