Journal of The Korean Digital Architecture Interior Association (한국디지털건축인테리어학회논문집)

Korean Digital Architecture-Interior Association (한국디지털건축·인테리어학회)
권호 표지

A Study on the Establishment of New Town Competitiveness Model

신도시의 경쟁력 모형 설정에 관한 연구

  • 김동윤 (안양대학교 스마트도시공간연구소)
  • Received : 2012.05.14
  • Accepted : 2012.06.01
  • Published : 2012.06.25
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study aims at understanding both the mechanism of new town's competitiveness and its normative pursuit. For the purpose the study steps as follows; (1) Defining operationally cities' competitive power by means of analytic interpretation of substantial nature involved in the preceding studies, (2) Finding some lessons for the desirable development suggested from the history of new town construction in England, France and Japan, where the spatial needs for solving urban problems were exploded after the Second World War, (3) Focusing to agendas regarding development, for example, sustainable development, (4) Recognizing differences between competitiveness of cities and that of new towns and finally (5) Building the model of new town competitiveness, which explains what makes the competitiveness and what kind of effort are necessary for acquiring the advantage. As the result of the process this study concludes that the competitiveness is caused by, or composed of 4 factors. They are Self-sufficiency, Identity, Innovativeness and Sustainability. This frame can be named SIIS-model of new town competitiveness. But there should be contingent and elastic approach in adaptation of these factors to a specific new town, considering its own goal, scale and other situation. The model established in this study is expected to be a analytical frame for the follow-up studies on finding problems and seeking directions of new town development in our country.

Keywords

References

  1. 宮西 悠司, "地域力を高めることがまちづくり : 住民の力と 市街地整備", 都市計画, 143号, 都市計画学会, 1986.
  2. Aaker, D. A. . "Managing Assets and Skills: The Key to Sustainable Competitive. Advantage", California Management Review, 31(2): 91-106, 1989.
  3. Begg, I, "Cities and Competitiveness", Urban Studies, 36(5/6): 795-810, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1080/0042098993222
  4. Begg, I. & Mayes, D., "Cohesion in the European Community: a key imperative for the 1990s", Regional Science and Urban Economics, 23: 427-448, 1993. https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-0462(93)90055-J
  5. Boltho, A., "The Assessment", Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Special issue on Competitiveness, 1996.
  6. Casson, M. C., Economics of Business Culture: Game Theory, Transaction Costs and Economic Welfare, Oxford: University Press, 1991.
  7. Constantin, D. L., "Recent Advance in Territorial Competition and Competitiveness Analysis", Romanian Journal of European Affairs, 2007.
  8. Durand, M. and Giorno, C., "Indicators of international competitiveness: Conceptual aspects and evaluation", OECD Economic Studies, 9: 147-182, 1987.
  9. Fagerberg, J., "Intrnational Competitiveness". Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, 98(391): 355-374, 1988. https://doi.org/10.2307/2233372
  10. Faulkner, D. and Bowman, C., Essence Of Competitive Strategy, Prentice Hall, 1995.
  11. Gordon, I. and Cheshire, P., Local Advantage and Lessons for Territorial Competition in Europe, in Johansson et al., eds., 150-180, 2001.
  12. Harvey, D., The urban experience. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1989.
  13. Hofstede, G.. Culture's consequences: International differences in work-related values. CA: Sage, 1980.
  14. Huovari, J., Kangasharju, A. & Alanen, A., Constructing an Index for Regional Competitiveness , ISBN 952-5299-38-4, 2001.
  15. Kogut, B., "Designing Global Strategies: Comparative and. Competitive Value-Added Chains", Sloan Management Review, 26(4),. Summer, pp. 15-28, 1985.
  16. Krugman, P., "Competitiveness- A Dangerous Obsession", Foreign Affairs, March/April, 73(2), 1994.
  17. Lever, W. F.(1993), "Competition with European Urban System", Urban Studies, 30(6): 935-948, 1993. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420989320080871
  18. OECD, Industrial Competitiveness In The Knowledge-Based Economy: The New Role Of Governments, Paris: OECD, 1997.
  19. Peter, H. and Ward, C., Sociable Cities, London: John Wiley & Sons, 1998.
  20. Petrella, R., I limiti della competitivita, Roma: Manifestolibri, 1995.
  21. Poot, J., "Refrections on Local and Economy-Wide Effects of Territorial Competition", Regional Competitio, Springer, 2000.
  22. Porter, M. E, Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance, New York: Free Press, 33-61, 1985.
  23. Porter, A. Michael, Competitive Advantage of Nations, The Free Press, 1990.
  24. Porter, A. Michael, "Competitive advantage, agglomeration economies and regional policy", International Regional Science Review, 19: 85-90, 1996. https://doi.org/10.1177/016001769601900208
  25. Porter, M. E. and Millar, V. E.. "How information gives you competitive advantage". Harvard Business Review, 63(4), 149-160, 1985.
  26. Rugman, A. M. and Hodgetts, R. M., International Business, Prentice Hall, 2000.
  27. Storper, M., The Regional World: Territorial Development in a Global Economy, New York: Guilford Press, 1997.
  28. Webster, D. and Muller, L., Assessment in Developing Country Urban Regions: The Road Forward, Washington, D.C.: World Ba, 2000.
  29. 김동윤, "도시의 입지결정요인 추출에 관한 연구", 한국디지털건축.인테리어학회논문집. 제11권 2호, pp. 51-60., 한국디지털건축.인테리어학회, 2011.
  30. 김재익, "가구이동과 도시경쟁력에 관한 연구: 대구시 신거주단지를 중심으로", 주택연구, 제3권 제2호, 한국주택학회. 1995.
  31. 노화준, "지역 종합개발에 있어서 경쟁력 강화를 위한 전략적 우선순위 설정 연구 - 경기도 사례를 중심으로", 한국행정학보, 제29권 제2호, 한국행정학회. 1995.
  32. 서울시정개발연구원, 도시경쟁력의 현황과 강화방안 - 서울과 수도권을 중심으로, 1995.
  33. 성송제, 도시의 발전요인분석 및 경쟁력 제고방안에 관한 연구, 안양대학교 박사학위논문, 2010.
  34. 안정근, "21세기 신도시개발 및 정책방향", 주택도시연구, 제80호, 주택도시연구원, pp. 21-32, 2004.
  35. 이용연, "지방도시의 경쟁력 강화를 위한 지역과학기술정책", 도시행정학보, 제8집, 한국도시행정학회, 1995.
  36. 한국경제연구원,지방경쟁력 강화를 위한 기업가형 지방경영, 1995.