Journal of the Ergonomics Society of Korea (대한인간공학회지)

Ergonomics Society of Korea (대한인간공학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Evaluation of Postural Load during Liquid Weight Measurement Process Using Ratio of Exposure Time

  • Lee, Sung-Koon (Department of Industrial Engineering, Ajou University) ;
  • Park, Peom (Department of Industrial Engineering, Ajou University)
  • Received : 2012.01.12
  • Accepted : 2012.05.11
  • Published : 2012.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The aim of this paper was to prove that if the risk level in combined tasks was improved through evaluation of postural load of liquid weight measurement process, the workload level and ratio of exposure time would be changed, and the time of process would be seen concurrently. Background: According to results of epidemiological studies conducted by Korea Occupational Safety & Health Agency, 122 musculoskeletal disorders occurred during 1992 to 2008, in which manufacturing industry covers 96(78.7%) of total. However, this is an insufficient level and only occupies 39% based on the South Korea's manufacturing standard industrial classification(246 industries). Method: Firstly, the number of batches weighed on one day(460min) was investigated based on the work performed and Weight measured weekly. VCR recording was taken based on the level of liquid ingredients prescribed for 1batch using the Camcorder. After dividing a 356 sec video into 1 sec using the screen capture function in Gom player, the job classification was performed by analyzing the change of working postures, which revealed 148 working postures. Time measurement was decided by time of the postures was being maintained. Then, the REBA analysis was performed for the working postures. The ratio of Exposure time was calculated based on the measurement time and REBA Score. In addition, the recommendations were designed and implementation was carried out for the working postures with REBA Score higher than 3. Finally, after the intervention, REBA measurement, time measurement, and ratio of exposure time were calculated for the comparison of works before and after improvement. Results: The number of work elements was decreased by 30.4% from 148 to 103 after improvement. The results of time measurement showed that the time was reduced by 46.3% from 356 sec to 191 sec. And the ratio of exposure time was also improved by 52.1% from 0% to 52.1% after improvement. Conclusion: The reduction of time was found to improve the productivity of management. Furthermore, because the reduction of ratio of exposure time and the improvement of workload level are the improvement of discomfort, it would contribute to the improvement of the worker's psychological working posture. Application: These results would contribute to musculoskeletal disease prevention and management performance. Further studies for other industries would be needed based on this case study.

Keywords

References

  1. Barnes, R. M., Motion and Time Study Design and Measurement of Work, 7th ed., Wiley, 1980.
  2. Bernard, B., Musculoskeletal disorders and workplace factors: A critical review of epidemiologic evidence for work-related musculoskeletal disorders of the neck, upper extremity, low back, US Department of Health and Human Services, Publication No, pp97-141, 1997.
  3. Brown, R. and Li, G., The development of action levels for the 'Quick Exposure Check' (QEC) system, Contemporary Ergonomics, (ed. P.T. McCabe), London: Taylor & Francis, 41-46, 2003.
  4. Cho, M. S., A Study on Facility Improvement Plan of Metal Product Companies for Reducing the Musculoskeletal Disorders Risk Factors, Journal of the Korean Institute of Plant Engineering, 14(4), 27-34, 2009.
  5. Hignett, S. and McAtamney, L., Rapid Entire Body Assessment (REBA), Applied Ergonomics, 31(2), 201-205, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-6870(99)00039-3
  6. Jeong, B. Y., Risk Factors Analysis System: Current Issues and Future Directions, Journal of the Ergonomics Society of Korea, 26(2), 123-129, 2007. https://doi.org/10.5143/JESK.2007.26.2.123
  7. Karhu, O., Kansi, P. and Kuorinka, I., Correcting working posture in industry: A practical method for analysis, Applied Ergonomics, 8(4), 199-201, 1977. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-6870(77)90164-8
  8. Kim, K. S., Park, J. K. and Kim, D. S., Status and Characteristics of Occurrence of Work-related Musculoskeletal Disorders, Journal of the Ergonomics Society of Korea, 29(4), 405-422, 2010. https://doi.org/10.5143/JESK.2010.29.4.405
  9. Lee, I. S., Jung, M. K. and Kee, D. H., Evaluation of Postural Load of Varying Leg Postures Using the Psychophysical scaling, Journal of the Ergonomics Society of Korea, 21(4), 47-65, 2002.
  10. Macleod, D., The office ergonomics kit, lewis Publisher, New York, 1999.
  11. Mcatamney, L. and Corlett, E. N., RULA: a survey method for the investigation of work-related upper limb disorders, Applied Ergonomics, 24(2), 91-99, 1993. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-6870(93)90080-S
  12. Park, J. K., Park, S. J. and Jung, E. S., Psychophysical Evaluation of Postural Stresses for Combined Task at Varying Working Time and Workload of Single Tasks, Journal of the Ergonomics Society of Korea, 25(1), 7-16, 2006. https://doi.org/10.5143/JESK.2006.25.1.007
  13. Park, D. B.. Lee, S. K., Jang, H. G. and Go, S. B., IE work measurement and improvement technology to field reform practice, Korea Management Association Consulting Publishers, 1996.
  14. Shin, C. K. and Jeong, B. Y., Comparison of Task Assessment Results between Work Sampling Scenes and Extreme Task Scenes, Journal of the Ergonomics Society of Korea, 27(3), 53-60, 2008. https://doi.org/10.5143/JESK.2008.27.3.053
  15. Sul, J. G. Kang, D. M., Lee, S. I. and Kim, Y. K., Dose-Response Relationships between Work-Related Musculoskeletal Neck Symptom and Physical Risk Factors (2 year follow-up study), Korean J Occup Environ Med, 19(2), 145-155, 2007.
  16. Whang, A., Theory of Work Management, Youngji Publishers, 1987.