DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Linear Measurement Error Variance Estimation based on the Complex Sample Survey Data

  • Heo, Sunyeong (Department of Statistics, Changwon National University) ;
  • Chang, Duk-Joon (Department of Statistics, Changwon National University)
  • Received : 2012.06.08
  • Accepted : 2012.06.24
  • Published : 2012.09.30

Abstract

Measurement error is one of main source of error in survey. It is generally defined as the difference between an observed value and an underlying true value. An observed value with error may be expressed as a function of the true value plus error term. In some cases, the measurement error variance may be also a function of the unknown true value. The error variance function can be rewritten as a function of true value multiplied by a scale factor. This research explore methods for estimation of the measurement error variance based on the data from complex sampling design. We consider the case in which the variance of mesurement error is a linear function of unknown true value, and the error variance scale factor is small. We applied our results to the U.S. Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (the U.S. NHANES III) data for empirical analyses, which has replicate measurements for relatively small subset of initial respondents's group.

Keywords

References

  1. M. P. Cooper, "Web Surveys: a Review of Issues and Approaches". Public Opinion Quarterly, Vol. 64, pp. 464-494, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1086/318641
  2. T. E. Dalenius, "The survey statistician's reponsibility for both sampling and measurement errors", in D. Krewski, R. Platek, and J. N. K. Rao (eds.), Current Topics in Survey Sampling, New York: Academic Press, pp. 17-29, 1981.
  3. P. P. Biemer, R. M. Groves, L. E. Lyberg, N. A. Mathiowetz, and S. Sudman (eds.), "Measurement Errors in Surveys", New York: John Wiley & Sons. 1991
  4. M. Davidian and R. J. Carroll, "Variance function estimation", J. Am. Stat. Assoc., Vol. 82, pp. 1097- 1091, 1987.
  5. R. J. Carroll and D. B. H. Cline, "An asymptotic theory for weighted least -squares with weighted by replication", Biometrics, Vol. 10, pp. 478-486, 1988.
  6. M. Davidian, "Estimation of variance functions in assays with possibly unequal replication and nonnormal data", Biometrika, Vol. 77, pp. 43-54, 1990. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/77.1.43
  7. R. J. Carroll and L. A. Stefanski, "Approximate quasi-likelihood estimation in models with surrogate predictors", J. Am. Statistical Assoc., Vol. 85, pp. 652-663, 1990. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1990.10474925
  8. W. A. Fuller, "Regression estimation in the presence of measurement error", in P. P. Biemer, R. M. Groves, L. E. Lyberg, N. A. Mathiowetz, and S. Sudman 9eds.), Measurement Errors in Surveys, New York: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 616-635, 1991.
  9. J. Shao, "Resampling methods in sample surveys (with discussion)", Statistics, Vol. 27, pp. 203-254, 1996. https://doi.org/10.1080/02331889708802523
  10. J. L. Eltinge, S. Heo, and S. R. Lee, "Use of propensity models in the analysis of subsample re-measurements for NHANES III", in Proceedings of the Survey Mehtods Section, Statistical Society of Canada, pp. 27-36, 1997.

Cited by

  1. Mathematical Approach on Composition of Nomination Committee for University President Election vol.9, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.13160/ricns.2016.9.1.67