DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparison of MRI T2 Relaxation Changes of Knee Articular Cartilage before and after Running between Young and Old Amateur Athletes

  • Cha, Jang Gyu (Department of Radiology, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Bucheon Hospital) ;
  • Lee, Jae Chul (Department of Orthopedics, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Seoul Hospital) ;
  • Kim, Hyun Joo (Department of Radiology, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Seoul Hospital) ;
  • Han, Jong Kyu (Department of Radiology, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Cheonan Hospital) ;
  • Lee, Eun Hye (Department of Radiology, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Bucheon Hospital) ;
  • Kim, Yong Dai (Department of Statistics, College of Natural Sciences, Seoul National University) ;
  • Jeon, Chan Hong (Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Bucheon Hospital)
  • Published : 2012.10.01

Abstract

Objective: To compare changes in T2 relaxation on magnetic resonance (MR) images of knee articular cartilage in younger and older amateur athletes before and after running. Materials and Methods: By using a 3.0-T MR imager, quantitative T2 maps of weight-bearing femoral and tibial articular cartilages in 10 younger and 10 older amateur athletes were acquired before, immediately after, and 2 hours after 30 minutes of running. Changes in global cartilage T2 signals of the medial and lateral condyles of the femur and tibia and regional cartilage T2 signals in the medial condyles of femoral and tibia in response to exercise were compared between the two age groups. Results: Changes in global cartilage T2 values after running did not differ significantly between the age groups. In terms of the depth variation, relatively higher T2 values in the older group than in the younger group were observed mainly in the superficial layers of the femoral and tibial cartilage (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Age-related cartilage changes may occur mainly in the superficial layer of cartilage where collagen matrix degeneration is primarily initiated. However, no trend is observed regarding a global T2 changes between the younger and older age groups in response to exercise.

Keywords

References

  1. Lane NE, Buckwalter JA. Exercise and osteoarthritis. Curr Opin Rheumatol 1999;11:413-416 https://doi.org/10.1097/00002281-199909000-00015
  2. Cymet TC, Sinkov V. Does long-distance running cause osteoarthritis? J Am Osteopath Assoc 2006;106:342-345
  3. Burstein D, Bashir A, Gray ML. MRI techniques in early stages of cartilage disease. Invest Radiol 2000;35:622-638 https://doi.org/10.1097/00004424-200010000-00008
  4. White LM, Sussman MS, Hurtig M, Probyn L, Tomlinson G, Kandel R. Cartilage T2 assessment: differentiation of normal hyaline cartilage and reparative tissue after arthroscopic cartilage repair in equine subjects. Radiology 2006;241:407- 414 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2412051750
  5. Mosher TJ, Dardzinski BJ. Cartilage MRI T2 relaxation time mapping: overview and applications. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2004;8:355-368 https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2004-861764
  6. Glaser C. New techniques for cartilage imaging: T2 relaxation time and diffusion-weighted MR imaging. Radiol Clin North Am 2005;43:641-653, vii https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcl.2005.02.007
  7. Crema MD, Roemer FW, Marra MD, Burstein D, Gold GE, Eckstein F, et al. Articular cartilage in the knee: current MR imaging techniques and applications in clinical practice and research. Radiographics 2011;31:37-61 https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.311105084
  8. Stehling C, Liebl H, Krug R, Lane NE, Nevitt MC, Lynch J, et al. Patellar cartilage: T2 values and morphologic abnormalities at 3.0-T MR imaging in relation to physical activity in asymptomatic subjects from the osteoarthritis initiative. Radiology 2010;254:509-520 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.09090596
  9. Mamisch TC, Trattnig S, Quirbach S, Marlovits S, White LM, Welsch GH. Quantitative T2 mapping of knee cartilage: differentiation of healthy control cartilage and cartilage repair tissue in the knee with unloading--initial results. Radiology 2010;254:818-826 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.09090335
  10. Mosher TJ, Smith HE, Collins C, Liu Y, Hancy J, Dardzinski BJ, et al. Change in knee cartilage T2 at MR imaging after running: a feasibility study. Radiology 2005;234:245-249 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2341040041
  11. Csintalan RP, Schulz MM, Woo J, McMahon PJ, Lee TQ. Gender differences in patellofemoral joint biomechanics. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2002:260-269
  12. Goodwin DW, Wadghiri YZ, Zhu H, Vinton CJ, Smith ED, Dunn JF. Macroscopic structure of articular cartilage of the tibial plateau: influence of a characteristic matrix architecture on MRI appearance. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2004;182:311-318 https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.182.2.1820311
  13. Van Breuseghem I. Ultrastructural MR imaging techniques of the knee articular cartilage: problems for routine clinical application. Eur Radiol 2004;14:184-192 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-003-2142-y
  14. Liess C, Lusse S, Karger N, Heller M, Gluer CC. Detection of changes in cartilage water content using MRI T2-mapping in vivo. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2002;10:907-913 https://doi.org/10.1053/joca.2002.0847
  15. Mosher TJ, Smith H, Dardzinski BJ, Schmithorst VJ, Smith MB. MR imaging and T2 mapping of femoral cartilage: in vivo determination of the magic angle effect. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001;177:665-669 https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.177.3.1770665
  16. Gold GE, McCauley TR, Gray ML, Disler DG. What's new in cartilage? Radiographics 2003;23:1227-1242 https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.235035113
  17. Mosher TJ, Liu Y, Torok CM. Functional cartilage MRI T2 mapping: evaluating the effect of age and training on knee cartilage response to running. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2010;18:358-364 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2009.11.011
  18. Nag D, Liney GP, Gillespie P, Sherman KP. Quantification of T(2) relaxation changes in articular cartilage with in situ mechanical loading of the knee. J Magn Reson Imaging 2004;19:317-322 https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.20000
  19. Rubenstein JD, Kim JK, Henkelman RM. Effects of compression and recovery on bovine articular cartilage: appearance on MR images. Radiology 1996;201:843-850 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.201.3.8939241
  20. Hollander AP, Pidoux I, Reiner A, Rorabeck C, Bourne R, Poole AR. Damage to type II collagen in aging and osteoarthritis starts at the articular surface, originates around chondrocytes, and extends into the cartilage with progressive degeneration. J Clin Invest 1995;96:2859-2869 https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI118357
  21. Mosher TJ, Dardzinski BJ, Smith MB. Human articular cartilage: influence of aging and early symptomatic degeneration on the spatial variation of T2--preliminary findings at 3 T. Radiology 2000;214:259-266 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.214.1.r00ja15259
  22. Lusse S, Claassen H, Gehrke T, Hassenpflug J, Schunke M, Heller M, et al. Evaluation of water content by spatially resolved transverse relaxation times of human articular cartilage. Magn Reson Imaging 2000;18:423-430 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0730-725X(99)00144-7
  23. Lusse S, Knauss R, Werner A, Grunder W, Arnold K. Action of compression and cations on the proton and deuterium relaxation in cartilage. Magn Reson Med 1995;33:483-489 https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.1910330405

Cited by

  1. Quantitative evaluation in combination with nonquantitative evaluation in early patellar cartilage osteoarthritis at 3.0 T vol.9, pp.None, 2012, https://doi.org/10.2147/cia.s65871
  2. T2 Mapping of the Sacroiliac Joints With 3-T MRI: A Preliminary Study vol.209, pp.2, 2012, https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.16.17244
  3. Impact of physical activity and mechanical loading on biomarkers typically used in osteoarthritis assessment: current concepts and knowledge gaps vol.9, pp.1, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1177/1759720x16670613
  4. Acute changes in knee cartilage transverse relaxation time after running and bicycling vol.53, pp.None, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2017.01.017
  5. Magnetic Resonance Imaging Findings in the Knee Before and After Long-Distance Running-Documentation of Irreversible Structural Damage? A Systematic Review vol.45, pp.5, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546516656180
  6. T2 Versus T2* MRI Mapping in the Knee Articular Cartilage at 1.5 Tesla and 3 Tesla vol.5, pp.1, 2012, https://doi.org/10.2174/1874220301805010119
  7. Effectively Measuring Exercise‐Related Variations in T1ρ and T2 Relaxation Times of Healthy Articular Cartilage vol.52, pp.6, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.27278
  8. Quantifying the biochemical state of knee cartilage in response to running using T1rho magnetic resonance imaging vol.10, pp.None, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-58573-8
  9. A mobile MRI field study of the biochemical cartilage reaction of the knee joint during a 4,486 km transcontinental multistage ultra-marathon using T2* mapping vol.10, pp.None, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-64994-2
  10. Regions at Risk in the Knee Joint of Young Professional Soccer Players: Longitudinal Evaluation of Early Cartilage Degeneration by Quantitative T2 Mapping in 3 T MRI vol.13, pp.1, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1177/1947603520924773