DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Prevalence of incidental maxillary sinus findings in Italian orthodontic patients: a retrospective cone-beam computed tomography study

  • Received : 2012.06.02
  • Accepted : 2012.09.10
  • Published : 2012.12.25

Abstract

Objectives: To determine the prevalence of incidental maxillary sinus findings in a large sample of orthodontic patients by cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) with a wide field of view and assess the relationships of such abnormalities with age and gender. Methods: Five hundred thirteen CBCT scans obtained for orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning in a Northern Italian population (N = 513; 292 female and 221 male subjects; 1,026 maxillary sinuses) were studied. The frequencies of pseudocysts and mucosal thickening of the maxillary sinus were recorded. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine the influence of age and gender on these abnormalities. Results: Pseudocysts were detected in 52 patients (10.1%) and 59 sinuses (5.75%). Mucosal thickening was observed in 206 patients (40.1%) and 258 sinuses (25.1%). Gender and age were significantly associated with pseudocysts (p = 0.027) and mucosal thickening (p < 0.001), respectively. Conclusions: Half of the orthodontic patients had incidental maxillary sinus findings. Men were more likely to show pseudocysts, and older patients (aged 41 - 60 years) were more likely to show mucosal thickening.

Keywords

References

  1. Horner K, Islam M, Flygare L, Tsiklakis K, Whaites E. Basic principles for use of dental cone beam computed tomography: consensus guidelines of the European Academy of Dental and Maxillofacial Radiology. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2009;38:187-95. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/74941012
  2. Cha JY, Mah J, Sinclair P. Incidental findings in the maxillofacial area with 3-dimensional cone-beam imaging. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007; 132:7-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.08.041
  3. Rogers SA, Drage N, Durning P. Incidental findings arising with cone beam computed tomography imaging of the orthodontic patient. Angle Orthod 2011;81:350-5. https://doi.org/10.2319/032210-165.1
  4. Ritter L, Lutz J, Neugebauer J, Scheer M, Dreiseidler T, Zinser MJ, et al. Prevalence of pathologic findings in the maxillary sinus in cone-beam computerized tomography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2011;111:634-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2010.12.007
  5. Pazera P, Bornstein MM, Pazera A, Sendi P, Katsaros C. Incidental maxillary sinus findings in orthodontic patients: a radiographic analysis using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Orthod Craniofac Res 2011;14:17-24. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-6343.2010.01502.x
  6. Carter LC, Calamel A, Haller A, Aguirre A. Seasonal variation in maxillary antral pseudocysts in a general clinic population. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1998;27:22-4 https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.dmfr.4600311
  7. Carter L, Farman AG, Geist J, Scarfe WC, Angelopoulos C, Nair MK, et al; American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology. American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology executive opinion statement on performing and interpreting diagnostic cone beam computed tomography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2008;106:561-2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.07.007
  8. Phothikhun S, Suphanantachat S, Chuenchompoonut V, Nisapakultorn K. Cone-beam computed tomographic evidence of the association between periodontal bone loss and mucosal thickening of the maxillary sinus. J Periodontol 2012;83:557-64. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2011.110376
  9. Vallo J, Suominen-Taipale L, Huumonen S, Soikkonen K, Norblad A. Prevalence of mucosal abnormalities of the maxillary sinus and their relationship to dental disease in panoramic radiography: results from the Health 2000 Health Examination Survey. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2010;109:e80-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.10.031
  10. Bondemark L, Jeppsson M, Lindh-Ingildsen L, Rangne K. Incidental findings of pathology and abnormality in pretreatment orthodontic panoramic radiographs. Angle Orthod 2006;76:98-102.
  11. Gordts F, Clement PA, Buisseret T. Prevalence of sinusitis signs in a non-ENT population. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 1996;58:315-9. https://doi.org/10.1159/000276862
  12. Havas TE, Motbey JA, Gullane PJ. Prevalence of incidental abnormalities on computed tomographic scans of the paranasal sinuses. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1988;114:856-9. https://doi.org/10.1001/archotol.1988.01860200040012
  13. Boio JA, Tanaka O, Rovigatti E, de Gruner SK. The incidence of maxillary sinus retention cysts in orthodontic patients. World J Orthod 2009;10:e7-8.
  14. Kravitz ND, Kusnoto B. Risks and complications of orthodontic miniscrews. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007;131(4 Suppl):S43-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.04.027
  15. Papadopoulos MA, Papageorgiou SN, Zogakis IP. Clinical effectiveness of orthodontic miniscrew implants:a meta-analysis. J Dent Res 2011;90:969-76. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034511409236
  16. Gracco A, Tracey S, Baciliero U. Miniscrew insertion and the maxillary sinus: an endoscopic evaluation. J Clin Orthod 2010;44:439-43.
  17. Graham JW, Cope JB. Potential complications with OrthoTADs: classification, prevention, and treatment. In: Cope JB, ed. OrthoTADs: The clinical guide and atlas. Dallas: Under Dog Media LP; 2007. p. 119-34.

Cited by

  1. Incidental findings on cone beam computed tomography scans in cleft lip and palate patients vol.18, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-013-1095-z
  2. Maxillary sinus perforation by orthodontic anchor screws. vol.57, pp.2, 2012, https://doi.org/10.2334/josnusd.57.95
  3. Incidental Findings on Cone Beam Computed Tomography Studies outside of the Maxillofacial Skeleton vol.2016, pp.None, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/9196503
  4. Paranasal sinus pathoses on cone beam computed tomography vol.50, pp.1, 2012, https://doi.org/10.17096/jiufd.47796
  5. Dental implants and grafting success remain high despite large variations in maxillary sinus mucosal thickening vol.3, pp.None, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40729-017-0064-8
  6. Incidental findings in patients evaluated with cone beam computed tomography for orthodontic treatment vol.65, pp.2, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1590/1981-863720170002000063180
  7. Incidental Findings in Cone-Beam Computed Tomographic Images: Calcifications in Head and Neck Region vol.21, pp.2, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1515/bjdm-2017-0015
  8. Evaluation of maxillary sinus findings in children using CBCT vol.178, pp.6, 2019, https://doi.org/10.23736/s0393-3660.18.03833-0
  9. Prevalence of Maxillary Sinus Pathology Based on Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Evaluation of Multiethnicity Dental School Population vol.28, pp.4, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1097/id.0000000000000902
  10. Recommandations de bonnes pratiques de la SFORL lors des chirurgies implantaires en rapport avec le sinus maxillaire vol.137, pp.1, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aforl.2019.06.006
  11. Evaluation of the survival of implant placement simultaneously with sinus augmentation: relationship in maxillary sinus pathologies vol.36, pp.3, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11282-019-00399-w