DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effect of Anterior Guidance Change on the Condylar Path in Skeletal Class I Young Adult Women Using a Splint with Flat or Steep Anterior Guidance

  • Choi, Byung-Taek (Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Baek, Seung-Hak (Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Dental Research Institute, Seoul National University)
  • Received : 2011.12.28
  • Accepted : 2012.04.10
  • Published : 2012.06.30

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the effects of anterior guidance (AG) change on the working (WCP) and non-working condylar paths (NWCP), and lower incisor path (LIP) using a splint with flat (FAG) or steep AG (SAG). Materials and Methods: The samples consisted of six young adult women (mean age=$23.5{\pm}3.3$ years). Inclusion criteria were skeletal Class I and normodivergent pattern, normal overbite/overjet, minimal slide from retruded cuspal position to intercuspal position, no temporomandibular disorder signs and symptoms, mutually protected occlusion, and minimal tooth wear. After the values of natural AG (NAG) were obtained as a reference for each patient, two types of splints ($15^{\circ}$ flatter and steeper than NAG) were made. After insertion of the splints with FAG or SAG, the WCP, NWCP, and LIP were recorded five times for each patient using an ultrasonic AQR (SAM, Munich, Germany) and statistical analysis was subsequently performed. Result: NAG exhibited postero-superior movement in the WCP and did not show a noticeable immediate side shift (ISS) or difference between the eccentric (EP) and returning paths (RP) in the NWCP. FAG was associated with an irregular and excessive WCP, an increase in ISS, and a difference between EP and RP in the NWCP. SAG showed minimal WCP movement and a decrease in the extent of difference between EP and RP in the NWCP. LIP showed significant differences in EP and in RP (P<0.001, all; FAG

Keywords

References

  1. Michelotti A, Iodice G. The role of orthodontics in temporomandibular disorders. J Oral Rehabil. 2010; 37: 411-29. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2010.02087.x
  2. Bales JM, Epstein JB. The role of malocclusion and orthodontics in temporomandibular disorders. J Can Dent Assoc. 1994; 60: 899-905.
  3. Luther F. TMD and occlusion part I. Damned if we do? Occlusion: the interface of dentistry and orthodontics. Br Dent J. 2007; 202: E2. https://doi.org/10.1038/bdj.2006.122
  4. McNamara JA Jr, Seligman DA, Okeson JP. Occlusion, Orthodontic treatment, and temporomandibular disorders: a review. J Orofac Pain. 1995; 9: 73-90.
  5. Koak JY, Kim KN, Heo SJ. A study on the mandibular movement of anterior openbite patients. J Oral Rehabil. 2000; 27: 817-22. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.2000.00655.x
  6. Hagag G, Yoshida K, Miura H. Occlusion, prosthodontic treatment, and temporomandibular disorders: a review. J Med Dent Sci. 2000; 47: 61-6.
  7. Egermark I, Magnusson T, Carlsson GE. A 20-year follow-up of signs and symptoms of temporomandibular disorders and malocclusions in subjects with and without orthodontic treatment in childhood. Angle Orthod. 2003; 73: 109-15.
  8. Gray HS. Occlusion and restorative dentistry: Part II. N Z Dent J. 1993; 89: 87-91.
  9. Hobo S, Takayama H. Effect of canine guidance on the working condylar path. Int J Prosthodont. 1989; 2: 73-9.
  10. Lotzmann U, Jablonski F, Scherer C, Kobes L. The neuromuscular effect of anterior guidance on the protrusive movement pattern of the mandible. Observations in the horizontal plane. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed. 1990; 100: 560-4.
  11. Nishigawa K, Nakano M, Bando E, Clark GT. Effect of altered occlusal guidance on lateral border movement of the mandible. J Prosthet Dent. 1992; 68: 965-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(92)90559-S
  12. Hobo S. Twin-tables technique for occlusal rehabilitation: Part I--Mechanism of anterior guidance. J Prosthet Dent. 1991; 66: 299-303. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(91)90253-S
  13. Ogawa M, Ogawa T, Koyano K, Suetsugu T. Effect of altered canine guidance on condylar movement during laterotrusion. Int J Prosthodont. 1998; 11: 139-44.
  14. Kimmel SS. Temporomandibular disorders and occlusion: an appliance to treat occlusion generated symptoms of TMD in patients presenting with deficient anterior guidance. Cranio. 1994; 12: 234-40. https://doi.org/10.1080/08869634.1994.11678027
  15. Baqaien MA, Barra J, Muessig D. Computerized axiographic evaluation of the changes in sagittal condylar path inclination with dental and physical development. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009; 135: 88-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.01.030
  16. dos Santos J: Occlusion: principles and concepts. St. Louis, Tokyo: Ishiyaku EuroAmerica Inc.; 1985.
  17. Cho Y, Hobo S, Takahashi H: Occlusion. Seoul: Koonja Publishing Inc.; 1996.
  18. Isberg A: Temporomandibular joint dysfunction: a practitioner's guide. Oxford: Isis Medical Media Ltd.; 2001.
  19. Broderson SP. Anterior guidance--the key to successful occlusal treatment. J Prosthet Dent. 1978; 39: 396-400. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(78)80155-3
  20. Otake T, Mayanagi A, Tsuruta J, Nozawa K, Miura H, Hasegawa S. The role of posterior guidances under the altered anterior guidance. J Oral Rehabil. 2002; 29: 1196-205. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.2002.00935.x
  21. Hobo S. Occlusion in temporomandibular disorders: treatment after occlusal splint therapy. Int Dent J. 1996; 46: 146-55.
  22. Henrikson T. Temporomandibular disorders and mandibular function in relation to Class II malocclusion and orthodontic treatment. A controlled, prospective and longitudinal study. Swed Dent J Suppl. 1999; 134: 1-144.
  23. Mohlin BO, Derweduwen K, Pilley R, Kingdon A, Shaw WC, Kenealy P. Malocclusion and temporomandibular disorder: a comparison of adolescents with moderate to severe dysfunction with those without signs and symptoms of temporomandibular disorder and their further development to 30 years of age. Angle Orthod. 2004; 74: 319-27.
  24. Gebeile-Chauty S, Robin O, Messaoudi Y, Aknin JJ. Can orthodontic treatment generate temporomandibular disorders and pain? A review. Orthod Fr. 2010; 81: 85-93. [French] https://doi.org/10.1051/orthodfr/2010009