Journal of Fisheries and Marine Sciences Education (수산해양교육연구)

The Korean Society for Fisheries and Marine Sciences Education (한국수산해양교육학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Women Leadership Education: Educational Experience, Exploration about their Characteristics - On the women learner at the P center in Busan

여성리더십교육: 교육적 경험, 그 특성에 관한 탐색 - 부산지역 P기관의 여성 학습자들을 중심으로 -

  • Received : 2012.02.01
  • Accepted : 2012.05.11
  • Published : 2012.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This paper focuses on understanding what kind of experience the women leadership education can provide for adult learners and how the learners grasp a characteristic of a women leader. For this, the research interviewed learner who complete the women leadership course at the P center in Busan. To this end, it is discussed in two sides. One side is about educational experience, the other side is about leadership. In the aspect of former approach, the leadership education shows the characteristic which is much closer to the meaning of the education itself rather than that of leadership. It not only put much emphasize on the recovery to the self but also shows the relation-oriented characteristic like building up social net-work. In the aspect of the latter, by connecting the woman and leader, women expects they wish to be a 'trustful leader'. For them, 'trustful leader' is the true leader. In addition it also means 'charismatic leader', 'servant leader', 'the leader with member to growth' and 'the leader with a rational and reasonable'. Although women acknowledge that women leader's authority and power is important for the realization of the real equality of women, at the same time, however, they worry about the possibility that this leader become a kind of a 'power-oriented leader' which causes conflict and suppress the weaker. This study argues that we need to concentrate more on the new perspective which focuses on the sharing and bordering occurred in inner gender rather than the former approach which focuses on the difference between genders.

Keywords

References

  1. 강형철 외(2004). 여성리더십의 재발견, 숙명여자대학교출판국.
  2. 김양희(2006). 여성, 리더 그리고 여성리더십, 삼성경제연구소.
  3. 문형남.문승권(2005). 섬김 리더십의 모델, 사례 및 적용 방안, 숙명리더십연구 1(1), 143-174.
  4. 신경림(2007). 질적연구 방법, 서울: 현문사.
  5. 이상화 외 13(1999). 여성과 철학-페미니즘과 차이의 정치학, 167-181, 서울: 철학과 현실사.
  6. 장필화(2004). 여성리더, 여성적 리더십, 여성주의적 리더십, 이화리더십개발원 개원 1주년기념 학술대회자료집.
  7. 허란주 외 13(1999).여성과 철학-페미니즘과 차이의 정치학, 31-49, 서울: 철학과 현실사.
  8. Adler, S., Laney, J., & Packer, M. (1993). Managing women: Feminism and power in educational management, Buckingham, England: Open University Press.
  9. Caffarella, R. S., & Olson, S.K.(1993). Psychological development of women: A critical review of the literature, Adult Education Quarterly, 4(3), 125-151.
  10. Davies, L.(1990). Equity and efficiency? School management in an international context, London: Falmer Press.
  11. Dilthey, W. 이한우 역(2005). 체험․표현․이해, 서울: 책세상.
  12. English, M. L., & Irving, J. C.(2008). Reflexive Texts: Issues of knowledge, power, and discourse in researching gender and learning. Adult Education Quarterly, 58(4), 267-283. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741713608322019
  13. Foucault, M. et.al. 황정미 역(1995). 섹슈얼리티와 정치와 페미니즘, 서울: 새물결.
  14. Foucault, M. 이규현 역(1997). 성의 역사: 앎의 의지, 나남출판.
  15. Freedman, J. 이박혜경 역((2002). 페미니즘, 이후.
  16. Giroux, H. 이경숙 역(2003). 교사는 지성인이다, 아침이슬.
  17. Grundy, S.(1993). Educational leadership as emancipatory praxis. In J. Blackmore & J. Kenway(Eds.), Gender matters in educational administration and policy: A feminist introduction (165-177), London: Falmer Press.
  18. Hall, T. E. 최효선 역(2000). 침묵의 언어, 한길사.
  19. Helgesen, S.(1990). The female advantage: Women's ways of leadership, New York: Doubleday Currency.
  20. Hunter, C. J. 김광수 역(2006). 서번트 리더십2, 서울: 시대의창.
  21. Hurty, K. S.(1995). Women principlals-leading with power, In D. M. Dunlap, & P.A.
  22. Lefebvre, H.(1998). 강수택(역). 유토피아적 일상생활 비판론, 일상생활의 패러다임: 현대 사회학의 이해, 48-81. 서울: 민음사.
  23. Mills, A. J., & Tancred, P.(Eds.)(1992). Gendering organizational analysis, Newbury Park, C. A.: Sage Publications.
  24. Naddings, N.(1990). Feminist critiques in the professions. In C. B. Cazden(Ed.), Review of Research in Education, Vol. 16, 393-424.
  25. Pillow, (2003). Confession, catharsis, or cure? Rethinking the uses of reflexivity as methodological power in qualitative research, Qualitative Studies in Education, 16(2), 175-196. https://doi.org/10.1080/0951839032000060635
  26. Senge, M. P. 안중호 역(1996). 제5경영, 세종서적.
  27. Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J.(1990). Basics of Qualitative Research, London:Sage.
  28. Schutz, A. 강수택 역(1998). 일상생활세계의 의미구조론, 일상생활의 패러다임: 현대 사회학의 이해, 119-182. 서울: 민음사.
  29. van Manen, M.(1990). Researching lived experience: Human science for an action sensitive pedagogy, London, ON: Althouse.