DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Partial sublingual glandectomy with ranula excision: a new conservative method for treatment

  • Chung, In-Kyo (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Lee, Hyo-Ji (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Hwang, Dae-Seok (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Kim, Yong-Deok (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Park, Hae-Ryoun (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Shin, Sang-Hun (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Kim, Uk-Kyu (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Lee, Jae-Yeol (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University)
  • Received : 2012.02.06
  • Accepted : 2012.03.16
  • Published : 2012.06.30

Abstract

Objectives: This study evaluated the clinical results of partial sublingual glandectomy accompanying the excision of ranula as new treatment modality. Materials and Methods: A total of 43 patients who were treated between 1999 and 2007 for oral or plunging ranula were reviewed. All patients were treated surgically by various methods with a total of 55 different procedures performed. Ten cases of partial sublingual glandectomy with excision of the ranula were conducted. All excised specimens were examined. We compared the clinical outcomes resulting from each treatment method. Results: The recurrence rates for marsupialization, excision of ranula, marsupialization with gauze packing, total excision of sublingual gland and ranula, and partial sublingual glandectomy with excision of ranula were 50%, 25%, 25%, 0% and 10%, respectively. Of the 10 patients treated by partial sublingual glandectomy with ranula excision, only one experienced recurrence (10%), i.e., plunging ranula. None of the ranulas contained an epithelial lining, and the excised portion of the feeding sublingual glands showed degenerative changes. Conclusion: In removal of ranulas, we found that excision of the attached sublingual gland, which removed the feeding portion and degenerative acinar cells, yielded good outcomes. Thus, as a new conservative method for treatment, we recommend partial sublingual glandectomy to accompany excision of the ranula.

Keywords

References

  1. Baurmash HD. Mucoceles and ranulas. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2003;61:369-78.
  2. Baurmash HD. A case against sublingual gland removal as primary treatment of ranulas. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007;65:117-21.
  3. Kurabayashi T, Ida M, Yasumoto M, Ohbayashi N, Yoshino N, Tetsumura A, et al. MRI of ranulas. Neuroradiology 2000;42:917-22.
  4. Shelley MJ, Yeung KH, Bowley NB, Sneddon KJ. A rare case of an extensive plunging ranula: discussion of imaging, diagnosis, and management. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2002;93:743-6.
  5. Baurmash HD. Marsupialization for treatment of oral ranula: a second look at the procedure. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1992;50: 1274-9.
  6. Baurmash HD. Treating oral ranula: another case against blanket removal of the sublingual gland. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2001;39:217-20.
  7. Yoshimura Y, Obara S, Kondoh T, Naitoh S. A comparison of three methods used for treatment of ranula. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1995;53:280-2.
  8. Crysdale WS, Mendelsohn JD, Conley S. Ranulas--mucoceles of the oral cavity: experience in 26 children. Laryngoscope 1988;98:296-8.
  9. Galloway RH, Gross PD, Thompson SH, Patterson AL. Pathogenesis and treatment of ranula: report of three cases. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1989;47:299-302.
  10. Morita Y, Sato K, Kawana M, Takahasi S, Ikarashi F. Treatment of ranula--excision of the sublingual gland versus marsupialization. Auris Nasus Larynx 2003;30:311-4.
  11. Catone GA, Merrill RG, Henny FA. Sublingual gland mucus-escape phenomenon--treatment by excision of sublingual gland. J Oral Surg 1969;27:774-86.
  12. Barnes L. Surgical pathology of the head and neck. 1st ed. New York: Marcel Dekker; 1985:1297-301.
  13. Marx RE, Stern D. Oral and maxillofacial pathology. Illinois: Quintessence Publishing; 2003:511.
  14. Zhao YF, Jia Y, Chen XM, Zhang WF. Clinical review of 580 ranulas. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2004;98:281-7.
  15. Bridger AG, Carter P, Bridger GP. Plunging ranula: literature review and report of three cases. Aust N Z J Surg 1989;59:945-8.
  16. Zhao YF, Jia J, Jia Y. Complications associated with surgical management of ranulas. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2005;63:51-4.
  17. Quick CA, Lowell SH. Ranula and the sublingual salivary glands. Arch Otolaryngol 1977;103:397-400.
  18. Harrison JD, Garrett JR. An ultrastructural and histochemical study of a naturally occurring salivary mucocele in a cat. J Comp Pathol 1975;85:411-6.
  19. Chidzonga MM, Mahomva L. Ranula: experience with 83 cases in Zimbabwe. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007;65:79-82.
  20. Frame JW. Removal of oral soft tissue pathology with the CO2 laser. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1985;43:850-5.
  21. Mintz S, Barak S, Horowitz I. Carbon dioxide laser excision and vaporization of nonplunging ranulas: a comparison of two treatment protocols. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1994;52:370-2.
  22. Woo JS, Hwang SJ, Lee HM. Recurrent plunging ranula treated with OK-432. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2003;260:226-8.
  23. Fukase S, Ohta N, Inamura K, Aoyagi M. Treatment of ranula wth intracystic injection of the streptococcal preparation OK-432. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2003;112:214-20.
  24. Martis C. Parotid benign tumors: comments on surgical treatment of 263 cases. Int J Oral Surg 1983;12:211-20.
  25. Milstein BB. Regeneration in the submaxillary gland of the rat. Br J Exp Pathol 1950;31:664-9.
  26. Hanks CT, Chaudhry AP. Regeneration of rat submandibular gland following partial extirpation. A light and electron microscopic study. Am J Anat 1971;130:195-207.