DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Current Concepts in the Mandibular Condyle Fracture Management Part II: Open Reduction Versus Closed Reduction

  • Choi, Kang-Young (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine) ;
  • Yang, Jung-Dug (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine) ;
  • Chung, Ho-Yun (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine) ;
  • Cho, Byung-Chae (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine)
  • Received : 2012.07.08
  • Accepted : 2012.07.10
  • Published : 2012.07.15

Abstract

In the treatment of mandibular condyle fracture, conservative treatment using closed reduction or surgical treatment using open reduction can be used. Management of mandibular condylar fractures remains a source of ongoing controversy in oral and maxillofacial trauma. For each type of condylar fracture,the treatment method must be chosen taking into consideration the presence of teeth, fracture height, patient'sadaptation, patient's masticatory system, disturbance of occlusal function, and deviation of the mandible. In the past, closed reduction with concomitant active physical therapy conducted after intermaxillary fixation during the recovery period had been mainly used, but in recent years, open treatment of condylar fractures with rigid internal fixation has become more common. The objective of this review was to evaluate the main variables that determine the choice of an open or closed method for treatment of condylar fractures, identifying their indications, advantages, and disadvantages, and to appraise the current evidence regarding the effectiveness of interventions that are used in the management of fractures of the mandibular condyle.

Keywords

References

  1. Zide MF, Kent JN. Indications for open reduction of mandibular condyle fractures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1983;41: 89-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-2391(83)90214-8
  2. Goss AN, Bosanquet AG. The arthroscopic appearance of acute temporomandibular joint trauma. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1990;48:780-3. https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-2391(90)90330-5
  3. Wood GD. Assessment of function following fracture of the mandible. Br Dent J 1980;149:137-41. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4804473
  4. Klotch DW, Lundy LB. Condylar neck fractures of the mandible. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 1991;24:181-94.
  5. Widmark G, Bagenholm T, Kahnberg KE, et al. Open reduction of subcondylar fractures: a study of functional rehabilitation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1996;25:107-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0901-5027(96)80052-X
  6. Haug RH, Assael LA. Outcomes of open versus closed treatment of mandibular subcondylar fractures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2001;59:370-5. https://doi.org/10.1053/joms.2001.21868
  7. Ellis E 3rd, McFadden D, Simon P, et al. Surgical complications with open treatment of mandibular condylar process fractures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2000;58:950-8. https://doi.org/10.1053/joms.2000.8734
  8. Brown JS, Jones K. Delayed miniplate osteosynthesis for mandibular fractures. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1991;29:286.
  9. Tu HK, Tenhulzen D. Compression osteosynthesis of mandibular fractures: a retrospective study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1985;43:585-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-2391(85)90125-9
  10. Jeter TS, Van Sickels JE, Nishioka GJ. Intraoral open reduction with rigid internal fixation of mandibular subcondylar fractures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1988;46:1113-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-2391(88)90462-4
  11. Kaban LB, Troulis MJ. Pediatric oral and maxillofacial surgery. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2004.
  12. Coletti DP, Salama A, Caccamese JF Jr. Application of intermaxillary fixation screws in maxillofacial trauma. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007;65:1746-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2007.04.022
  13. Gaujac C, Ceccheti MM, Yonezaki F, et al. Comparative analysis of 2 techniques of double-gloving protection during arch bar placement for intermaxillary fixation. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007;65:1922-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2006.06.311
  14. Khosla M, Boren W. Mandibular fractures in children and their management. J Oral Surg 1971;29:116-21.
  15. Dahlstrom L, Kahnberg KE, Lindahl L. 15 years follow-up on condylar fractures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1989;18:18-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0901-5027(89)80009-8
  16. Norholt SE, Krishnan V, Sindet-Pedersen S, et al. Pediatric condylar fractures: a long-term follow-up study of 55 patients. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1993;51:1302-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-2391(10)80132-6
  17. Kaban LB. Diagnosis and treatment of fractures of the facial bones in children 1943-1993. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1993;51:722-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-2391(10)80409-4
  18. Kahl B, Fischbach R, Gerlach KL. Temporomandibular joint morphology in children after treatment of condylar fractures with functional appliance therapy: a follow-up study us computed tomography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1995;24:37-45. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.24.1.8593906
  19. Chuong R, Piper MA. Open reduction of condylar fractions of the mandible in conjunction with repair of discal injury: a preliminary report. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1988;46:257-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-2391(88)90003-1
  20. Ellis E 3rd, Dean J. Rigid fixation of mandibular condyle fractures. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1993;76:6-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(93)90285-C
  21. Ellis E, Zide MF, Manson PN. Surgical approaches to the facial skeleton. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1995.
  22. Choi BH, Kim KN, Kim HJ, et al. Evaluation of condylar neck fracture plating techniques. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 1999;27:109-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1010-5182(99)80023-7
  23. Choi BH, Yoo JH. Open reduction of condylar neck fractures with exposure of the facial nerve. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1999;88:292-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1079-2104(99)70030-2
  24. Choi BH, Yi CK, Yoo JH. Clinical evaluation of 3 types of plate osteosynthesis for fixation of condylar neck fractures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2001;59:734-7. https://doi.org/10.1053/joms.2001.24283
  25. Mathes SJ, Hentz VR. Plastic surgery. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Saunders Elsevier; 2006.
  26. American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons [Internet]. Rosemont: American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons; c2012 [cited 2012 Jul 7]. Avaiable from: http://http://www.aaoms.org/.
  27. Guven O, Keskin A. Remodelling following condylar fractures in children. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2001;29:232-7. https://doi.org/10.1054/jcms.2001.0228

Cited by

  1. The application of the Risdon approach for mandibular condyle fractures vol.13, pp.None, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2482-13-25
  2. Functional Outcomes of Preauricular Underparotid Retrograde Approach for Mandibular Condyle Fractures vol.25, pp.3, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1097/scs.0000000000000514
  3. 다발성 안면골절환자의 교합회복 증례 vol.30, pp.2, 2014, https://doi.org/10.14368/jdras.2014.30.2.159
  4. Treatment of extensive comminuted mandibular fracture between both mandibular angles with bilateral condylar fractures using a reconstruction plate: a case report vol.40, pp.3, 2012, https://doi.org/10.5125/jkaoms.2014.40.3.135
  5. Giant life-threatening external carotid artery pseudoaneurysm caused by a mandibular condylar fracture vol.119, pp.3, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2014.08.017
  6. Epidemiological analysis of mandibular fractures treated in Sao Paulo, Brazil vol.37, pp.4, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.maxilo.2014.03.002
  7. Caracterização miofuncional orofacial e eletromiográfica de pacientes submetidos à correção da fratura condilar por redução aberta e fechada vol.28, pp.5, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/20162015186
  8. Oral motor and electromyographic characterization of adults with facial fractures: a comparison between different fracture severities vol.72, pp.5, 2012, https://doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2017(05)04
  9. Surgical Management of Double/Triple Mandibular Fractures Involving the Condylar Segment: Our Perspective vol.8, pp.1, 2012, https://doi.org/10.4103/jispcd.jispcd_428_17
  10. A Comparative Evaluation of Closed and Open Treatment in the Management of Unilateral Displaced Mandibular Subcondylar Fractures: A Prospective Randomized Study vol.11, pp.3, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0037-1603499
  11. Unilateral mandibular condylar process fractures: a retrospective clinical comparison of open versus closed treatment vol.23, pp.2, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10006-019-00760-7
  12. Surgical Management of Gunshot Injury to the Temporomandibular Joint : vol.30, pp.7, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1097/scs.0000000000005989
  13. Comparison of two L shaped Plate on Plate Versus Single Conventional L Miniplate in Fixation of Subcondylar Mandibular Fractures vol.18, pp.3, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-018-1154-8
  14. Condylar Fractures: An Argument for Conservative Treatment vol.13, pp.1, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1177/1943387520902881
  15. Open Treatment of Mandibular Condyle by Direct Transparotid Approach: Our Experience vol.13, pp.2, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1177/1943387520903543
  16. Biomechanical evaluation of unilateral subcondylar fracture of the mandible on the varying materials: A finite element analysis vol.15, pp.10, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0240352
  17. Condylar Neck and Sub-Condylar Fractures: Surgical Consideration and Evolution of the Technique with Short Follow-Up on Five Cases vol.8, pp.4, 2012, https://doi.org/10.3390/dj8040125
  18. Radiographic Assessment of Pediatric Condylar Fractures after Conservative Treatment with Functional Appliances—A Systematic Review vol.17, pp.24, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17249204
  19. Comparative Evaluation of Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of Retromandibular Transparotid and Transoral Endoscopic-Assisted Approach for Surgical Management of Mandibular Subcondylar Fractures vol.14, pp.2, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1177/1943387520949099
  20. Classification and treatment strategies for condylar fractures in children vol.59, pp.7, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2020.09.016
  21. Two miniplates versus 3-dimensional plate in the management of mandibular subcondylar fractures: a retrospective analysis vol.25, pp.4, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10006-021-00938-y