DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Usefulness of the Endonasal Incisional Approach for the Treatment of Nasal Bone Fracture

  • Kim, Hyo-Seong (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Bundang Jesaeng General Hospital) ;
  • Suh, Hyeun-Woo (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Bundang Jesaeng General Hospital) ;
  • Ha, Ki-Young (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Bundang Jesaeng General Hospital) ;
  • Kim, Boo-Yeong (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Bundang Jesaeng General Hospital) ;
  • Kim, Tae-Yeon (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Bundang Jesaeng General Hospital)
  • 투고 : 2012.01.20
  • 심사 : 2012.04.01
  • 발행 : 2012.05.15

초록

Background : Among all facial fractures, nasal bone fractures are the most common, and they have been reduced by closed reduction (CR) for a long time. But several authors have reported suboptimal results when using CR, and the best method of nasal bone reduction is still being debated. We have found that indirect open reduction (IOR) through an endonasal incisional approach is a useful method for more accurate reduction of the nasal bone. Methods : A retrospective chart review was performed of 356 patients who underwent reduction of a nasal bone fracture in our department from January, 2006, to July, 2011. We treated 263 patients with IOR. We assessed patients' and doctors' satisfaction with surgical outcomes after IOR or CR. We evaluated the frequency of nasal bleeding owing to mucosal injury, and followed the surgical outcomes of patients who had simultaneous dorsal augmentation rhinoplasty. Results : According to the analysis of the satisfaction scores, both patients and doctors were significantly more satisfied in the IOR group than the CR group (P<0.05). Mucosal injury with nasal bleeding occurred much less in the IOR group (5.3%) than the CR group (12.9%). Dorsal augmentation rhinoplasty with IOR was performed simultaneously in 34 cases. Most of them (31/34) showed satisfaction with the outcomes. Conclusions : IOR enables surgeons to manipulate the bony fragment directly through the endonasal incisional approach. However, we propose that CR is the proper technique for patients under 16 and for those with comminuted nasal bone fractures because submucosal dissection in IOR can damage the growth or circulation of nasal bone.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Murray JA, Maran AG, Mackenzie IJ, et al. Open v closed reduction of the fractured nose. Arch Otolaryngol 1984;110: 797-802. https://doi.org/10.1001/archotol.1984.00800380027008
  2. Rohrich RJ, Adams WP Jr. Nasal fracture management: minimizing secondary nasal deformities. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000;106:266-73. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-200008000-00003
  3. Burm JS, Oh SJ. Indirect open reduction through intercartilaginous incision and intranasal Kirschner wire splinting of comminuted nasal fractures. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998; 102:342-9. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199808000-00007
  4. Kim NY, Lee SH, Choi HG, et al. Simultaneous rhinoplasty with fracture reduction in nasal bone fracture. J Korean Soc Plast Reconstr Surg 2008;35:589-96.
  5. Tremolet de Villers Y. Nasal fractures. J Trauma 1975;15: 319-27. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005373-197504000-00008
  6. Fry HJ. Interlocked stresses in human nasal septal cartilage. Br J Plast Surg 1966;19:276-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-1226(66)80055-3
  7. Higuera S, Lee EI, Cole P, et al. Nasal trauma and the deviated nose. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007;120:64S-75S. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000260722.91183.50
  8. Kim JH, Park SH, Chu HH, et al. The postoperative analysis of closed reducted nasal bone fracture. J Korean Soc Plast Reconstr Surg 1997;24:1343-51.

피인용 문헌

  1. A Comparative Study of CG CryoDerm and AlloDerm in Direct-to-Implant Immediate Breast Reconstruction vol.40, pp.4, 2013, https://doi.org/10.5999/aps.2013.40.4.374
  2. Usefulness of Indirect Open Reduction and External Fixation in Algorithm Oriented Treatment of Nasal Fracture vol.14, pp.2, 2012, https://doi.org/10.7181/acfs.2013.14.2.81
  3. Nasal bone fractures are successfully managed under local anaesthesia – experience on 483 patients vol.41, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1111/coa.12456
  4. Fractures of the Nasal Bones: Is External Splinting Really Warranted? vol.28, pp.8, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1097/scs.0000000000003936
  5. The Algorithm-Oriented Management of Nasal Bone Fracture according to Stranc's Classification System vol.18, pp.2, 2012, https://doi.org/10.7181/acfs.2017.18.2.97
  6. Usefulness of indirect open reduction via a transconjunctival approach for the treatment of nasal bone fracture associated with orbital blowout fracture vol.19, pp.2, 2012, https://doi.org/10.7181/acfs.2018.00010
  7. Finger reduction of nasal bone fracture under local anesthesia: outcomes and patient reported satisfaction vol.20, pp.1, 2019, https://doi.org/10.7181/acfs.2018.02222