References
- Tinschert J, et al.: Marginal fit of alumina-and zirconia-based fixed partial dentures produced by a CAD/CAM system. Oper Dent 26: 367-374, 2001.
- Rekow ED: High-technology innovations and limitations for restorative dentistry. Dent Clin North Am 37: 513-524, 1993.
- Christensen GJ: Impressions are changing: deciding on conventional, digital or digital plus in-office milling. J Am Dent Assoc 140: 1301-1304, 2009.
- Beuer F, Schweiger J, Edelhoff D: Digital dentistry: an overview of recent developments for CAD/CAM generated restorations. Br Dent J 204: 505-511, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2008.350
- May KB, et al.: Precision of fit: the procera all-ceram crown. J Prosthet Dent 80: 394-404, 1993.
- Miyazaki T, et al.: A review of dental CAD/CAM: current status and future perspectives from 20 years of experience. Dent Mater J 28: 44-56, 2009. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.28.44
- Khalid AA, Ayman E: The effect of adding a stone base on the accuracy of working casts using different types of dental stones. J Contemp Dent Pract 7: 575-586, 2006.
- Anusavice KJ. Phillip's science of dental material. 11th ed. WB Saunders, Philadelphia, pp.621-654, 2003.
- Millstein PL: Determining the accuracy of gypsum casts made from Type IV dental stone. J Oral Rehabil 19: 239-243, 1992. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.1992.tb01098.x
- Moser JB, Stone DG, Willoughby GM: Properties and characteristics of resin die material. J Prosthet Dent 34: 297-304, 1975. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(75)90107-9
- Kasier DA, Nicholls JI: A study of distortion and surface hardness of improved artifical stone casts. J Prosthet Dent 36: 373-381, 1976. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(76)90157-8
- Linke BA, Nicholls JI, Faucher RR: Distortion analysis of stone casts made from impression materials. J Prothet Dent 54: 794-802, 1985. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(85)90473-1
- Gordon GE, Johnson Gh, Drennor DG: The effect of tray selection on the accuracy of elastomeric impression materials. J Prothet Dent 63: 12-15, 1990. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(90)90257-D
- Creed B, et al.: Comparison of the accuracy of linear measurement obtained from cone beam computerized tomography images and digital models. Semin Orthod 17: 49-56, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.sodo.2010.08.010
- American Dental Association: Council on dental materials, ANSI/ADA specification No. 25 for Dental Gypsum Products. Am Dent Assoc, Chicago, pp.640-644, 1987.
- Duke PD, et al.: Study of the physical properties of type IV gypsum, resin-containing and epoxy die materials. J Prosthet Dent 83: 466-473, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(00)70043-6
- Delong R, et al.: Accuracy of a system for creating 3D computer models of dental arches. J Dent Res 90: 434-440, 2003.
- Christensen GJ: The state of fixed prosthodontics impressions: room for improvement. J Am Dent Assoc 136: 343- 346, 2006.
- Santoro M, et al.: Comparison of measurements made on digital and plaster models. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 124: 101-105, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(03)00152-5
- Stevens DR, et al.: Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of plaster vs digital study models: comparison of peer assessment rating and Bolton analysis and their constituent measurements. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 129: 794-803, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.08.023
- Keating AP, et al.: A comparison of plaster, digital and reconstructed study model accuracy. J Orthod 35: 191-201, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1179/146531207225022626
- Quimby ML, et al.: The accuracy and reliability of measurements made on computer-based digital models. Angle Orthod 74: 298-303, 2004.
- Zilberman O, Huggare JA, Parikakis KA: Evaluation of the validity of tooth size and arch width measurements using conventional and three-dimensional virtual orthodontic models. Angle Orthod 73: 301-306, 2003.