Journal of dental hygiene science (치위생과학회지)

The Korean Society of Dental Hygiene Science (한국치위생과학회)
권호 표지

Comparison of the Marginal and Internal Fit on the Cast and CAD-CAM Cores

주조에 의한 Core와 CAD-CAM에 의한 Core의 적합도 비교평가

  • Han, Man-So (Department of Dental Laboratory Technology, Daejeon Health Sciences College) ;
  • Kim, Ki-Baek (Department of Dental Laboratory Science and Engineering, Korea University)
  • 한만소 (대전보건대학교 치기공(학)과) ;
  • 김기백 (고려대학교 보건과학대학 치기공학과)
  • Published : 2012.08.31
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Dental CAD (computer-aided design)/CAM (computer-aided manufacturing) systems facilitate the use of zirconia core for all-ceramic crown. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the marginal and internal fit of zirconia core fabricated using a dental CAD/CAM system and to compare the fit of metal cores by a conventional method. Ten identical cases of single coping study models (abutment of teeth 11) were manufactured and scanned. Ten zirconia cores were fabricated using dental CAD/CAM system. An experienced dental technician fabricated 10 samples of metal cores for the control group using the lost wax technique. Marginal and internal fit was measured by the silicone replica technique. Fit was measured with magnification of 160 using a digital Microscope. Margin, rounded chamfer, axial wall and incisal fits were measured for comparison. T-test of independent sample for statistical analysis was executed with SPSS 12.0 for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) (${\alpha}$=0.05). The mean (SD) for marginal, rounded chamfer, axial wall and incisal were: $97.0\;(25.3){\mu}m$, $104.0\;(22.0){\mu}m$, $59.6\;(21.4){\mu}m$ and $124.8\;(33.3){\mu}m$ for the zirconia core group, and $785.2\;(18.4){\mu}m$, $83.8\;(15.1){\mu}m$, $42.7\;(9.6){\mu}m$ and $83.4\;(14.4){\mu}m$ for the metal core group. T-test showed significant differences between groups for margin (p<.001), rounded chamfer (p<.001), axial wall (p<.001) and incisal (p<.001). But zirconia core group observed that the marginal and internal fit values in the present study were within clinically acceptable range.

제한된 조건 하에서 수행된 본 연구에서 다음과 같은 결론을 얻었다. 1. 치과용 캐드캠을 이용하여 제작된 지르코니아 코어의 변연 및 내면 적합도보다 전통적인 방식을 이용하여 제작한 금속 코어가 모든 부위에서 우수하였다(p<.001). 2. 두 그룹 모두에서 적합도가 가장 미흡한 부분은 절단부였고, 축벽부가 가장 우수한 것으로 확인되었다. 본 연구 결과를 볼 때 아직까지는 치과용 캐드캠을 이용하여 보철물을 제작하는 것이 기존의 기공 방식을 이용하여 제작된 보철물의 적합도만큼 만족스럽지는 못하였으나 임상적 허용 범위 안에 존재하였다는 점에서 치과용 캐드캠은 임상적으로 사용이 가능한 것으로 판단된다. 앞으로 기계가 개선되고 가공 방식이 지금보다 발전한다면 기존의 기공 방식을 이용하여 제작되는 보철물의 완성도를 능가할 것으로 생각된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Rosenstiel SF, Land MF, Fujimoto J: Contemporary fixed prosthodontics. 4th ed. Elsevier, St. Louis, p. 774, 2006.
  2. Glauser R et al: Experimental zirconia abutments for implant-supported single-tooth restorations in esthetically demanding regions: 4-year results of a prospective clinical study. Int J Prosthodont 17(3): 285-290, 2004.
  3. Nothdurft FP, Pospiech PR: Clinical evaluation of pulpless teeth restored with conventionally cemented zirconia posts: a pilot study. J Prosthet Dent 95(4): 311-314, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2006.02.024
  4. May KB et al.: Precision of fit: the procera all Ceram crown. J Prosthet Dent 80(4): 394-404, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(98)70002-2
  5. Bindl A, Mormann WH: Marginal and internal fit of allceramic CAD/CAM crown-copings on chamfer preparations. J Oral Rehabil 32(6): 441-447, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2005.01446.x
  6. Sailer I et al.: Clinical study of the color stability of veneering ceramics for zirconia frameworks. Int J Prosthodont 20(3): 263-269, 2007.
  7. Coli P, Karlsson S: Precision of a CAD/CAM technique for the production of zirconium dioxide copings. Int J Prosthodont 17(5): 577-580, 2004.
  8. White SN et al.: Micro leakage of a new crown and fixed partial denture luting agent. J Prosthet Dent 67(2): 156-161, 1992. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(92)90447-I
  9. Shillingburg HT Jr, Hobo S, Fisher DW: Preparation design and margin distortion in porcelain-fused-to-metal restorations. J Prosthet Dent 29(3): 276-284, 1973. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(73)90007-3
  10. Kokubo Y et al.: Clinical marginal and internal gaps of in-ceram crowns fabricated using the GN-I system. J Oral Rehabil 32(10): 753-758, 2005 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2005.01506.x
  11. Holmes JR et al.: Considerations in measurement of marginal fit. J Prosthet Dent 62(4): 405-408, 1989. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(89)90170-4
  12. Harris IR, Wickens JL: A comparison of the fit sparkerded titanium copings and cast gold alloy copings. Int J Prosthodont 7(4): 348-355, 1994.
  13. Reich S et al.: Clinical fit of fourunit zirconia posterior fixed dental prostheses. Eur J Oral Sci 116(6): 579-584, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.2008.00580.x
  14. Wettstein F et al.: Clinical study of the internal gaps of zirconia and metal frameworks for fixed partial dentures. Eur J Oral Sci 116(3): 272-279, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.2008.00527.x
  15. Quante K, Ludwig K, Kern M: Marginal and internal fit of metal-ceramic crowns fabricated with a new laser melting technology. Dent Mater 24(10): 1311-1315, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2008.02.011
  16. Grenade C et al.: Fit of single tooth zirconia copings: comparison between various manufacturing processes. J Prosthet Dent 105(4): 249-255, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(11)60040-1
  17. Pelekanos S et al.: Micro-CT evaluation of the marginal fit of different in-ceram alumina copings. Eur J Esthet Dent 4(3): 278-292, 2009.
  18. Ostlund LE: Cavity design and mathmatics: their effect on gaps at the margins of cast restorations. Oper Dent 10(4): 122-137, 1985.
  19. Moldovan O et al.: Internal and external fit of CAM-made zirconia bridge frameworks - a pilot study. Dtsch Zahnaztl Z 61(1): 38-42, 2006.
  20. McLean JW, von Frauenhofer JA: The estimation of cement film thickness by an in vivo technique. Br Dent J 131(3): 107-111, 1971. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4802708