DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Study on Selection of human Model for Controllability Evaluation According to Working Postures

  • Kim, Do-Hoon (Department of Industrial and Management Engineering, Korea University) ;
  • Park, Sung-Joon (Department of Industrial and Management Engineering, Namseoul University) ;
  • Lim, Young-Jae (Department of Industrial and Management Engineering, Korea University) ;
  • Jung, Eui-S. (Department of Industrial and Management Engineering, Korea University)
  • Received : 2011.11.16
  • Accepted : 2011.12.15
  • Published : 2012.06.30

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to suggest appropriate human model for ergonomic evaluation considering working postures on 3D space. Background: Traditionally extreme design rules have been widely utilized at the stage of designing products. Body size of 5th percentile and 95th percentile in stature has been generally selected for controllability and clearance evaluation, respectively. However, these rules had limitations in reflecting working posture in ergonomic evaluation. Method: In order to define working posture on 3D space, not only sagittal plane but also lateral plane was considered. Kinematic linkage body model was utilized for representation of working posture. By utilizing the anthropometric data of 2,836 South Korean male populations, the point cloud for end points of linkage models was derived. The individuals who were lacking in certain controllability were selected as human models for the evaluation. Result: In case of standing posture it was found that conventional approach is proper for all controllability evaluations. Contrary to standing posture, tall people had less controllability on control location below shoulder point in sitting posture. Conclusion: From the derived proper range on controllability, ergonomic evaluation rule was suggested according to working posture especially in standing and sitting. Application: The results of the study are expected to aid in selection of appropriate human model for ergonomic evaluation and to improve the usability of products and work space.

Keywords

References

  1. Badler, N., Allbeck, J., Lee, S. J., Rabbitz, R., Broderick, T. and Mulkern, K., New behavioral paradigms for virtual human models, SAE Technical Paper, 114, 723-729, 2005.
  2. Chaffin, D. B., Improving digital human modeling for proactive ergonomics in design, Ergonomics, 48(5), 478-491, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140130400029191
  3. Eynard, E., Fubini, E., Masali, M., Cerrone, M. and Tarzia, A., Generation of virtual man models representative of different body proportion and application to ergonomic design of vehicles, Proceedings of the IEA2000/HFES2000 Congress, 489-492, 2000.
  4. Jared M. Spool., Tara Scanlon and Carolyn Snyder, Product Usability: Survival Techniques, proceeding of CHI 97 conference on Human factors in computing systems, 154-155, 1997.
  5. Julian, F., Statistics for Digital Human Motion Modeling in Ergonomics, Technometrics, 2007.
  6. Lim, Y. J., Park, S. J., Park, W. J., Park, J. S., Jung, E. S. and Lim, I. S., Development Software to Select Boundary Manikins for Product Evaluation: Applied to an Automobile Case Ergonomics Society of Korea, 2010.
  7. Lee, K. S., Yoo, H. C., Kwon, O. C. and Jung, M. C., "The development of process for extracting PUI design guideline", Ergonomics Society of Korea, 355-358, 2007.
  8. Park, S. J., Estimation of Driver's Standard Postures by a Multivariate Analysis Method, Ergonomics Society of Korea, 25(1), 27-33, 2006. https://doi.org/10.5143/JESK.2006.25.1.027
  9. Park, S. J., The development of Korean marginal human model for ergonomic product development, Korea Agency for Technology and standards, 2009.
  10. Park, J. H., Han, C. M. and Woo, C. W., "The study on framework of vehicle interior evaluation at usability test", Ergonomics Society of Korea, 2007.
  11. Pheasant, S., Bodyspace: Anthropometry, ergonomics and eesign. London: Taylor & Francis.1988.
  12. Vogt, C, Mergl, C. and Bubb, H., Interior Layout Design of Passenger Vehicles with RAMSIS, Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing, 15(2), 197-212, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1002/hfm.20022