The Journal of the Institute of Internet, Broadcasting and Communication (한국인터넷방송통신학회논문지)

The Institute of Internet, Broadcasting and Communication (한국인터넷방송통신학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Performance Analysis of Cost-Effective Inter-LMA Domain Handover Scheme in PMIPv6 Networks with NEMO Supporting

NEMO를 지원하는 프록시 모바일 IPv6 네트워크에서 비용효과적인 LMA 도메인간 핸드오버 기법의 성능분석

  • 이윤수 (성균관대학교 정보통신대학원) ;
  • 정종필 (성균관대학교 정보통신공학부)
  • Received : 2011.12.29
  • Accepted : 2012.02.10
  • Published : 2012.02.29
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Now, there are many mobile nodes are efficient and stable when they move to operate with variety techniques have emerged.Recently, there is a growing interest about PMIPv6(Proxy Mobile IPv6) and, in this proposal of essay is the based on the way to mobility support system will stand on the basis from PMIPv6 network to NEMO(Network Mobility). PMIPv6 is mobility support system from single domain, it actual network is composed with nested in a multiple domain structural system. The proposed technique in the domain of two or more, the LMA(Local Mobility Anchor) communication between LMA(Local Mobility Anchor) and MAG(Mobile Access Gateway) of movable domain can increase performance by handover delay and signaling.

현재 다수의 단말이 이동시에 효율적이고 안정적으로 동작할 수 있는 다양한 기술들이 등장하고 있다. 최근들어 PMIPv6(Proxy Mobile IPv6)에 대한 관심이 증가하고 있고 본 논문에서 제안한 이동성 지원 방식은 PMIPv6 네트워크에서 NEMO(Network Mobility)를 지원하는 방식을 기반으로 하고 있다. PMIPv6는 한 개의 도메인에서 이동성을 지원하는 방식인데, 실제 네트워크는 여러개의 도메인이 중첩되어 있는 구조로 구성되어 있다. 제안한 기술은 두 개 이상의 도메인에서 LMA(Local Mobility Anchor)간에 통신하는 단계를 LMA와 이동할 도메인의 MAG(Mobile Access Gateway)간에 통신함으로써 핸드오버 지연 및 시그널링 측면에서 성능 향상을 보여준다.

Keywords

References

  1. D.Johnson, C. Perkins, and J. Arkko, Mobility Support in IPv6 RFC 3775, Jun. 2004
  2. V.Devarapalli, R. Wakikawa, A. Petrescu, and P.Thubert, Network Mobility(NEMO) Basic Support Protocol RFC 3963, Jan. 2005
  3. J.-H. Lee, Y-H. Han, S. Gundavelli, and T.-M. Chung, "A comparative performance analysis on hierarchical mobile IPv6 and proxy mobile IPv6, "Telecommun. Syst., vol. 41, no. 4,pp.279-292, Aug. 2009 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11235-009-9163-z
  4. J-H. Lee, T. Ernst, and T.-M Chung, "Cost analysis of IP mobility management protocols for consumer mobile devices," IEEE Trans. Consumer Electron., vol. 56, no. 2, pp.1010-1017, May 2010. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCE.2010.5506033
  5. J-H. Lee, T. Ernst, and T.-M Chung, "Lightweight NEtwork Mobility within PMIPv6 for transportation systems" IEEE Trans. Consumer Electron., vol. 5, no. 3, pp.101-112, May 2010.
  6. S.Gundavelli, K. Leung, V. Devarapalli, K. Chowdhury, and B. Patil, Proxy Mobile IPv6 RFC 5213, Aug. 2008
  7. H-J. Lim, M. Kim, J -H. Lee, and T.-M. Chung, "Route optimization in nested NEMO: Classification, evaluation and analysis from NEMO fringe stub perspective, "IEEE Trans. Mobile Comput., vol. 8, no. 11, pp. 1544-1572, Nov. 2009.
  8. A. Muhanna, M. Khalil, S. Gundavelli, K. Chowdhury, and P. Yegani, Binding Revocation for IPv6 Mobility RFC 5846, Jun. 2010.
  9. H. Kim and J.-H. Lee, "Diffe-Hellman key based authentication in proxy mobile IPv6," Mobile inf. Syst, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 107-121, Apr. 2010 https://doi.org/10.1155/2010/934286
  10. S. Thomson, T. Narten, and T. Jinmei, IPv6 Stateless Address Auto-configuration RFC 4862, Sep. 200