Journal of Gastric Cancer

  • 제12권1호
  • /
  • Pages.26-35
  • /
  • 2012
  • /
  • 2093-582X(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2093-5641(eISSN)
대한위암학회 (The Korean Gastric Cancer Association)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analysis of Risk Factors for Postoperative Morbidity in Perforated Peptic Ulcer

  • Kim, Jae-Myung (Department of Surgery, Postgraduate School of Medicine, Gyeongnam Regional Cancer Center, Institute of Health Sciences, Gyeongsang National University) ;
  • Jeong, Sang-Ho (Department of Surgery, Postgraduate School of Medicine, Gyeongnam Regional Cancer Center, Institute of Health Sciences, Gyeongsang National University) ;
  • Lee, Young-Joon (Department of Surgery, Postgraduate School of Medicine, Gyeongnam Regional Cancer Center, Institute of Health Sciences, Gyeongsang National University) ;
  • Park, Soon-Tae (Department of Surgery, Postgraduate School of Medicine, Gyeongnam Regional Cancer Center, Institute of Health Sciences, Gyeongsang National University) ;
  • Choi, Sang-Kyung (Department of Surgery, Postgraduate School of Medicine, Gyeongnam Regional Cancer Center, Institute of Health Sciences, Gyeongsang National University) ;
  • Hong, Soon-Chan (Department of Surgery, Postgraduate School of Medicine, Gyeongnam Regional Cancer Center, Institute of Health Sciences, Gyeongsang National University) ;
  • Jung, Eun-Jung (Department of Surgery, Postgraduate School of Medicine, Gyeongnam Regional Cancer Center, Institute of Health Sciences, Gyeongsang National University) ;
  • Ju, Young-Tae (Department of Surgery, Postgraduate School of Medicine, Gyeongnam Regional Cancer Center, Institute of Health Sciences, Gyeongsang National University) ;
  • Jeong, Chi-Young (Department of Surgery, Postgraduate School of Medicine, Gyeongnam Regional Cancer Center, Institute of Health Sciences, Gyeongsang National University) ;
  • Ha, Woo-Song (Department of Surgery, Postgraduate School of Medicine, Gyeongnam Regional Cancer Center, Institute of Health Sciences, Gyeongsang National University)
  • 투고 : 2011.12.16
  • 심사 : 2012.03.08
  • 발행 : 2012.03.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Purpose: Emergency operations for perforated peptic ulcer are associated with a high incidence of postoperative complications. While several studies have investigated the impact of perioperative risk factors and underlying diseases on the postoperative morbidity after abdominal surgery, only a few have analyzed their role in perforated peptic ulcer disease. The purpose of this study was to determine any possible associations between postoperative morbidity and comorbid disease or perioperative risk factors in perforated peptic ulcer. Materials and Methods: In total, 142 consecutive patients, who underwent surgery for perforated peptic ulcer, at a single institution, between January 2005 and October 2010 were included in this study. The clinical data concerning the patient characteristics, operative methods, and complications were collected retrospectively. Results: The postoperative morbidity rate associated with perforated peptic ulcer operations was 36.6% (52/142). Univariate analysis revealed that a long operating time, the open surgical method, age (${\geq}60$), sex (female), high American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score and presence of preoperative shock were significant perioperative risk factors for postoperative morbidity. Significant comorbid risk factors included hypertension, diabetes mellitus and pulmonary disease. Multivariate analysis revealed a long operating time, the open surgical method, high ASA score and the presence of preoperative shock were all independent risk factors for the postoperative morbidity in perforated peptic ulcer. Conclusions: A high ASA score, preoperative shock, open surgery and long operating time of more than 150 minutes are high risk factors for morbidity. However, there is no association between postoperative morbidity and comorbid disease in patients with a perforated peptic ulcer.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Chalya PL, Mabula JB, Koy M, McHembe MD, Jaka HM, Kabangila R, et al. Clinical profile and outcome of surgical treatment of perforated peptic ulcers in Northwestern Tanzania: A tertiary hospital experience. World J Emerg Surg 2011;6:31. https://doi.org/10.1186/1749-7922-6-31
  2. Makela J, Laitinen S, Kairaluoma MI. Complications of peptic ulcer disease before and after the introduction of H2-receptor antagonists. Hepatogastroenterology 1992;39:144-148.
  3. Noguiera C, Silva AS, Santos JN, Silva AG, Ferreira J, Matos E, et al. Perforated peptic ulcer: main factors of morbidity and mortality. World J Surg 2003;27:782-787. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-003-6645-0
  4. Scheeres DE, DeKryger LL, Dean RE. Surgical treatment of peptic ulcer disease before and after introduction of H2 blockers. Am Surg 1987;53:392-395.
  5. Imhof M, Epstein S, Ohmann C, Roher HD. Duration of survival after peptic ulcer perforation. World J Surg 2008;32:408-412. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-007-9370-2
  6. Rahman MM, Islam MS, Flora S, Akhter SF, Hossain S, Karim F. Mortality in perforated peptic ulcer patients after selective management of stratified poor risk cases. World J Surg 2007;31:2341-2344. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-007-9165-5
  7. Bittner R, Butters M, Ulrich M, Uppenbrink S, Beger HG. Total gastrectomy. Updated operative mortality and long-term survival with particular reference to patients older than 70 years of age. Ann Surg 1996;224:37-42. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-199607000-00006
  8. Habu H, Endo M. Gastric cancer in elderly patients--results of surgical treatment. Hepatogastroenterology 1989;36:71-74.
  9. Jeong SH, Ahn HS, Yoo MW, Cho JJ, Lee HJ, Kim HH, et al. Increased morbidity rates in patients with heart disease or chronic liver disease following radical gastric surgery. J Surg Oncol 2010;101:200-204.
  10. Fitz-Henry J. The ASA classification and peri-operative risk. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2011;93:185-187. https://doi.org/10.1308/147870811X565070
  11. Lohsiriwat V, Prapasrivorakul S, Lohsiriwat D. Perforated peptic ulcer: clinical presentation, surgical outcomes, and the accuracy of the Boey scoring system in predicting postoperative morbidity and mortality. World J Surg 2009;33:80-85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-008-9796-1
  12. Boey J, Choi SK, Poon A, Alagaratnam TT. Risk stratification in perforated duodenal ulcers. A prospective validation of predictive factors. Ann Surg 1987;205:22-26. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-198701000-00005
  13. Linder MM, Wacha H, Feldmann U, Wesch G, Streifensand RA, Gundlach E. The Mannheim peritonitis index. An instrument for the intraoperative prognosis of peritonitis. Chirurg 1987;58:84-92.
  14. Lau WY, Leung KL, Zhu XL, Lam YH, Chung SC, Li AK. Laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer. Br J Surg 1995;82:814-816. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.1800820630
  15. Sanabria AE, Morales CH, Villegas MI. Laparoscopic repair for perforated peptic ulcer disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005;(4):CD004778.
  16. Siu WT, Leong HT, Law BK, Chau CH, Li AC, Fung KH, et al. Laparoscopic repair for perforated peptic ulcer: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 2002;235:313-319. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-200203000-00001
  17. Hwang J, Kim JM, Kim HS. Clinical study and factors influencing postoperative morbidity in perforated peptic ulcer patients. J Korean Surg Soc 2007;73:130-137.
  18. Heo IU, Kim HK, Lee SZ. A clinical study on peptic ulcer perforation. J Korean Surg Soc 1984;27:567-575.
  19. Kang G, Kim CY, Min YD, Kim SH. Results of surgical treatment for perforated peptic ulcer. J Korean Surg Soc 1993;44:214-222.
  20. Park JS, Kang JK. A clinical review in ulcer perforation of stomach and duodenum. J Korean Surg Soc 1983;25:736-744.
  21. Kang RG, Jung SY, Suh JW. A clinical evaluation and follow up results of the surgical management on 172 patients with perforated peptic ulcer. J Korean Surg Soc 1992;42:292-303.
  22. Lee HW, Ahn SI, Yang DH, Lee CH, Sohn JH, Kwon OJ, et al. A clinical review of peptic ulcer during 22 yrs (1968-1989). J Korean Surg Soc 1993;44:159-174.
  23. Bae SW, Hwang JY, Lee YG. A clinical study of perforated peptic ulcer. J Korean Surg Soc 1989;36:737-743.
  24. Shin HW, Moon SH, Lee YC, Kim JS, Chung BW, Chung KS. APACHE II score in emergency operation for perforation of gastroduodenal ulcer. J Korean Surg Soc 1994;47:501-509.
  25. Sonnenberg A. Changes in physician visits for gastric and duodenal ulcer in the United States during 1958-1984 as shown by National Disease and Therapeutic Index (NDTI). Dig Dis Sci 1987;32:1-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01296680
  26. Testini M, Portincasa P, Piccinni G, Lissidini G, Pellegrini F, Greco L. Significant factors associated with fatal outcome in emergency open surgery for perforated peptic ulcer. World J Gastroenterol 2003;9:2338-2340.
  27. Ko JW, Hong SJ, Ban JY, Kim JH. Risk factors associated with mortality in emergency surgery for perforated peptic ulcer. J Korean Surg Soc 2004;67:373-378.
  28. Hirsch IB, McGill JB. Role of insulin in management of surgical patients with diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care 1990;13:980-991. https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.13.9.980
  29. Stagnaro-Green A. Perioperative glucose control: does it really matter? Mt Sinai J Med 1991;58:299-304.
  30. Schiff RL, Welsh GA. Perioperative evaluation and management of the patient with endocrine dysfunction. Med Clin North Am 2003;87:175-192. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0025-7125(02)00150-5

피인용 문헌

  1. Emergent laparoscopy in treatment of perforated peptic ulcer: a local experience from a tertiary centre in Saudi Arabia vol.8, pp.None, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1186/1749-7922-8-10
  2. Scoring systems for outcome prediction in patients with perforated peptic ulcer vol.21, pp.None, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1186/1757-7241-21-25
  3. The Selective Use of Laparoscopic Repair is Safe in High-Risk Patients Suffering from Perforated Peptic Ulcer vol.39, pp.3, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-014-2851-1
  4. A practical scoring system to predict mortality in patients with perforated peptic ulcer vol.10, pp.None, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-015-0008-7
  5. Prognostic Factors in Peptic Ulcer Perforations: A Retrospective 14-Year Study vol.100, pp.5, 2012, https://doi.org/10.9738/intsurg-d-14-00187.1
  6. Postoperative Morbidity and Mortality of Perforated Peptic Ulcer: Retrospective Cohort Study of Risk Factors among Black Africans in Côte d'Ivoire vol.2016, pp.None, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/2640730
  7. Relationship between low body mass index and morbidity after gastrectomy for gastric cancer vol.90, pp.4, 2012, https://doi.org/10.4174/astr.2016.90.4.207
  8. Long-term prognosis in patients continuing taking antithrombotics after peptic ulcer bleeding vol.23, pp.4, 2012, https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v23.i4.723
  9. CLINICOPATHOLOGICAL EVALUATION OF PREOPERATIVE FINDINGS AND OUTCOME OF PERFORATION PERITONITIS vol.6, pp.29, 2012, https://doi.org/10.14260/jemds/2017/504
  10. Preoperative factors influencing mortality and morbidity in peptic ulcer perforation vol.44, pp.2, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-017-0777-7
  11. Is the Platelet to Lymphocyte Ratio a Potential Biomarker for Predicting Mortality in Peptic Ulcer Perforation? vol.20, pp.4, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1089/sur.2018.288
  12. Patients With Perforated Peptic Ulcers: Risk Factors for Morbidity and Mortality vol.103, pp.11, 2012, https://doi.org/10.9738/intsurg-d-15-00180.1
  13. Seasonal Pattern of Peptic Ulcer Perforation in Central Anatolia vol.10, pp.31, 2021, https://doi.org/10.14260/jemds/2021/501
  14. Low serum albumin may predict poor efficacy in patients with perforated peptic ulcer treated nonoperatively vol.13, pp.10, 2021, https://doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v13.i10.1226
  15. Stent treatment or surgical closure for perforated duodenal ulcers: a prospective randomized study vol.35, pp.12, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-08158-3