대한교통학회지 (Journal of Korean Society of Transportation)

  • 제30권4호
  • /
  • Pages.7-19
  • /
  • 2012
  • /
  • 1229-1366(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2234-4217(eISSN)
대한교통학회 (Korean Society of Transportation)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

조건부가치측정법(CVM)을 이용한 보행환경개선사업에 대한 편익 추정

A Study on Estimating the Benefits by Pedestrian Environment Improvement Using CVM

  • 김장욱 (한국철도공사 연구원 경영연구처) ;
  • 강순양 ((주)대한콘설탄트 교통계획부) ;
  • 김경태 (서울시립대학교 교통공학과) ;
  • 강영균 (현대건설 연구개발본부)
  • Kim, Jang-Wook (Department of Demand Analysis, KORAIL Research Institute) ;
  • Kang, Soon-Yang (Department of transportation planning, Dae Han Consultants Co., Ltd.) ;
  • Kim, Kyung-Tae (Department of Transportation Engineering, University of Seoul) ;
  • Kang, Young-Kyun (Research & Development Division, Hyundai Engineering & Construction Co., Ltd.)
  • 투고 : 2011.01.31
  • 심사 : 2012.07.25
  • 발행 : 2012.08.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구에서는 최근 환경재의 편익을 추정하기 위한 목적으로 환경경제학에서 사용하던 CVM을 보행환경개선사업의 가치 추정에 적용하였다. 이를 통해 주민들의 지불의사를 알아보고 보행환경개선사업으로 인한 편익을 정량적으로 산정해 보고자 한다. 이를 위해 본 연구에서는 쾌적하고 편안한 보행환경이 조성된다는 가상시나리오를 구축하여 보여주고, 지불형태, 지불유도방법 등을 고려하여 보행환경개선 사업지역에 인접해 있는 성북구 주민을 대상으로 설문조사를 실시하였다. 설문조사를 토대로 하여 성북구 주민들의 지불의사를 추정해본 결과 보행환경 개선시 매월 627원의 보행환경 개선 부담금을 지불하고자 하는 것으로 나타났다. 그리고 보행환경 개선으로 인한 연간 총편익을 추정해보면 1,247,516,820원에서 286,305,110원에 이르는 것으로 추정되었다.

In this study of estimating the benefits of environmental materials, the CVM method used in environmental economics was applied to estimate the value of pedestrian environment improvement. After finding the Willingness To Pay (WTP) level of residents through CVM, this study attempts to calculate quantitative benefits from the pedestrian environment improvement. In this study, a survey targeting the inhabitants in Seongbuk-gu adjacent to a business area was carried out for pedestrian environment improvement considering form of payment, willingness to pay and such by establishing and showing several virtual scenarios depicting a quiet and comfortable pedestrian environment. As a result, the willingness to pay level of the Seongbuk-gu residents was 627 won of surcharge for pedestrian environment improvement per month. Additionally, the annual total benefits by pedestrian environment improvement was estimated within a range from 1,247,516,820 won to 286,305,110 won.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Alebrini A(1995), Efficiency vs. Bias of Willingness to Pay Estimates: Bivariate and Interval-Data Models, Jof Environmental Economics and Management, Vol.29, No.2, pp.169-181. https://doi.org/10.1006/jeem.1995.1039
  2. Arrow K. and R. Lind(1970), Uncertainty and the Evaluation of Public Investment Decisions, American Economic Review, Vol.60, pp.364-378.
  3. Arrow K., R. Solow, P. Portney, E. Leamer, R. Radner and H. Shuman(1993), Report of the NOAA Panel on Contingent Valuation, Federal Register, US. Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Vol.58, pp.4601-4614.
  4. Ben-Akiva M. and S. Lerman(1994), Discrete Choice Analysis, MIT Press.
  5. Bergstrom J. J. Stoll and A. Randall(1989), Information Effects in Contingent Markets, American Journal of Agricultural Economcis, Vol.70, pp.685-691.
  6. Bishop R., P. Champ and D. Mullarkey (1995), Contingent Valuation, in the Handbook of Environmental Economics, eds. D. W. Bromely, Blackwell Publisher.
  7. Brent R.(1995), Applied Cost-Benefit Analysis, Edward Elgar Press.
  8. Cameron T.(1988), A New Paradigm for Valuing Non-Maket Goods Using Referendum Data: Maximum Likelihood Estimation by Censored Logistic Regression," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Vol.15, pp.355-379. https://doi.org/10.1016/0095-0696(88)90008-3
  9. Cameron T. A.(1991), Interval Estimates of Non-Market Resource Values from Referendum Contingent Valuation Surveys, Land Economics, Vol.67, No.4, pp.413-421. https://doi.org/10.2307/3146548
  10. Cameron T. and D. James(1987), Efficient Estimation Methods for Closed-ended Contingent Valuation Surveys, Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol.69, pp.269- 276. https://doi.org/10.2307/1927234
  11. Cameron T. and J. Quggin(1994), Estimation Using Contingent Valuation Data from a Dichotonomous Choice with Follow-Up Questions, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Vol.27, pp.218-234. https://doi.org/10.1006/jeem.1994.1035
  12. Carson R.(1997), Contingent Valuation: Theoretical Advances and Empirical Tests Since the NOAA Panel," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol.79, pp.1501- 1507. https://doi.org/10.2307/1244371
  13. Carson R. and R. Mitchell(1993), The Value of Clean Water: The Public's Willingness to Pay for Boatable, Fishable and Swimmable Quality Water, Water Resources Research, Vol.29, pp.2445-2454. https://doi.org/10.1029/93WR00495
  14. Desvousges W. V. K. Smith and A. Fisher(1987), Option Price Estimates for Water Quality Improvements: A Contingent Valuation Study for the Monongahela River, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Vol.14, pp.248-267. https://doi.org/10.1016/0095-0696(87)90019-2
  15. Freeman III, A. M.(1993), The Measurement of Environmental and Resource Values: Theory and Methods, Resource for the Future, Washington D.C.
  16. Georgiou S., D. Whittington, D. Pearce and D. Moran(1997), Economic Values and the Environment in the Developing World, Edward Elgar, Press.
  17. Greene W.(1992), Econometric Analysis, Macmillan Publishing Company.
  18. Greene W.(1998), LIMDEP-Version 7.0, Econometric Software, INC.
  19. Hanemann W.(1984), Welfare Evaluations in Contingent Valuation Experiment with Discrete Response, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol.66, pp.332-341. https://doi.org/10.2307/1240800
  20. Hanemann W., J. Loomis and B. Kaninnen (1991), Statistical Efficiency of Double- Bounded Dichotonomous Choice Contingent Valuation, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol.73, pp.1255-1263. https://doi.org/10.2307/1242453
  21. Hanley N. and C. Spash(1993), Cost- Benefit Analysis and the Environment, Edward Elgar Press.
  22. Jakbesson K. and A. Dragun(1996), Contingent Valuation and Endangered Species, Edward Elgar Press.

피인용 문헌

  1. Economic Effect Analysis for Bike-Sharing in KOREA - Focus on Goyang and Changwon City - vol.16, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.7855/IJHE.2014.16.1.063
  2. A Study on the Implementation of Walking Environment Projects by Analyzing Characteristics of Pedestrian Accidents by Local Government Types vol.32, pp.6, 2014, https://doi.org/10.7470/jkst.2014.32.6.615
  3. 조건부 가치측정법을 이용한 사용자 경험 디자인 가치평가 모델의 탐색 잠금해제 인터페이스를 중심으로 vol.11, pp.1, 2012, https://doi.org/10.17210/jhsk.2016.05.11.1.11