DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Abiotic effects on calling phenology of three frog species in Korea

  • Yoo, Eun-Hwa (Department of Life Sciences and Division of EcoScience, Ewha Womans University) ;
  • Jang, Yi-Kweon (Department of Life Sciences and Division of EcoScience, Ewha Womans University)
  • Received : 2011.04.17
  • Accepted : 2011.09.15
  • Published : 2012.06.30

Abstract

Calling behavior is often used to infer breeding patterns in anurans. We studied the seasonal and diel calling activities of anuran species in a wetland in central Korea to determine the calling season and to evaluate the effects of abiotic factors on male calling. Acoustic monitoring was used in which frog calls were recorded for a full day, once a week, throughout an entire year. Using acoustic monitoring, we identified three frog species in the study site. Males of Rana dybowskii called in late winter and early spring; we thus classified this species as a winter/spring caller. The results of binary logistic regression showed that temperature, relative humidity, and 1-day lag rainfall were significant factors for male calling in R. dybowskii. Temperature and relative humidity were important factors for the calling activity of R. nigromaculata, whereas 24-h rainfall and 1-day lag rainfall were not significant. Thus, we determined R. nigromaculata to be a summer caller independent of weather. In Hyla japonica, relative humidity, 24-h rainfall, and 1- day lag rainfall were significant for male calling, suggesting that this species is a summer caller dependent on local rain.

Keywords

References

  1. Amey AP, Grigg GC. 1995. Lipid-reduced evaporative water loss in two arboreal hylid frogs. Comp Biochem Physiol 111:283-291.
  2. Bertoluci J, Rodrigues MT. 2002. Seasonal patterns of breeding activity of Atlantic Rainforest anurans at Boraceia, Southeastern Brazil. Amphibia-Reptilia 23:161-167. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853802760061804
  3. Bridges AS, Dorcas ME, Montgomery WL. 2000. Temporal variation in anuran calling behavior: Implications for surveys and monitoring programs. Copeia 587-592.
  4. Canelas MAS, Bertoluci J. 2007. Anurans of the Serra do Caraca, southeastern Brazil: Species composition and phenological patterns of calling activity. Iheringia Ser Zool 97:21-26. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0073-47212007000100004
  5. Conant S. 1988. Geographic variation in the Laysan Finch (Telespyza cantans). Evol Ecol 2:270-282. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02214287
  6. Crump ML. 1974. Reproductive strategies in a tropical anuran community. Miscellaneous Publications of the Museum of Natural History of the University of Kansas 61:1-68.
  7. Dorcas ME, Price SJ, Walls SC, Barichivich WJ. 2009. Auditory monitoring of anuran populations. In: Dodd CK, editor. Amphibian ecology and conservation. New York: Oxford University Press. p. 281-298.
  8. Duellman WE, Trueb L. 1994. Biology of amphibians. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
  9. Gerhardt HC, Huber F. 2002. Acoustic communication in insects and anurans. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  10. John-Alder HB, Morin PJ, Lawler S. 1988. Thermal physiology, phenology, and distribution of tree frogs. Am Nat 132:506-520. https://doi.org/10.1086/284868
  11. Kim J-K, Lee JH, Ra N-Y, Lee H-J, Eom J, Park D. 2009. Reproductive function of the body tail undulations of Hynobius leechi (Amphibia: Hynobiidae): A quantitative approach. Anim Cells Syst 13:71-78. https://doi.org/10.1080/19768354.2009.9647195
  12. Kirlin MS, Gooch MM, Price SJ, Dorcas ME. 2006. Predictors of winter anuran calling activity in the North Carolina Piedmont. J N Car Acad Sci 122:10-18.
  13. Oseen K, Wassersug R. 2002. Environmental factors influencing calling in sympatric anurans. Oecologia 133:616-625. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-002-1067-5
  14. Park S-R, Yang S-Y. 1997. Mating call structure and variation of the frog Rana nigromaculata. Korean J Ecol 20:423-438.
  15. Park S-R, Cheon S-M, Yang S-Y. 1996. The classification of call types in genus Hyla in habitats around South Korea. Korean J Zool 39:207-214.
  16. Prado CPA, Uetanabaro M, Haddad CFB. 2005. Breeding activity patterns, reproductive modes, and habitat use by anurans (Amphibia) in a seasonal environment in the Pantanal, Brazil. Amphibia-Reptilia 26:211-221. https://doi.org/10.1163/1568538054253375
  17. R Development Core Team. 2010. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
  18. Richter-Boix A, Llorente GA, Montori A. 2006. Breeding phenology of an amphibian community in a Mediterranean area. Amphibia-Reptilia 27:549-559. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853806778877149
  19. Saenz D, Fitzgerald LA, Baum KA, Conner RN, Adams D. 2006. Abiotic correlates of anuran calling phenology: The importance of rain, temperature, and season. Herpetol Monogr 20:64-82. https://doi.org/10.1655/0733-1347(2007)20[64:ACOACP]2.0.CO;2
  20. Schmidt-Nielsen K. 1997. Animal physiology: adaptation and environment. 5th ed. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  21. Suzuki M, Hasegawa T, Ogushi Y, Tanaka S 2007. Amphibian aquaporins and adaptation to terrestrial environments: a review. Comp Biochem Physiol 148:72-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpa.2006.12.021
  22. Wells KD. 1977. The social behaviour of anuran amphibians. Anim Behav 25:666-693. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-3472(77)90118-X
  23. Wells KD. 2007. The ecology and behavior of amphibians. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  24. Wygoda ML. 1984. Low cutaneous evaporative water loss in arboreal frogs. Physiol Zool 57:329-337. Yang S-Y. 2000. Monograph of Korean Amphibia. Seoul: Academy Books.
  25. Yang S-Y. 2000. Monograph of Korean Amphibia. Seoul: Academy Books.
  26. Yang S-Y, Kim JB, Min MS, Suh JH, Kang YJ. 2001. Korean Amphibians. Seoul: Academy Books.

Cited by

  1. Evolution under unpredictable environmental conditions: quantitative genetics of larval life-history traits in a myobatrachid frog Crinia georgiana vol.16, pp.5, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1080/19768354.2012.715594
  2. Age estimation by skeletochronology and advertisement call variation in the black-spotted pond frog (Rana nigromaculata) vol.17, pp.2, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1080/19768354.2013.778215
  3. No reproductive character displacement in male advertisement signals of Hyla japonica in relation to the sympatric H. suweonensis vol.67, pp.8, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-013-1563-0
  4. Morphometrics of two sympatric species of tree frogs in Korea: a morphological key for the critically endangered Hyla suweonensis in relation to H. japonica vol.17, pp.5, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1080/19768354.2013.842931
  5. Allocation trade-off under climate warming in experimental amphibian populations vol.3, pp.None, 2015, https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1326
  6. Temperature-induced shifts in hibernation behavior in experimental amphibian populations vol.5, pp.None, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1038/srep11580
  7. Description of a seminatural habitat of the endangered Suweon treefrogHyla suweonensis vol.19, pp.3, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1080/19768354.2015.1028442
  8. Asymmetric competition over calling sites in two closely related treefrog species vol.6, pp.None, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1038/srep32569
  9. Water Temperature and Sound Environment Characteristics of Huanren Brown Frog Oviposition Sites vol.30, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.13047/kjee.2016.30.3.344
  10. 도심지 열대야 및 빛공해에 의한 매미 울음 영향 vol.30, pp.4, 2012, https://doi.org/10.13047/kjee.2016.30.4.724
  11. Introduced bullfrogs are associated with increased Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis prevalence and reduced occurrence of Korean treefrogs vol.12, pp.5, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0177860
  12. Population trend inferred from aural surveys for calling anurans in Korea vol.6, pp.None, 2012, https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.5568
  13. Effects of environmental variables on the calling behaviour of Northern Leopard Frogs (Lithobatespipiens) in Alberta, Canada vol.96, pp.2, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1139/cjz-2016-0239
  14. Correlation between temperature and the timing of arrival of geese in South Korea vol.42, pp.4, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1186/s41610-018-0091-2
  15. Interspecific Variation in Seasonal Migration and Brumation Behavior in Two Closely Related Species of Treefrogs vol.7, pp.None, 2012, https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2019.00055
  16. Breeding preferences in the treefrogs Dryophytes japonicus (Hylidae) in Mongolia vol.53, pp.43, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1080/00222933.2019.1704458
  17. Ecoacoustics of small forest patches in agricultural landscapes: acoustic diversity and bird richness increase with patch size vol.21, pp.1, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1080/14888386.2020.1733086
  18. Ueno’s brown frog Rana uenoi indiscriminately ceases calling in the presence of daytime birds vol.32, pp.3, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1080/03949370.2020.1717638
  19. Brain profiling of endogenous Neuropeptide Y (NPY) in distinct reproductive phases of adult male Microhyla ornata vol.740, pp.None, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2020.135409
  20. First detection of ranavirus in a wild population of Dybowski's brown frog (Rana dybowskii) in South Korea vol.45, pp.1, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1186/s41610-020-00179-2