DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effect of alginate chemical disinfection on bacterial count over gypsum cast

  • Haralur, Satheesh B. (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, King Khalid University) ;
  • Al-Dowah, Omir S. (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, King Khalid University) ;
  • Gana, Naif S. (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, King Khalid University) ;
  • Al-Hytham, Abdullah (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, King Khalid University)
  • Received : 2011.12.26
  • Accepted : 2012.02.21
  • Published : 2012.05.31

Abstract

PURPOSE. To evaluate the efficacy of sodium hypochlorite (1 : 10) and iodophor disinfectants on alginate impressions along with their effect on the survived bacterium count on the gypsum cast. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Four alginate impression on each dentate patients were made, of which Group I were not washed or disinfected, Group II impressions were merely washed with water, Group III were disinfected by spraying with sodium hypochlorite (1 : 10), Group IV were disinfected with iodophor (1 : 213). Gypsum cast (type III) were made from all the impression. Impressions and gypsum cast were swabbed in mid palatal region for bacterial culture. Bacterial colony counting done after 3 days of incubation at $37^{\circ}C$ in blood agar media. The data obtained was analyzed by one way ANOVA test at a significant difference level of 0.05. RESULTS. Group I and Group II showed significantly more bacteria compared to Group III and Group IV. Bacterial colonies on the alginate impression and gypsum cast in group disinfected with Sodium hypochlorite (1 : 10) were 0.18, 0.82 respectively compared to group treated with iodophor (1 : 213). There was an increase in bacterial count on dental cast compared to source alginate impressions. CONCLUSION. Sodium hypochlorite (1 : 10) was found to be better disinfectant for alginate impression. There was an indication of increase in number of bacteria from alginate impression to making of dental cast. Additional gypsum cast disinfectant procedures need to be encouraged to completely eliminate cross infection to dental laboratory.

Keywords

References

  1. Connor C. Cross-contamination control in prosthodontic practice. Int J Prosthodont 1991;4:337-44.
  2. Leung RL, Schonfeld SE. Gypsum casts as a potential source of microbial cross-contamination. J Prosthet Dent 1983;49:210- 1. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(83)90503-6
  3. Kugel G, Perry RD, Ferrari M, Lalicata P. Disinfection and communication practices: a survey of U.S. dental laboratories. J Am Dent Assoc 2000;131:786-92. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2000.0278
  4. Almortadi N, Chadwick RG. Disinfection of dental impressions - compliance to accepted standards. Br Dent J 2010;209:607-11. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2010.1134
  5. Powell GL, Runnells RD, Saxon BA, Whisenant BK. The presence and identification of organisms transmitted to dental laboratories. J Prosthet Dent 1990;64:235-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(90)90185-F
  6. Samaranayake LP, Hunjan M, Jennings KJ. Carriage of oral flora on irreversible hydrocolloid and elastomeric impression materials. J Prosthet Dent 1991;65:244-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(91)90169-W
  7. Jagger DC, Al Jabra O, Harrison A, Vowles RW, McNally L. The effect of a range of disinfectants on the dimensional accuracy of some impression materials. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2004;12:154-60.
  8. Martin N, Martin MV, Jedynakiewicz NM. The dimensional stability of dental impression materials following immersion in disinfecting solutions. Dent Mater 2007;23:760-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2007.01.004
  9. Taylor RL, Wright PS, Maryan C. Disinfection procedures: their effect on the dimensional accuracy and surface quality of irreversible hydrocolloid impression materials and gypsum casts. Dent Mater 2002;18:103-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(01)00027-6
  10. Westerholm HS 2nd, Bradley DV Jr, Schwartz RS. Efficacy of various spray disinfectants on irreversible hydrocolloid impressions. Int J Prosthodont 1992;5:47-54.
  11. Bergman B. Disinfection of prosthodontic impression materials: a literature review. Int J Prosthodont 1989;2:537-42.
  12. Wakefield CW. Laboratory contamination of dental prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 1980;44:143-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(80)90125-0
  13. Jagger DC, Huggett R, Harrison A. Cross-infection control in dental laboratories. Br Dent J 1995;179:93-6. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4808846
  14. Jennings KJ, Samaranayake LP. The persistence of microorganisms on impression materials following disinfection. Int J Prosthodont 1991;4:382-7.
  15. Rentzia A, Coleman DC, O'Donnell MJ, Dowling AH, O'Sullivan M. Disinfection procedures: their efficacy and effect on dimensional accuracy and surface quality of an irreversible hydrocolloid impression material. J Dent 2011;39:133-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2010.11.003
  16. Look JO, Clay DJ, Gong K, Messer HH. Preliminary results from disinfection of irreversible hydrocolloid impressions. J Prosthet Dent 1990;63:701-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(90)90329-B
  17. Infection control recommendations for the dental office and the dental laboratory. ADA Council on Scientific Affairs and ADA Council on Dental Practice. J Am Dent Assoc 1996;127:672- 80. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1996.0280

Cited by

  1. Análise da eficácia antimicrobiana do ácido peracético na desinfecção de moldes de hidrocoloide irreversível vol.45, pp.6, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-2577.27915
  2. Empirical study of alginate impression materials by customized proportioning system vol.8, pp.5, 2016, https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2016.8.5.372
  3. Investigation of Acrylic Resin Disinfection Using Chemicals and Ultrasound pp.1059941X, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12511
  4. Antibacterial Effect of Sanosil 2% and 6% and Sodium Hypochlorite 0.5% on Impressions of Irreversible Hydrocolloid (Alginate) and Condensational Silicone (Speedex) vol.5, pp.1, 2012, https://doi.org/10.17795/ajdr-21107
  5. 치과용 인상체의 감염 관리 vol.29, pp.2, 2012, https://doi.org/10.14368/jdras.2013.29.2.183
  6. Comportamentos na desinfeção das impressões dentárias por médicos dentistas e técnicos de prótese de Viseu vol.55, pp.4, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rpemd.2014.10.006
  7. Compliance with infection prevention and control in oral health-care facilities: a global perspective vol.64, pp.6, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1111/idj.12134
  8. The Dental Solid Waste Management in Different Categories of Dental Laboratories in Abha City, Saudi Arabia vol.9, pp.None, 2012, https://doi.org/10.2174/1874210601509010449