Archives of Plastic Surgery

Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons (대한성형외과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Vein Wrapping Technique for Nerve Reconstruction in Patients with Thyroid Cancer Invading the Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve

  • Yoo, Young-Moon (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Ajou University Hospital, Ajou University School of Medicine) ;
  • Lee, Il-Jae (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Ajou University Hospital, Ajou University School of Medicine) ;
  • Lim, Hyo-Seob (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Ajou University Hospital, Ajou University School of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Joo-Hyoung (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Ajou University Hospital, Ajou University School of Medicine) ;
  • Park, Myong-Chul (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Ajou University Hospital, Ajou University School of Medicine)
  • Received : 2011.10.06
  • Accepted : 2011.12.19
  • Published : 2012.01.15
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis is the most common and serious complication after thyroid cancer surgery. The objective of this study was to report the advantages of the vein wrapping technique for nerve reconstruction in patients with thyroid cancer invading the recurrent laryngeal nerve and its effects on postoperative phonatory function. The subjects were three patients who underwent resection of the recurrent laryngeal nerve during surgical extirpation of papillary thyroid cancer. Free ansa cervicalis nerve graft or direct neurorrhaphy with a vein wrapping technique was used to facilitate nerve regeneration, protect the anastomosed nerve site mechanically, and prevent neuroma formation. One-year postoperative laryngoscopic examination revealed good vocal cord mobility. Maximum phonation time ($19.5{\pm}0.3$ sec) was longer than a previously-reported value in conventional reconstruction patients ($18.8{\pm}6.6$ sec). The present phonation efficiency index ($7.88{\pm}0.78$) was higher than that previously calculated in conventional reconstruction ($7.59{\pm}2.82$). The mean value of the Voice Handicap Index-10 was 6, which was within the normal range. This study demonstrates improvement in phonation indices measured 1 year after recurrent laryngeal nerve reconstruction. Our results confirm that the vein wrapping technique has theoretical advantages and could be favored over conventional reconstruction techniques for invenerate nerve injuries.

Keywords

References

  1. Chiang FY, Lu IC, Kuo WR, et al. The mechanism of recurrent laryngeal nerve injury during thyroid surgery: the application of intraoperative neuromonitoring. Surgery 2008;143:743-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2008.02.006
  2. Snyder SK, Lairmore TC, Hendricks JC, et al. Elucidating mechanisms of recurrent laryngeal nerve injury during thyroidectomy and parathyroidectomy. J Am Coll Surg 2008;206:123-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.07.017
  3. Yumoto E, Sanuki T, Kumai Y. Immediate recurrent laryngeal nerve reconstruction and vocal outcome. Laryngoscope 2006;116:1657-61. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mlg.0000233245.27582.fc
  4. Miyauchi A, Matsusaka K, Kihara M, et al. The role of ansato- recurrent-laryngeal nerve anastomosis in operations for thyroid cancer. Eur J Surg 1998;164:927-33.
  5. Lubiatowski P, Unsal FM, Nair D, et al. The epineural sleeve technique for nerve graft reconstruction enhances nerve recovery. Microsurgery 2008;28:160-7. https://doi.org/10.1002/micr.20472
  6. Battiston B, Geuna S, Ferrero M, et al. Nerve repair by means of tubulization: literature review and personal clinical experience comparing biological and synthetic conduits for sensory nerve repair. Microsurgery 2005;25:258-67. https://doi.org/10.1002/micr.20127
  7. Heijke GC, Klopper PJ, Baljet B, et al. Silicone rubber tubulization in peripheral sensory nerve reconstruction: an experimental study in rabbits. Microsurgery 2001;21:306-16. https://doi.org/10.1002/micr.1057
  8. Meyer RS, Abrams RA, Botte MJ, et al. Functional recovery following neurorrhaphy of the rat sciatic nerve by epineurial repair compared with tubulization. J Orthop Res 1997;15:664-9. https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.1100150506
  9. Miyauchi A, Inoue H, Tomoda C, et al. Improvement in phonation after reconstruction of the recurrent laryngeal nerve in patients with thyroid cancer invading the nerve. Surgery 2009;146:1056-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2009.09.018
  10. Rosen CA, Lee AS, Osborne J, et al. Development and validation of the voice handicap index-10. Laryngoscope 2004;114:1549-56. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005537-200409000-00009
  11. Arffa RE, Krishna P, Gartner-Schmidt J, et al. Normative values for the voice handicap index-10. J Voice 2011 Aug 3 [Epub]. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2011.04.006.
  12. O'Neill JP, Fenton JE. The recurrent laryngeal nerve in thyroid surgery. Surgeon 2008;6:373-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1479-666X(08)80011-X
  13. Galeano M, Manasseri B, Risitano G, et al. A free vein graft cap influences neuroma formation after nerve transection. Microsurgery 2009;29:568-72. https://doi.org/10.1002/micr.20652

Cited by

  1. Routine exposure of recurrent laryngeal nerve in thyroid surgery can prevent nerve injury vol.8, pp.17, 2013, https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1673-5374.2013.17.004
  2. Functional and electrophysiological outcome after autogenous vein wrapping of primary repaired ulnar nerves vol.34, pp.5, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1002/micr.22207
  3. Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cell and Vein Conduit on Sciatic Nerve Repair in Rats vol.20, pp.1, 2012, https://doi.org/10.5812/traumamon.23325
  4. Longitudinal Voice Outcomes Following Laryngeal Reinnervation Via Vagus-to-Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve Anastomosis After Vagal Nerve Sacrifice : A Case Series vol.124, pp.2, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1177/0003489414546397
  5. Attempt of peripheral nerve reconstruction during lung cancer surgery vol.9, pp.5, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.12619
  6. Sutureless approach with vein grafts and mesenchymal stem cells in primary nerve repair: Functional and immunohistological results vol.38, pp.7, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1002/micr.30315