Distortion Correction in Magnetic Resonance Images on the Measurement of Muscle Cross-sectional Area

자기공명영상을 이용한 근육 단면적 측정법의 활용을 위한 영상왜곡보정

  • Hong, Cheol-Pyo (Department of Radiological Science, College of Health Science, Yonsei University) ;
  • Lee, Dong-Hoon (Department of Radiological Science, College of Health Science, Yonsei University) ;
  • Park, Ji-Won (Department of Physical Therapy, College of Medical Science, Catholic University of Daegu) ;
  • Han, Bong-Soo (Department of Radiological Science, College of Health Science, Yonsei University)
  • 홍철표 (연세대학교 보건과학대학 방사선학과) ;
  • 이동훈 (연세대학교 보건과학대학 방사선학과) ;
  • 박지원 (대구가톨릭대학교 물리치료학과) ;
  • 한봉수 (연세대학교 보건과학대학 방사선학과)
  • Received : 2012.03.21
  • Accepted : 2012.04.17
  • Published : 2012.04.25

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to explore the importance of the image distortion correction in the cross sectional area measurement for the iliopsas muscle, tensor fasciae latae muscle, gluteus maximus muscle and the knee extensor muscles, by using (magnetic resonance imaging) MRI. Methods: This study was performed using an open 0.32T MRI system. To estimate the image distortion, T1 images for an AAPM homogeneity/linearity phantom were acquired, and the region in which the maximum geometric distortion was less than or equal to the pixel size (1.6 mm) of the images, it was defined as the distortion correction-free region. The T2 images for a human subject's pelvis and thigh in normal positions were obtained. Then, after the regions of interest in the pelvis and thigh were moved into the distortion correction-free region, T2 images for the pelvis and thigh were scanned with the same imaging parameters used in the previous T2 imaging. The cross-sectional areas were measured in the two T2 images that were obtained in the normal position, and the distortion correction-free region, as well as the area error caused by geometric image distortion was calculated. Results: The geometrical distortion is gradually increased, from the magnet center to the outer region, in axial and coronal plane. The cross-sectional area error of gluteus maximus muscle and the knee extensors was as high as 9.27% and 3.16% in before and after distortion correction, respectively. Conclusion: The cross-sectional area of the muscles that suffered from the geometrical distortion is necessary to correct for the estimation of the intervention.

Keywords

References

  1. Aagaard P, Andersen JL, Dyhre-Poulsen P et al. A mechanism for increased contractile strength of human pennate muscle in response to strength training: Changes in muscle architecture. J Physiol. 2001;534(Pt. 2):613-23.
  2. Kawakami Y, Abe T, Kuno SY et al. Training-induced changes in muscle architecture and specific tension. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1995;72(1-2):37-43. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00964112
  3. Lexell J. Human aging, muscle mass, and fiber type composition. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 1995;50 Spec:11-6.
  4. Visser M, Kritchevsky SB, Goodpaster BH et al. Leg muscle mass and composition in relation to lower extremity performance in men and women aged 70 to 79: The health, aging and body composition study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2002;50(5):897-904. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1532-5415.2002.50217.x
  5. Kim SY. Changes in cross-sectional area of lumbar muscle in patients with chronic back pain. J Korean Soc Phys Ther. 2010;22(5):39-47.
  6. Kim SH, Lee WH. Effects of spinal stabilization exercises on the cross-sectional areas of the lumbar multifidus and psoas major muscles of patients with degenerative disc disease. J Korean Soc Phys Ther. 2010;22(3):9-15.
  7. Han SW, Lee JW. Effects of isokinetic exercise on muscular performance and thickness of the quadriceps muscle. J Korean Soc Phys Ther. 2010;22(4):49-55.
  8. Lang T, Cauley JA, Tylavsky F et al. Computed tomographic measurements of thigh muscle cross-sectional area and attenuation coefficient predict hip fracture: The health, aging, and body composition study. J Bone Miner Res. 2010;25(3):513-9. https://doi.org/10.1359/jbmr.090807
  9. Leroy-Willig A, Willig TN, Henry-Feugeas MC et al. Body composition determined with mr in patients with duchenne muscular dystrophy, spinal muscular atrophy, and normal subjects. Magn Reson Imaging. 1997;15(7):737-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0730-725X(97)00046-5
  10. Scott SH, Engstrom CM, Loeb GE. Morphometry of human thigh muscles. Determination of fascicle architecture by magnetic resonance imaging. J Anat. 1993;182 (Pt 2):249-57.
  11. Hudelmaier M, Wirth W, Himmer M et al. Effect of exercise intervention on thigh muscle volume and anatomical cross-sectional areas--quantitative assessment using MRI. Magn Reson Med. 2010;64(6):1713-20. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.22550
  12. Higbie EJ, Cureton KJ, Warren GL 3rd et al. Effects of concentric and eccentric training on muscle strength, cross-sectional area, and neural activation. J Appl Physiol. 1996;81(5):2173-81.
  13. Masciocchi C, Barile A, Satragno L. Musculoskeletal MRI: dedicated systems. Eur Radiol. 2000;10(2):250-5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s003300050041
  14. Wang D, Strugnell W, Cowin G et al. Geometric distortion in clinical MRI systems part II: correction using a 3d phantom. Magn Reson Imaging. 2004;22(9):1223-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mri.2004.08.014
  15. Wang D, Strugnell W, Cowin G et al. Geometric distortion in clinical MRI systems part I: evaluation using a 3d phantom. Magn Reson Imaging. 2004;22(9):1211-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mri.2004.08.012
  16. Tracy BL, Ivey FM, Jeffrey Metter E et al. A more efficient magnetic resonance imaging-based strategy for measuring quadriceps muscle volume. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003;35(3):425-33. https://doi.org/10.1249/01.MSS.0000053722.53302.D6
  17. Eng CM, Abrams GD, Smallwood LR et al. Muscle geometry affects accuracy of forearmvolume determination by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). J Biomech. 2007;40(14):3261-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2007.04.005
  18. Roig M, O'Brien K, Kirk G et al. The effects of eccentric versus concentric resistance training on muscle strength and mass in healthy adults: A systematic review with meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med. 2009;43(8):556-68. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsm.2008.051417