DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

In vitro physical, chemical, and biological evaluation of commercially available metal orthodontic brackets

  • Kim, Joo Hyoung (GIO Dental Clinic) ;
  • Cha, Jung Yul (Department of Orthodontics, College of Dentistry, Institute of Craniofacial Deformity, Yonsei University) ;
  • Hwang, Chung Ju (Department of Orthodontics, College of Dentistry, Institute of Craniofacial Deformity, Yonsei University)
  • Received : 2012.04.21
  • Accepted : 2012.08.02
  • Published : 2012.12.25

Abstract

Objective: This in vitro study was undertaken to evaluate the physical, chemical, and biological properties of commercially available metal orthodontic brackets in South Korea, because national standards for these products are lacking. Methods: Four bracket brands were tested for dimensional accuracy, (manufacturing errors in angulation and torque), cytotoxicity, composition, elution, and corrosion: Archist (Daeseung Medical), Victory (3M Unitek), Kosaka (Tomy), and Confidence (Shinye Odontology Materials). Results: The tested rackets showed no significant differences in manufacturing errors in angulation, but Confidence brackets showed a significant difference in manufacturing errors in torque. None of the brackets were cytotoxic to mouse fibroblasts. The metal ion components did not show a regular increasing or decreasing trend of elution over time, but the volume of the total eluted metal ions increased: Archist brackets had the maximal Cr elution and Confidence brackets appeared to have the largest volume of total eluted metal ions because of excessive Ni elution. Confidence brackets showed the lowest corrosion resistance during potentiodynamic polarization. Conclusions: The results of this study could potentially be applied in establishing national standards for metal orthodontic brackets and in evaluating commercially available products.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : Food & Drug Administration

References

  1. Creekmore TD, Kunik RL. Straight wire: the next generation. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1993;104:8-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-5406(93)70023-H
  2. Odegaard J, Segner D. Shear bond strength of metal brackets compared with a new ceramic bracket. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1988;94:201-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-5406(88)90028-5
  3. Feldner JC, Sarkar NK, Sheridan JJ, Lancaster DM. In vitro torque-deformation characteristics of orthodontic polycarbonate brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1994;106:265-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(94)70046-X
  4. Cacciafesta V, Sfondrini MF, Scribante A, Klersy C, Auricchio F. Evaluation of friction of conventional and metal-insert ceramic brackets in various bracketarchwire combinations. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003;124:403-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(03)00501-8
  5. Kapur Wadhwa R, Kwon HK, Sciote JJ, Close JM. Frictional resistance in ceramic and metal brackets. J Clin Orthod 2004;38:35-8.
  6. Kim JH, Kwon OW, Choi YY. Discoloration and corrosion resistance of Tin-coated orthodontic appliances produced by Ion-plating method. Korean J Orthod 1993;23:327-40.
  7. Maijer R, Smith DC. Biodegradation of the orthodontic bracket system. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1986;90:195-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-5406(86)90065-X
  8. Toms AP. The corrosion of orthodontic wire. Eur J Orthod 1988;10:87-97. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/10.1.87
  9. House K, Sernetz F, Dymock D, Sandy JR, Ireland AJ. Corrosion of orthodontic appliances-should we care? Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008;133:584-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.03.021
  10. Park HY, Shearer TR. In vitro release of nickel and chromium from simulated orthodontic appliances. Am J Orthod 1983;84:156-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(83)90180-X
  11. Lim YK, Yang WS. An experimental study on the cytotoxicity of orthodontic wires. Korean J Orthod 1996;26:591-9.
  12. Lee GH, Cho JH, Lee KH, Hwang HS. Evaluation of cytotoxicity of electroplated stainless steel orthodontic wire. Korean J Orthod 2005;35:127-36.
  13. Ceen RF, Gwinnett AJ. Indelible iatrogenic staining of enamel following debonding: a case report. J Clin Orthod 1980;14:713-5.
  14. Maijer R, Smith DC. Corrosion of orthodontic bracket bases. Am J Orthod 1982;81:43-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(82)90287-1
  15. Kim MS, Sung JH, Kwon OW. A study on metal release of tin ion-plated stainless steel orthodontic appliances. Korean J Orthod 1995;25:43-54.
  16. International Organization for Standardization. Dentistry: brackets and tubes for use in orthodontics. ISO 27020:2010.
  17. International Organization for Standardization. Biological evaluation of medical devices. Part 5: Test for in vitro cytotoxicity. ISO 10993-5:2009.
  18. International Organization for Standardization. Dental metallic materials: corrosion test methods. ISO 10271:2011.
  19. Oh KT, Choo SU, Kim KM, Kim KN. A stainless steel bracket for orthodontic application. Eur J Orthod 2005;27:237-44. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cji005
  20. Kao CT, Ding SJ, Min Y, Hsu TC, Chou MY, Huang TH. The cytotoxicity of orthodontic metal bracket immersion media. Eur J Orthod 2007;29:198-203. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjl083
  21. Yoo DH, Kook YA, Kim SC. An experimental study on the cytotoxicity of various orthodontic bands. Korean J Orthod 1994;24:419-32.
  22. Lim YK, Yang WS. An experimental study on the cytotoxicity of recycled brackets. Korean J Orthod 1993;23:147-63.
  23. Oh KT, Kim KN. Ion release and cytotoxicity of stainless steel wires. Eur J Orthod 2005;27:533-40. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cji047
  24. Freitas MP, Oshima HM, Menezes LM, Machado DC, Viezzer C. Cytotoxicity of silver solder employed in orthodontics. Angle Orthod 2009;79:939-44. https://doi.org/10.2319/101108-530.1
  25. Eliades T, Athanasiou AE. In vivo aging of orthodontic alloys: implications for corrosion potential, nickel release, and biocompatibility. Angle Orthod 2002;72: 222-37.
  26. Staerkjaer L, Menne T. Nickel allergy and orthodontic treatment. Eur J Orthod 1990;12:284-9. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/12.3.284
  27. Sfondrini MF, Cacciafesta V, Maffia E, Scribante A, Alberti G, Biesuz R, et al. Nickel release from new conventional stainless steel, recycled, and nickel-free orthodontic brackets: an in vitro study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010;137:809-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.07.021
  28. Choi CM, Rhee BT. The effects of heat treatment on mechanical properties and metal release from heattreated orthodontic archwires. Korean J Orthod 1990; 20:381-90.
  29. Grimsdottir MR, Gjerdet NR, Hensten-Pettersen A. Composition and in vitro corrosion of orthodontic appliances. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1992; 101:525-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-5406(92)70127-V
  30. National Research Council. Dietary reference intakes: the essential guide to nutrient requirements. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2006.

Cited by

  1. Antibacterial activity and effect on gingival cells of microwave-pulsed non-thermal atmospheric pressure plasma in artificial saliva vol.7, pp.None, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-08725-0
  2. Application of computational fluid dynamics models for the evaluation of salivary flow patterns and related bacterial accumulation around orthodontic brackets vol.23, pp.3, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1111/ocr.12369