DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Evaluation on Clamping Force of High Strength Bolts By Coating Parameters of Faying Surfaces

고력볼트 접합부표면의 방식도장변수에 따른 체결력 평가

  • Nah, Hwan Seon (Korea Electric Power Corporation Research Institute) ;
  • Lee, Hyeon Ju (Korea Electric Power Corporation Research Institute)
  • 나환선 (한국전력공사 전력연구원) ;
  • 이현주 (한국전력공사 전력연구원)
  • Received : 2012.03.26
  • Accepted : 2012.04.26
  • Published : 2012.04.30

Abstract

Clamping force of a high strength bolt is reduced by a certain period of time after the initial set-up. In case of special treatments on faying surfaces such as protective coating, clamping force is relaxed more severely. Tests for slip critical joints subject to various faying surface parameters were conducted. Five different surface treatments were tested including mill scale surface, blast surface, rust surface and coated surfaces. Each specimen was composed of F10T M20 of high strength bolts and steel plates. Based on the result of slip coefficient test, blast treatment surface showed 0.59, rust treatment surface showed 0.54 and inorganic zinc treatment surface exhibited 0.44. Clean mill treatment surface and red lead paint treatment surface were 0.23, 0.21 respectively. It is identified that the slip coefficient in Korean structural design guide should be determined for various surface conditions. Subsequently from long term relaxation test of ASTM A 490 high strength bolts, relaxation of no-coated surfaces such as blast, clean mill, rust treatment, the loss of initial clamping load was 10.5%, 13.6% and 7.9% for 1,000 hours, while the loss of initial clamping force was reached as 15.0%, 18.7% more than the required redundancy 10% in case of inorganic zinc and red lead painted treatment. It is required that the limit of relaxation on coated faying surface should be established separately for various surfaces.

Keywords

References

  1. Arch. Inst. of Japan, Guidebook on Design and Fabrication of High Strength Bolted Connections, p. 111, Arch. Inst. of Japan (2003).
  2. ASTM F 2280-06, p. 150, ASTM International (2006).
  3. K. Frank and J. Yura, FHWA/ RD-81/148, p. 29, US Depart. of Transportation, Federal Highway Association (1981).
  4. G. L. Kulak, J. W. Fisher, and J. H. A. Struik, Guide to Design Criteria for Bolted and Riveted Joints, p. 61, 2nd Ed., AISC Inc. (2001).
  5. J. Yang and J. DeWolf, J. Bridge Eng., 5, 99 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2000)5:2(99)
  6. J. H. Kim, J. Arch. Inst. Korea, 19, 27 (2003).
  7. H. S. Nah, H. J. Lee, K. S. Kim, J. H. Kim, and W. B. Kim, Inter. J. Steel Struc., 9, 123 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03249487
  8. H. S. Nah, H. J. Lee, K. S. Kim, J. H. Kim, and W. B. Kim, Inter. J. Steel Struc., 10, 295 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03215838
  9. Y. M. Park and T. R. Song, J. Korean Steel Struc., 12, 167 (2000).

Cited by

  1. A Study on the Secure Plan of Clamping Force according to the Variation of Torque-Coefficient in Torque-Shear High Strength Bolts vol.5, pp.3, 2014, https://doi.org/10.11004/kosacs.2014.5.3.008