DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effect of Bacteriophage Supplementation on the Growth Performance, Nutrient Digestibility, Blood Characteristics, and Fecal Microbial Shedding in Growing Pigs

  • Yan, L. (Department of Animal Resource and Science, Dankook University) ;
  • Hong, S.M. (Department of Animal Resource and Science, Dankook University) ;
  • Kim, I.H. (Department of Animal Resource and Science, Dankook University)
  • 투고 : 2012.05.10
  • 심사 : 2012.07.03
  • 발행 : 2012.10.01

초록

A total of 144 ((Duroc${\times}$Yorkshire)${\times}$Landrace)) pigs with an average initial BW of $28.85{\pm}0.63$ kg were used in this 6-wk growth trial. Pigs were randomly allotted to 1 of 4 treatments in a completely random block design. Each dietary treatment consisted of 9 replicate pens, with 4 pigs per replicate. Dietary treatments included: i) NC (basal diet), ii) PC (NC+apramycin 0.5 g/kg), iii) BPT1 (NC+bacteriophage 0.25 g/kg) and iv) BPT2 (NC+bacteriophage 0.5 g/kg). The inclusion of antibiotics and bacteriophages did not affect the (p>0.05) ADG, ADFI and G:F compared with the basal diet. Dietary antibiotics and bacteriophages supplementation led to a higher (p<0.05) DM digestibility than the NC treatment. Pigs fed the bacteriophage supplemented diet increased (p<0.05) the N digestibility compared with those fed NC treatment. Supplementation of antibiotics led to a higher (p<0.05) energy digestibility than the NC treatment. No difference (p>0.05) was observed in the RBC, WBC, lymphocyte concentration and fecal moisture among treatments. Pigs fed PC and BPT2 treatments reduced (p<0.05) the E. coli concentration compared with those fed NC treatment. The inclusion of BPT2 treatment led to a higher (p<0.05) lactobacillus concentration compared with NC and PC treatment. Dietary antibiotic and bacteriophage supplementation reduced (p<0.05) the Salmonella concentration compared with NC treatment. In conclusion, our study suggested that bacteriophage at the level of 0.5 g/kg could be used as an antibiotics alternative for growing pigs.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. AOAC. 2000. Official methods of analysis. 17th ed. Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Gaithersburg, MD.
  2. Barrow, P. 2001. The use of bacteriophages for treatment and prevention of bacterial disease in animals and animal models of human infection. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 76:677-682. https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.436
  3. de Vrese, M. and P. R. Marteau. 2007. Probiotics and prebiotics: Effects on diarrhea. J. Nutr. 137:803S-811S.
  4. Forshell, L. P., and M. Wierup. 2006. Salmonella contamination: A significant challenge to the global marketing of animal food products. Rev. Sci. Tech. Off. Int. Epizoot. 25:541-554.
  5. Gebru, E., J. S. Lee, J. C. Son, S. Y. Yang, S. A. Shin, B. Kim, M. K. Kim and S. C. Park. 2010. Effect of probiotics, bacteriophage, or organic acid supplemented feeds or fermented soybean meal on the growth performance, acute phase response, and bacterial shedding of grower pig challenged with Salmonella enteric serotype Typhimurium. J. Anim. Sci. 88:3880-3886. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2010-2939
  6. Hart, G. K. and G. J. Dobb. 1988. Effect of a fecal bulking agent on diarrhea during enteral feeding in the critically ill. J. Parenter. Enteral Nutr. 12:465-468. https://doi.org/10.1177/0148607188012005465
  7. Jamalludeen, N., R. P. Johnson, P. E. Shewen and C. L. Gyles. 2009. Evaluation of bacteriphages for prevention and treatment of diarrhea due to experimental enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli O149 infection of pigs. Vet. Microbiol. 136:135-141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2008.10.021
  8. Lee, N. and D. L. Harris. 2001. The Effect of Bacteriophage Treatment as a Preharvest Intervention Strategy to Reduce the Rapid Dissemination of Salmonella typhimurium in Pigs. American Association of Swine Veterinarians (AASV), Perry, IA: AASV, pp. 555-557.
  9. Metchnikoff, E. 1908. The prolongation of life: optimistic studies. London: Heinemann. pp. 116-132.
  10. Nagy, B. and P. Z. Fekete. 1999 Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) in farm animal. Vet. Res. 30:259-284.
  11. National Research Council. 1998. Nutrient requirement of pigs 10th Ed. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, USA.
  12. SAS. 1996. SAS user's guide: Statistics. Version 7.0th edn. SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina.
  13. Smith, H. W. and M. B. Huggins. 1982. Successful treatment of experimental Escherichia coli infections in mice using phage: its general superiority over antibiotics. J. Gen. Microbiol. 128: 307-318.
  14. Wang, J. P., J. S. Yoo, H. J. Kim, J. H. Lee and I. H. Kim. 2009. Nutrient digestibility, blood profiles and fecal microbiota are influenced by chitooligosaccharide supplementation of growing pigs. Livest. Sci. 125:298-303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2009.05.011
  15. Wall, S. K., J. Zhang, M. H. Rostagno and P. D. Ebner. 2010. Phage therapy to reduce pre-processing Salmonella infections in market weight swine. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 76:48-53. doi:10.1128/AEM.00785-09.
  16. Williams, C. H., D. J. David and O. Iismaa. 1962. The determination of chromic oxide in faeces samples by atomic absorption spectrophotometery. J. Agric. Sci. 59:381-385. https://doi.org/10.1017/S002185960001546X
  17. Yan, L., J. P. Wang, H. J. Kim, Q. W. Meng, X. Ao, S. M. Hong and I. H. Kim. 2010. Influence of essential oil supplementation and diets with different nutrient densities on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, blood characteristics, meat quality and fecal noxious gas content in grower-finisher pigs. Livest. Sci. 128:115-122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2009.11.008
  18. Yan, L., Q. W. Meng and I. H. Kim. 2011a. The effects of dietary Houttuynia cordata and Taraxacum officinale extract powder on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, blood characteristics and meat quality in finishing pigs. Livest. Sci. 141:188-193 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2011.05.017
  19. Yan, L., J. H. Lee, Q. W. Meng and I. H. Kim. 2011b. Evaluation of the Anion supplementation on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, blood characteristics and fecal noxious gas content in weaning pigs. J. Appl. Anim. Res. 39:36-40. https://doi.org/10.1080/09712119.2011.565568
  20. Yan, L., Q. W. Meng and I. H. Kim. 2011c. The effect of an herb extract mixture on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, blood characteristics and fecal noxious gas content in growing pigs. Livest. Sci. 141:143-147 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2011.05.011
  21. Yan, L., Q. W. Meng and I. H. Kim. 2012. Effect of an herb extract mixture on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, blood characteristic, and fecal microbial shedding in weaning pigs. Livest. Sci. 145:189-195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2012.02.001
  22. Zhao, P. Y. and I. H. Kim. 2012. Effects of bacteriophage supplementation on egg performance, egg quality, excreta microflora, and moisture content in laying hens. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 25:1015-1020. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2012.12026

피인용 문헌

  1. Effects of Dietary Supplementation of Bacteriophage on Growth Performance, Nutrient Digestibility, Blood Profiles, Carcass Characteristics and Fecal Microflora in Broilers vol.40, pp.1, 2013, https://doi.org/10.5536/KJPS.2013.40.1.075
  2. Effects of Dietary Probiotics as an Alternative to Antibiotics on Growth Performance, Biochemical Characteristics and Immune Response in Weaning Pigs vol.24, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.5352/JLS.2014.24.4.352
  3. Bacteriophages as antimicrobial agents against major pathogens in swine: a review vol.6, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40104-015-0039-7
  4. spp. shedding in a challenging environment vol.101, pp.5, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1111/jpn.12567
  5. Analysis of the effect of dietary protected organic acid blend on lactating sows and their piglets vol.45, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1590/S1806-92902016000200001
  6. Bacteriophage cocktail and multi-strain probiotics in the feed for weanling pigs: effects on intestine morphology and targeted intestinal coliforms and Clostridium vol.11, pp.01, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731116001166
  7. Alternatives to antibiotics as growth promoters for use in swine production: a review vol.4, pp.1, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1186/2049-1891-4-35
  8. Synergistic effect of phage therapy using a cocktail rather than a single phage in the control of severe colibacillosis in quails vol.98, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pey414
  9. 육계 사료 내 박테리오파지 CP의 첨가가 생산성, 영양소 소화율, 혈액특성, 도체특성 및 분내 미생물 조성에 미치는 영향 vol.40, pp.4, 2012, https://doi.org/10.5536/kjps.2013.40.4.283
  10. Effect of dietary supplementation of bacteriophage on performance, egg quality and caecal bacterial populations in laying hens vol.56, pp.1, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1080/00071668.2014.991272
  11. Dietary organic acids for broiler chickens: a review vol.28, pp.2, 2012, https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.rccp.v28n2a01
  12. Effects of dietary supplementation of bacteriophage with or without zinc oxide on the performance and gut development of weanling pigs vol.15, pp.3, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1080/1828051x.2016.1188676
  13. Evaluation of the broad-spectrum lytic capability of bacteriophage cocktails against various Salmonella serovars and their effects on weaned pigs infected with Salmonella Typhimurium vol.80, pp.6, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1292/jvms.17-0501
  14. Veterinary use of bacteriophage therapy in intensively-reared livestock vol.16, pp.1, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12985-019-1260-3
  15. Bacteriophage as an Alternative to Antibiotics Promotes Growth Performance by Regulating Intestinal Inflammation, Intestinal Barrier Function and Gut Microbiota in Weaned Piglets vol.8, pp.None, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2021.623899
  16. Phage Therapy in Veterinary Medicine vol.10, pp.4, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10040421
  17. Old problems and new solutions: antibiotic alternatives in food animal production vol.67, pp.6, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1139/cjm-2020-0601
  18. Maximum levels of cross‐contamination for 24 antimicrobial active substances in non‐target feed. Part 2: Aminoglycosides/aminocyclitols: apramycin, paromomycin, neomycin and spectinomyci vol.19, pp.10, 2021, https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6853