Journal of Korean Society on Water Environment (한국물환경학회지)

Korean Society on Water Environment (한국물환경학회)
권호 표지

Evaluation of Runoff Prediction from Managed Golf Course using WEPP Watershed Model

WEPP 모형을 이용한 골프장 잔디 관리에 따른 유출특성 모의

  • Choi, Jaewan (National Institute of Environmental Research) ;
  • Shin, Min Hwan (Department of Regional Infrastructure Engineering, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Ryu, Ji Chul (Department of Regional Infrastructure Engineering, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Kum, Donghyuk (Department of Regional Infrastructure Engineering, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Kang, Hyunwoo (Department of Regional Infrastructure Engineering, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Cheon, Se Uk (National Institute of Environmental Research) ;
  • Shin, Dong Seok (National Institute of Environmental Research) ;
  • Lim, Kyoung Jae (Department of Regional Infrastructure Engineering, Kangwon National University)
  • 최재완 (국립환경과학원 수질총량연구과) ;
  • 신민환 (강원대학교 지역건설공학과) ;
  • 류지철 (강원대학교 지역건설공학과) ;
  • 금동혁 (강원대학교 지역건설공학과) ;
  • 강현우 (강원대학교 지역건설공학과) ;
  • 천세억 (국립환경과학원 수질총량연구과) ;
  • 신동석 (국립환경과학원 수질총량연구과) ;
  • 임경재 (강원대학교 지역건설공학과)
  • Published : 2012.01.30
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

It has been known that Golf course could impose negative impacts on water-ecosystem if pollutant-laden runoff is not treated well. It is important to control non-point source and re-use treated wastewater from the golf course to secure water quality of receiving waterbodies. At golf courses, the rainfall-runoff is affected by various practices to manage grasses. In many hydrological modelings, especially in simple rainfall-runoff modeling, effects on runoff of plant growth and cutting are not considered. In the study, the water erosion prediction project (WEPP), capable of simulating plant growth and various management, was evaluated for its runoff prediction from golf course under grass cutting and irrigation. The %Difference, $R^2$ and the NSE for runoff comparisons were 1.15%, 0.93 and 0.92 for calibration, and 18.12%, 0.82 and 0.88 for validation period, respectively. In grass cutting scenario, grass height was managed to be 18~25 mm. The estimated runoff was decreased by 27%. The difference in estimated total runoff was 11.8% depending on irrigation. As shown in this study, if grass management and irrigation are well-controlled, water quality of downstream areas could be obtained.

Keywords

References

  1. 금강물환경연구소(GERC) (2009). 주요 비점오염원 유출 장기모니터링 및 저감기법연구, pp. 34-39.
  2. 서천범(2006). 레저백서, 한국레저산업연구소, pp. 2.
  3. 손정호(2002). WEPP 모형을 이용한 토양유실량 추정, 석사학위논문, 서울대학교, pp. 6.
  4. 이정식, 구본일(2002). 골프장의 자연환경 폐해문제와 친환경적 대처방안, 한국체육철학회지, 10(2), pp. 1-31.
  5. 한국토양정보시스템(2005). http://asis.rda.go.kr/.
  6. ASCE (1993). ASCE Task Committee on Definition of Criteria for Evaluation of Watershed Models, Criteria for Evaluation of Watershed Models, Irrigation Drainage Engineering, 119(3), pp. 429-442.
  7. Donigian, Jr., A. S. (2000). HSPT Training Workshop Handbook and CD. Lecture #19, Calibration and Verification Issues, Presented and Prepared for U.S. EPA, Office of Water, Office of Science and Technology, Washington, D.C., pp. 10-11.
  8. Flanagan, D. C. and Livingston, S. J. (1995). WEPP User Summary, NSERL Report 11, USDA-ARS National Soil Erosion Research Laboratory, West Lafayette, Indiana, pp. 10.
  9. Gete, Z., Winter, T., and Flanagan, D. (2000). BPCDG: Breakpoint Climate Data Generator for WEPP Using Observed Standard Weather Data Sets. http://topsoil.nserl.purdue.edu/nserlweb/weppmain/BPCDG.html/.
  10. NAMUNET (2010). http://www.namunet.co.kr/.
  11. Nash, J. E. and Sutcliffe, J. V. (1970). River Flow Forecasting through Conceptual Models. Part I: Adiscussion of Principles, Jounal of Hydrology, 10, pp. 282-290.
  12. Pandey, A., Chowdary, V. M., Mal, B. C., and Billib, M. (2008). Runoff and Sediment Yield Modeling from a Small Agricultural Watershed in India Using the WEPP Model, Journal of Hydrology, 348, pp. 305-319.
  13. Soil Conservation Service (1972). National Engineering Handbook, Section 4. Hydrology. U. S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. Washington, D. C., pp. 7-11.
  14. Williams, J. R., Jones, C. A., Kiniry, J. R., and Spanel, D. A. (1989). The EPIC Crop Growth Model. Transactions of the ASABE, 32(2), pp. 497-511.