Effects of Sand Supply and Artificial Floods on Periphyton in the Downstream of a Dam (Yangyang Dam, Korea)

모래 공급과 인공 홍수가 양양댐 하류하천의 부착조류에 미치는 영향

  • Park, Misook (Department of Environmental Science, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Lee, Jaeyong (Department of Environmental Science, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Jung, Sungmin (Department of Environmental Science, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Park, Chang-Keun (Department of Civil Engineering, Kwandong University) ;
  • Chang, Kun (Yangyang Pumped Storage Power Plant, Korea Hydro and Nuclear Power Co.) ;
  • Kim, Bomchul (Department of Environmental Science, Kangwon National University)
  • 박미숙 (강원대학교 자연과학대학 환경과학과) ;
  • 이재용 (강원대학교 자연과학대학 환경과학과) ;
  • 정성민 (강원대학교 자연과학대학 환경과학과) ;
  • 박창근 (관동대학교 토목공학과) ;
  • 장군 (한국수력원자력(주) 양양양수발전소) ;
  • 김범철 (강원대학교 자연과학대학 환경과학과)
  • Published : 2012.05.30

Abstract

Dam construction in a river can change its hydrological pattern and trap sediments, which results in ecological changes in the downstream. It is a common phenomenon in the downstream of dams to have decreased sediment flow and increased periphyton. Artificial floods and sediment application are suggested as mitigation practices in order to simulate natural process of flood; transporting sediment and sloughing periphyton off. In this study the effects of artificial floods on periphyton were examined by applying sand artificially and discharging water from a dam (Yangyang Dam, Korea). The study area has been suffering from turbidity problems caused by shore erosion of the dam. The accumulation of inorganic sediments and increase of periphyton on the river bottom are the major factors of habitat deterioration in the downstream reaches. Artificial flood and artificial addition of sand was performed in summer and the effects were measured. Piles of applied sands were washed off easily by discharge and it enhanced the periphyton sloughing effect. The removal efficiency of periphyton was 50 ~ 80% within the 2 km reach from the dam. In conclusion artificial floods and sand application can be a good mitigation measure for the habitat rehabilitation after a dam construction in streams.

Keywords

References

  1. 곽인실, 송미영, 전태수(2004). 저서성 대형무척추동물의 자연적 교란에 대한 영향, 한국육수학회지, 37(1), pp. 87-95.
  2. 김현주, 윤해순, 김진수, 김현우, 주기재(1997). 산지하천에서 빛과 초식에 의한 부착조류의 생체량변화, 한국육수학회지, 30(4), pp. 385-392.
  3. 신재기, 조경제(1998). 대청천 부착조류의 1차 생산성, 한국육수학회지, 31, pp. 294-302.
  4. 정세웅, 김유경(2005). 상류 댐 플러싱 방류가 금강의 겨울철 암모니아성 질소 농도 저감에 미치는 효과분석, 수질보전 한국물환경학회지, 21(6), pp. 609-616.
  5. 조경제(1994). 인공기질을 이용한 부착조류조사, 한국육수학회지, 27(1), pp. 47-57.
  6. APHA, AWWA and WEF (1998). Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, (20th ed.), American public Health Association, Washinton. DC, pp. 4-117, 4-146, 10-18, 10-34.
  7. Biggs, B. J. F., Goring, D. G., and Nikora, V. I. (1998). Subsidy and Stress Responses of Stream Periphyton to Gradients in Water Velocity as a Function of Community Growth Form, Journal of Phycology, 34, pp. 598-607. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1529-8817.1998.340598.x
  8. Biggs, B. J. F., Smith, R. A., and Duncan, M. J. (1999). Velocity and Sediment Disturbance of Periphyton in Headwater Streams: Biomass and Metabolism, Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 18(2), pp. 222-241. https://doi.org/10.2307/1468462
  9. Boisson, J. C. and Perrodin, Y. (2005). Effects of Road Runoff on Biomass and Metabolic Activity of Periphyton in Experimental Experimental Streams, Journal of Hazardous Materials, 5042, pp. 1-7.
  10. Butcher, R. W. (1947). Studies on the Ecology of Rivers: VII. The Algae of Organically Enriched Waters, Journal of Ecology, 35(1/2), pp. 186-191. https://doi.org/10.2307/2256507
  11. Cobb, D. G., Galloway, T. D., and Flannagan, J. F. (1992). Effects of Discharge and Substrate Stability on Density and Species Composition of Stream Insects, Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciencis, 49, pp. 1788-1795. https://doi.org/10.1139/f92-198
  12. Dodds, W. K., Smith, V. H., and Zander, B. (1997). Developing Nutrient Targets to Control Benthic Chlorophyll Levels in Streams: A Case Study of the Clark Fork River, Water Research, 31(7), pp. 1738-1750. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(96)00389-2
  13. Figueroa-Nieves, D., Royer, T. V., and David, M. B. (2006). Controls on Chlorophyll-a in Nutrient-Rich Agricultural Streams in Illinois, USA, Hydrobiologia, 568, pp. 287-298. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-006-0114-3
  14. Horner, R. R., Welch, E. B., Seeley, M. R., and Jacoby, J. M. (1990). Response of Periphyton to Changes in Current Velocity, Suspended Sediment and Phosphorus Concentration, Freshwater Biology, 24, pp. 215-232. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.1990.tb00704.x
  15. Jakop, C., Rovinson, C. T., and Uehlinger, U. (2003). Longitudinal Effects of Experimental Floods on Stream Benthos Downstream from a Large Dam, Aquatic Sciences, 65, pp. 223-231. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00027-003-0662-9
  16. Jeppesen, E., Sondergaard, M., Kanstrup, E., Petersen, B., and 5 others (1994). Does the Impact of Nutrients on the Biological Structure and Function of Brackish and Freshwater Lakes Differ?, Hydrobiologia, 275-276, pp. 15-30. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00026696
  17. Katano, I., Doi, H., Houki, A.. Isobel, Y., and Oishi, T. (2007). Changes in Periphyton Abundance and Community Structure with the Dispersal of a Caddisfly Grazer, Micrasema Quadriloba, Japanese Society Limnology, 8, pp. 219-226.
  18. Kjeldsen, K., Iversen, T. M., Thorup, J., and Winding, T. (1998). Benthic Algal Biomass in an Unshaded First-Order Lowland Stream: Destribution and Regulation, Hydrobiologia, 377, pp. 107-122. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003267214509
  19. Lamberti, G. A. (1993). Grazing Experiments in Artificial Streams, Journal of North American Benthological Society, 12, pp. 337-343.
  20. Liboriussen, L., Jeppesen, E., Bramm, M. E., and Lassen, M. F. (2005). Periphyton-macroinvertebrate Interactions in Light and Fish Manipulated Enclosures in a Clear and a Turbid Shallow Lake, Aquatic Ecology, 39, pp. 23-39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10452-004-3039-9
  21. McCartney, M. P., Sullivan, C., and Acremas, M. C. (2001). Ecosystem Impacts of Large Dams, Report to IUCN, UNEP and WCD. http://intranet.iucn.org/webfiles/doc/archive/2001/iucn852.pdf/.
  22. Mosisch, T. D. and Bunn, S. E. (1997). Temporal Patterns of Rainforest Stream Epilithic Algae in Relation to Flow-related Disturbance, Aquatic Botany, 58, pp. 181-193. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3770(97)00001-6
  23. Munn, M. D., Osborne, L. L., and Wiley, M. J. (1989). Factors Influencing Periphyton Growth in Agricultural Streams of Central Illinois, Hydrobiologia, 174, pp. 89-97. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00014057
  24. Poff, N. L., Allan, J. D., Bain, M. B., Karr, J. R., Prestegaard, K. L., Richter, B. D., Sparks, R. E., and Stromberg, J. C. (1997). The Natural Flow Regime: A Paradigm for River Conservation and Restoration, BioScience, 47, pp. 769-784. https://doi.org/10.2307/1313099
  25. Robinson, C. T. and Uehlinger, U. (2008). Experimental Floods Cause Ecosystem Regime Shift in a Regulated River, Ecological Applications, 18(2), pp. 511-526. https://doi.org/10.1890/07-0886.1
  26. Roll, S. K., Diehj, S., and Cooper, S. D. (2005). Effects of Grazer Immigration and Nutrient Enrichment on an Open Algae-Grazer System, Oikos, 108, pp. 386-400. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0030-1299.2005.12950.x
  27. Sparks, R. E. (1995). Need for Ecosystem Management of Large Rivers and Their Floodplains, BioScience, 45, pp. 168-182. https://doi.org/10.2307/1312556
  28. Stanford, J. A., Ward, J. V., Liss, W. J., Frissell, C. A., Williams, R. N., Lichatowich, J. A., and Coutant, C. C. (1996). A General Protocol for Restoration of Regulated Rivers, Regulated Rivers Research and Management, 12, pp. 391-413. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1646(199607)12:4/5<391::AID-RRR436>3.0.CO;2-4
  29. Stevens, L. E., Ayers, T. J., Bennett, J. B., Christensen, K., Kearsley, M. J. C., Meretsky, V. J., Phillips, A. M. III, Parnell, R. A., Spence, J., Sogge, M. K., Springer, A. E., and Wegner, D. L. (2001). Planned Flooding and Colorado River Riparian Trade-Offs Downstream from Glen Canyon Dam, Arizona, Ecological Applications, 11, pp. 701-710. https://doi.org/10.1890/1051-0761(2001)011[0701:PFACRR]2.0.CO;2
  30. Sumi, T., Murasaki, M., Nagaura, H., Tamaki, H., and Imaki, T. (2005). Study on Measurement of Erosion-Deposition Process of Reservoir Sediment during Flushing Operation (part 2), Annual Journal of hydraulic Engineering, JSCE, 49, pp. 1033-1038. https://doi.org/10.2208/prohe.49.1033
  31. Tett, P., Gallegos, C., Kelly, M. G., Hornberger, G. M., and Cosby, B. J. (1978). Relationships Among Substrate, Flow and Benthic Microalgal Pigment Density in the Mechums River, Virginia, Limnology and Oceanography, 23(4), pp. 785-797. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1978.23.4.0785
  32. Uehlinger, U., Kawecka, B., and Robinson, C. T. (2003). Effects of Experimental Floods on Periphyton and Stream Metabolism Below a High Dam in the Swiss Alps(River Spol), Aquatic Sciences, 65, pp. 199-209. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00027-003-0664-7
  33. Van Nieuwenhuyse, E. E. and Jones, J. R. (1996). Phosphorus- Chlorophyll Relationship in Temperate Streams and Its Vriaton with Stream Catchment Area, Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciencis, 53, pp. 99-105.
  34. Vinson, M. R. (2001). Long-term Dynamics of an Invertebrate Assemblage Downstream from a Large Dam, Ecological Applications, 11(3), pp. 711-730. https://doi.org/10.1890/1051-0761(2001)011[0711:LTDOAI]2.0.CO;2
  35. Welch, E. B., Jacoby, J. M., Honer, R. R., and Seeley, M. R. (1988). Nuisance Biomass Levels of Periphytic Algae in Streams, Hydrobiologia, 157, pp. 161-168. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00006968
  36. Wetzel, R. G. (1975). Limnology, Saunders. Philadelphia, pp. 388-418.
  37. Yamada, H. and Nakamura, F. (2002). Effect of Fine Sediment Deposition and Channel Works on Periphyton Biomass in the Makomanai River, Northern Japan, River Research and Applications, 18, pp. 481-493. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.688