The korean journal of orthodontics (대한치과교정학회지)

The Korean Association Of Orthodontists (대한치과교정학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparison of success rates of orthodontic mini-screws by the insertion method

  • Received : 2012.04.03
  • Accepted : 2012.08.25
  • Published : 2012.10.25
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the success rates of the manual and motor-driven mini-screw insertion methods according to age, gender, length of mini-screws, and insertion sites. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 429 orthodontic mini-screw placements in 286 patients (102 in men and 327 in women) between 2005 and 2010 at private practice. Age, gender, mini-screw length, and insertion site were cross-tabulated against the insertion methods. The Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test was performed to compare the success rates of the 2 insertion methods. Results: The motor-driven method was used for 228 mini-screws and the manual method for the remaining 201 mini-screws. The success rates were similar in both men and women irrespective of the insertion method used. With respect to mini-screw length, no difference in success rates was found between motor and hand drivers for the 6-mm-long mini-screws (68.1% and 69.5% with the engine driver and hand driver, respectively). However, the 8-mmlong mini-screws exhibited significantly higher success rates (90.4%, p < 0.01) than did the 6-mm-long mini-screws when placed with the engine driver. The overall success rate was also significantly higher in the maxilla (p < 0.05) when the engine driver was used. Success rates were similar among all age groups regardless of the insertion method used. Conclusions: Taken together, the motor-driven insertion method can be helpful to get a higher success rate of orthodontic mini-screw placement.

Keywords

References

  1. Kim TW. Clinical application of orthodontic miniimplant. Seoul: Myungmun Publishing; 2008.
  2. Nanda R. Temporary anchorage devices in orthodontics. St. Louis, MO: Mosby Elsevier; 2009.
  3. Park HS. Orthodontic treatment using micro-implant. 2nd ed. Seoul: Daehan Narae Publishing; 2006.
  4. Baumgaertel S, Razavi MR, Hans MG. Mini-implant anchorage for the orthodontic practitioner. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008;133:621-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.03.022
  5. Chen CH, Chang CS, Hsieh CH, Tseng YC, Shen YS, Huang IY, et al. The use of microimplants in orthodontic anchorage. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2006;64: 1209-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2006.04.016
  6. Park HS. Clinical study on success rate of microscrew implants for orthodontic anchorage. Korean J Orthod 2003;33:151-6.
  7. Heidemann W, Terheyden H, Gerlach KL. Analysis of the osseous/metal interface of drill free screws and self-tapping screws. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2001;29:69-74. https://doi.org/10.1054/jcms.2000.0179
  8. Heidemann W, Gerlach KL, Grobel KH, Kollner HG. Drill free screws: a new form of osteosynthesis screw. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 1998;26:163-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1010-5182(98)80007-3
  9. Cohen S, Hargreaves KM. Pathways of the pulp. 9th ed. St. Louis, MO: Mosby Elsevier; 2006.
  10. Eriksson RA, Adell R. Temperatures during drilling for the placement of implants using the osseointegration technique. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1986;44:4-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-2391(86)90006-6
  11. Nam OH. Effect of heat production on alvolar bone surface by ratating speedand virtual preessure of micro-implant drill [dissertation]. Daegu: Kyungpook National University; 2004.
  12. Eriksson AR, Albrektsson T. Temperature threshold levels for heat-induced bone tissue injury: a vitalmicroscopic study in the rabbit. J Prosthet Dent 1983; 50:101-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(83)90174-9
  13. Matthews LS, Hirsch C. Temperatures measured in human cortical bone when drilling. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1972;54:297-308.
  14. Park HS, Jeong SH, Kwon OW. Factors affecting the clinical success of screw implants used as orthodontic anchorage. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006; 130:18-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.11.032
  15. Luzi C, Verna C, Melsen B. Guidelines for success in placement of orthodontic mini-implants. J Clin Orthod 2009;43:39-44.
  16. Moon CH, Lee DG, Lee HS, Im JS, Baek SH. Factors associated with the success rate of orthodontic miniscrews placed in the upper and lower posterior buccal region. Angle Orthod 2008;78:101-6. https://doi.org/10.2319/121706-515.1
  17. Miyawaki S, Koyama I, Inoue M, Mishima K, Sugahara T, Takano-Yamamoto T. Factors associated with the stability of titanium screws placed in the posterior region for orthodontic anchorage. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003;124:373-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(03)00565-1
  18. Kuroda S, Sugawara Y, Deguchi T, Kyung HM, Takano- Yamamoto T. Clinical use of miniscrew implants as orthodontic anchorage: success rates and postoperative discomfort. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007;131:9-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.02.032
  19. Lim HJ, Choi YJ, Evans CA, Hwang HS. Predictors of initial stability of orthodontic miniscrew implants. Eur J Orthod 2011;33:528-32. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjq122
  20. Cheng SJ, Tseng IY, Lee JJ, Kok SH. A prospective study of the risk factors associated with failure of mini-implants used for orthodontic anchorage. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004;19:100-6.
  21. Lim HJ, Eun CS, Cho JH, Lee KH, Hwang HS. Factors associated with initial stability of miniscrews for orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009;136:236-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.07.030
  22. Kim YK, Yeo IS, Yi YJ, Kim UK, Moon KN, Jeon SJ, et al. Multicentric retrospective clinical study on the clinical application ofmini implant system. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg 2010;36:325-30. https://doi.org/10.5125/jkaoms.2010.36.4.325
  23. Crismani AG, Bertl MH, Celar AG, Bantleon HP, Burstone CJ. Miniscrews in orthodontic treatment: review and analysis of published clinical trials. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010;137:108-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.01.027
  24. Motoyoshi M, Hirabayashi M, Uemura M, Shimizu N. Recommended placement torque when tightening an orthodontic mini-implant. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006;17:109-14. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01211.x
  25. Liou EJ, Pai BC, Lin JC. Do miniscrews remain stationary under orthodontic forces? Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004;126:42-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2003.06.018
  26. Fritz U, Ehmer A, Diedrich P. Clinical suitability of titanium microscrews for orthodontic anchoragepreliminary experiences. J Orofac Orthop 2004;65:410-8.
  27. Park HS, Lee SK, Kwon OW. Group distal movement of teeth using microscrew implant anchorage. Angle Orthod 2005;75:602-9.
  28. Tseng YC, Hsieh CH, Chen CH, Shen YS, Huang IY, Chen CM. The application of mini-implants for orthodontic anchorage. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2006;35:704-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2006.02.018
  29. Herman RJ, Currier GF, Miyake A. Mini-implant anchorage for maxillary canine retraction: a pilot study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006;130:228-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.02.029
  30. Wiechmann D, Meyer U, Buchter A. Success rate of mini- and micro-implants used for orthodontic anchorage: a prospective clinical study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2007;18:263-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01325.x
  31. Motoyoshi M, Matsuoka M, Shimizu N. Application of orthodontic mini-implants in adolescents. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007;36:695-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2007.03.009
  32. Chen YJ, Chang HH, Huang CY, Hung HC, Lai EH, Yao CC. A retrospective analysis of the failure rate of three different orthodontic skeletal anchorage systems. Clin Oral Implants Res 2007;18:768-75. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01405.x
  33. Lim SA, Cha JY, Hwang CJ. Comparison of insertion torque regarding changes in shape, diameter, and length of orthodontic miniscrews. Korean J Orthod 2007;37:89-97.
  34. Kravitz ND, Kusnoto B. Risks and complications of orthodontic miniscrews. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007;131(4 Suppl):S43-51.
  35. Yared GM, Bou Dagher FE, Machtou P. Failure of ProFile instruments used with high and low torque motors. Int Endod J 2001;34:471-5. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.2001.00420.x
  36. Gambarini G. Rationale for the use of low-torque endodontic motors in root canal instrumentation. Endod Dent Traumatol 2000;16:95-100. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-9657.2000.016003095.x
  37. Jo WH. Influence of the operator's experience and drilling sites on the root contact during the drilling for micro-implants insertion [dissertation]. Daegu: Kyungpook National University; 2005.
  38. Matsuoka M, Motoyoshi M, Sakaguchi M, Shinohara A, Shigeede T, Saito Y, et al. Friction heat during selfdrilling of an orthodontic miniscrew. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2011;40:191-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2010.10.007
  39. Park JS, Yu W, Kyung HM, Kwon OW. Finite element analysis of cortical bone strain induced byself-drilling placement of orthodontic microimplant. Korean J Orthod 2009;39:203-12. https://doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2009.39.4.203
  40. Yu WJ, Kyung HM. A finite element approach for evaluation of bony stresses influenced by geometrical characteristics of theorthodontic micro-implant to cervical cortical bone interface. J Korea Res Soc Dent Mater 2006;33:381-93.

Cited by

  1. Effects of wobbling angle on the stability measures of orthodontic mini-implants during insertion and removal procedures vol.83, pp.6, 2012, https://doi.org/10.2319/021513-134.1
  2. [NO TITLE AVAILABLE] vol.18, pp.1, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1590/s2176-94512013000100004
  3. Cross-sectional evaluation of the prevalence and factors associated with soft tissue scarring after the removal of miniscrews vol.85, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.2319/101813-772.1
  4. Effect of the length of orthodontic mini-screw implants on their long-term stability: A prospective study vol.85, pp.1, 2012, https://doi.org/10.2319/112113-857.1
  5. Gene Profiling of Bone around Orthodontic Mini-Implants by RNA-Sequencing Analysis vol.2015, pp.None, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/538080
  6. Orthodontic skeletal anchorage: Up-to-date review vol.76, pp.3, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.odw.2017.06.002
  7. Risk factors for orthodontic mini-implants in skeletal anchorage biological stability: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis vol.10, pp.None, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-62838-7
  8. Evaluating the Primary Stability of Implants by two Different Insertion Methodsin Compromised Bone - A Pilot Study vol.13, pp.4, 2012, https://doi.org/10.13005/bpj/2058