한국기계가공학회지 (Journal of the Korean Society of Manufacturing Process Engineers)

  • 제11권4호
  • /
  • Pages.46-50
  • /
  • 2012
  • /
  • 1598-6721(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-0771(eISSN)
한국기계가공학회 (The Korean Society of Manufacturing Process Engineers)
권호 표지

정형보철용 금속이 자기공명영상에 미치는 영향 I

Effect of Metals used in Orthopedic on Magnetic Resonance Imaging I

  • 김형균 (금오공과대학교 대학원 지능기계공학과) ;
  • 최성대 (금오공과대학교 지능기계공학과)
  • 발행 : 2012.08.31
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Stainless steel and titanium used for orthopedic prosthetic metal, magnetic resonance imaging was measured quantitatively the extent of distortion. Based on reading tests at varying metal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were investigated. To two image acquisition conditions for having three metal bodies mutually quantitative it compared analyzed the image of cross direction and the image of lengthwise. As for the distortion of the magnetic resonance image, as for the distortion of image it became small in the order of Clip, Strainless and Titanium. In addition, with T1WI and T2WI which are image acquisition condition T2WI the distortion of image became small. As for the distortion of the image by the metal, you could see the distortion of image in elliptical shape, the metal a bigger image distortion appeared in many parts. If clinical doctor has the condition of the same operation, use the Titanium material, it can, raising the diagnostic value of magnetic resonance image inspection after the operating from Stainless.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. No hyoen ah et al. "A Study of image Magnetic Resonance Susceptibility artifact using the Metallic implant materials", Journal of The Korean Society of MR Technology, Vol. 15, pp. 219-237, 2005.
  2. park yong hoon et al. "A study of Jujajang on the inhomogeneity and the image distortion", Journal of The Korean Society of MR Technology, Vol. 15, pp. 219-237, 2005.
  3. Lee sung woo. "The newest magnetic resonance imaging studies", Ryo Moon Gak, pp. 288-289, 1998.
  4. Lee sang tae, "Magnetic resonance imaging studies", Charged Cultural History. pp. 67-69, 107-110, 119-132. 2008.
  5. Shellock FG, Morisoli S., Kanal E., "MR procedures and biomedical implants", materials, and devices:1993updates. Radiology, Vol. 189, pp. 587-599, 1993.
  6. Shellock FG, "MR imaging of metallic implants and materials: a complication of the literature", AJR, Vol. 151, pp. 811-814. 1998.
  7. Shellock FG, Crues JV, "High-field strength MR image and metallic biomedical implants: an ex vivo evaluation of deflection forces", AJR. Vol. 151, pp. 389-392, 1988.
  8. Farahani K, Sinha U, Sinaha S, Chiu LC, Lufkin RB, "Effect of field strength on susceptibility artifacts in magnetic resonance imaging Comput Med Imaging Graph", Vol. 14, pp. 409-413, 1990.
  9. Kochli VD, Mckinnon GC, Hofmann E, von Schulthess GK, "Vascular interventions guided by ultrafast MR imaging: evaluation of different materials", Magn Reson Med. Vol. 31, pp. 309-314, 1994.
  10. Atlas SW, Artifacts, In Joseph PM, Atlas SW, "Magnetic imaging of the Brain and spine", 2nd ed. Philandelphia: Lippincott-Raven. pp. 149-177, 1996.