DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Case on the Evaluation of the Information System Project to Enhance the Performance of DIMS(Defense Material Information System)

국방물자정보시스템 성능개선 사업평가에 대한 사례

  • 조성림 (한국국방연구원 국방획득연구센터) ;
  • 임규건 (한양대학교 기술경영전문대학원/경영대학) ;
  • 이대철 (한양대학교 일반대학원 경영학과)
  • Received : 2011.10.31
  • Accepted : 2011.12.16
  • Published : 2012.03.31

Abstract

There are many evaluation models to measure the informatization level of an organization and information system project in the ministry of National Defense of Korea. A information system has to keep up with the environment change as well as the advanced recent information technology (IT). Therefore, the evaluation of an information system project to enhance the performance of the information system should be different from the existing evaluation methods. This study suggests an evaluation case of information system projects to enhance the performance of an information system. In order to achieve the objective of this study, the following steps are taken. First, it reviews the background and the scope of the project to enhance the performance of the Defense Material Information System (DMIS). And it sets up the evaluation logic and develops performance indexes. Then it applies these newly developed performance indexes to the information system project and measures the performance. From this study, we found that both the diffusion and the experience accumulation by its continuous use are significant factors in such evaluations.

Keywords

References

  1. 고영선, 재정사업 심층평가 지침, KDI, 2007.
  2. 국방부, 2009년도 국방부 성과관리시행계획, 2009.
  3. 국방부, 2009년도 국방부 정보화사업 평가결과서, 2009.
  4. 국방부, 국방군수정책서, 2009.
  5. 권혁진 외 6인, 국방정보체계 사업평가 방안 연구, 한국국방연구원, 2009.
  6. 김상훈, 최점기, "공공부문 정보화지원사업의 통합적 성과평가모형 개발", 기업경영연구, 제22권, 제1호(2006), pp.195-220.
  7. 대우정보시스템(주), 국방물자정보체계 성능 개선 사업 운영개념기술서, 2007.
  8. 대우정보시스템(주), 국방물자정보체계 성능 개선 사업 체계개발계획서, 2007.
  9. 대우정보시스템(주), 국방물자정보체계 성능 개선 사업 체계규격서, 2007.
  10. 이상재, 임규건, "정보시스템 서비스 평가를 위한 측정모형의 개발 및 실증적 검증", 한국 IT서비스학회지, 제10권, 제2호(2011), pp. 141-162.
  11. 이석균, 이영민, 류성열, "EA 성숙도 모델의 적용 사례분석 및 개선방아", 한국IT서비스학회지, 제8권, 제1호(2009), pp.59-71.
  12. 임규건, 이재규, 이대철, "전자정부 G2B 시스템의 성과평가 분석을 위한 새로운 평가 모델 및 방법론 개발", Information Systems Review, 제10권, 제2호(2008), pp.269-289.
  13. 임규건, 조남재, 이대철, "정보화사업 투자에 대한 시차효과 분석 : 산업인력정보화 중심," Information System Review, 제1권, 제3호 (2008), pp.133-153.
  14. 정국환, 김혜정, 공공정보화 성과평가 방법론 연구, 정보통신정책연구원, 2007.
  15. 최수동 외 2인, 사용자 중심의 군수지원 성과 분석 및 평가, 한국국방연구원, 2008.
  16. 최수동 외 2인, 전투부대 중심의 군수지원 성과분석 및 평가, 한국국방연구원, 2008.
  17. Arun, R., S. S. Lang, and R. B. Welker, "Assessing the Validity of IS Success Models : An Empirical Test and Theoretical Analysis", Information System Research, Vol.13 (2002), pp.50-69. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.13.1.50.96
  18. Bailly, M. N. and R. J. Gordon, "The Productivity Slowdown, Measurement Issues, and the Explosion of Computer Power", Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Vol.2 (1998), pp.347-420.
  19. Bharadwaj, A. S., "A Resource-based Perspective on Information Technology Capability and Firm Performance : An Empirical Investigation", MIS Quarterly, Vol.24, No.1 (2000), pp.169-196. https://doi.org/10.2307/3250983
  20. Borovits, I. and P. EinDor, "Cost/Utilization : A Measure of System Performance", C. A. C. M., Vol.24, No.3(1997), pp.185-191.
  21. DeLone, W. H. and E. R. McLean, "Infor mation System Success : The Quest for the Dependent Variable", Information System Research, Vol.3, No.1(1992), pp.60-95. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.3.1.60
  22. Ferrari, D., Computer System Performance Evaluation, Prentice Hall, 1978.
  23. Hanes, F. and W. W. Ramage, "Productivity Measurement for Computing and Information Service", Ninth Annual SMIS Conference, L. A., 1997.
  24. Hurtado, C. D., "EDP Effectiveness Evaluation", Journals of Systems Management, (1978), pp.18-21.
  25. Kaplan, R. S. and D. P. Norton, "The balanced scorecard-measures that drive performance", Harvard Business Review, 1992.
  26. Kathryn, E. N. and L. C. Sharon, "Evaluation Public Sector Information Systems : More Than Meets the Eye," Public Administration Review, Vol.51(1991), pp.377-384. https://doi.org/10.2307/976406
  27. Linllrank, P., S. Holopainen, and T Paavola, "Catching Intangible IT Benefits", The Electronic Journal of Information Systems Evaluation, Vol.4, No.1(2001), pp.57-64.
  28. McGuckin, R. H. and K. J. Stiroh, "Computers Can Accelerate Productivity Growth", Issues in Science and Technology, Vol.14, No.4(1998), pp.41-48.
  29. Nachmias. D., Public policy evaluation : Approaches and methods, New York : St. Martin's Press, 1979.
  30. Cho, N. J., G. G. Lim, and D. C. Lee, "An Analysis of the Time-Lag Effects on the Investment of G4C E-Government System by analysing DB Data", Journal of Information Technology Applications and Management, Vol.16, No.4(2009), pp.205-222.
  31. Poister. T. H., "Performance Measurement in Municipal Government : Assessing the State of the Practice", Public Administration Review, Vol.59, No.4(1999), pp.325-335. https://doi.org/10.2307/3110115
  32. Seddon, P. B., "A Respecification and Extension of the Delone and McLean Model of IS Success," Information System Research, Vol.8, No.3(1997), pp.240-253. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.8.3.240
  33. Swanson, E. B., "Management Information Systems : Appreciation and Involvement", Management Science, Vol.21, No.1(1974), pp.178-188. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.21.2.178